Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GE ENGINEERS JUST MADE A FULLY-FUNCTIONAL 3D PRINTED JET ENGINE
Digital Trends ^ | 05/14/2015 | Mike Murphy

Posted on 05/14/2015 3:35:57 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

If you needed any more proof that you can make absolutely anything with a 3D printer, check out this video from GE. To showcase the versatility of 3D printing as a manufacturing process, a team of engineers at GE recently built a fully-functional, backpack-sized jet engine made entirely from 3D-printed parts. And it’s not just for show either — the team actually fired the engine up and took it up to 33,000 RPMs to demonstrate how robust the parts are.

Now, obviously, since this is a jet turbine we’re talking about here, it wasn’t printed in ABS with the latest MakerBot model.

Instead, the engine and all of its various internal parts were manufactured over the course of several years using a technique known as Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) — a process in which a laser is aimed at a bed of fine metal particles to selectively melt and fuse them together to create an object layer-by-layer. It’s not the fastest printing method in the world, but the resulting parts are just as strong and reliable as those made via traditional casting or machining techniques.

The cool thing about the turbine — well, besides that it’s 3D-printed — is that it’s not just a miniature version of a full-blown jet engine.

(Excerpt) Read more at digitaltrends.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Science
KEYWORDS: 3dprinting; ge; jetengine; technology

1 posted on 05/14/2015 3:35:58 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good for home many hours, I wonder.


2 posted on 05/14/2015 3:38:17 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Damn them. I wuz gonna do that.

Oh well. Always knew GE or Pratt or Garrett (cough, Honeywell..gak) would do it once DMLS was good enough.

Might point out that this looks like a low performance engine, the compressor has straight radial vanes, turbine is basic and the surfaces are not finished.

Still....it works.

Now everyone can have a jet.

Jets for the masses. What a great thing.


3 posted on 05/14/2015 3:40:27 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

3D printers will revolutionize manufacturing.. Someday people will purchase the templates and output their products from home. Probably end millions of jobs, too. Nonetheless, FORWARD WE GO!


4 posted on 05/14/2015 3:44:26 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is a good use for 3D printing. Very complicated designs that traditionally have to be made from hundreds of parts can be made more cost effectively using additive manufacturing.

The rockets on the Dragon crew spacecraft are also 3D printed:

SpaceX Crew Dragon Spacecraft Takes Flight During Pad Abort Test at Cape Canaveral

5 posted on 05/14/2015 3:57:55 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I didn’t need another reason to not fly.


6 posted on 05/14/2015 4:59:46 PM PDT by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Direct Metal Laser Sintering”

that answers my question...


7 posted on 05/14/2015 5:46:18 PM PDT by Pelham (The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Good for home many hours, I wonder.”

There’s a market for one that would be good for two, if it’s cheap and good enough - A cruise missile, for example. Keep in mind that the MTBF on the Nazi ME-262’ engines was MAYBE 8-10 hours.


8 posted on 05/14/2015 5:54:13 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

“Direct Metal Laser Sintering”

I want a home model for under 2K.


9 posted on 05/14/2015 5:55:00 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Small turbines aren’t efficient anyway - too much surface area per volume fluid flow, correct?


10 posted on 05/14/2015 5:57:42 PM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Interesting!


11 posted on 05/14/2015 6:02:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America; Regulator

Believe it was YEARS ago that having available jet packs on our backs for travel, would be here by now.
Whatever happened to that - ??? Possibly because ‘they’ haven’t figured how to get more travel minutes/mileage per ‘flight.’
Shoot - I was really looking forward to that because I love flying, anyway!
Time is running out for some of us.


12 posted on 05/14/2015 6:44:56 PM PDT by USARightSide (S U P P O R T I N G OUR T R O O P S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Good for home many hours, I wonder.

One certain way to answer that question.
Let the engineers who claim credit for this technological breakthrough to travel exclusively in aircraft powered by the mickey mouse device for the next couple of years.

Normally jet engines last for tens of thousands of flight hours with minimal maintenance.

On the other hand, for "disposable" applications it may fit the bill. Powering drones in a hostile environment comes to mind.

13 posted on 05/14/2015 7:46:44 PM PDT by publius911 (If you like Obamacare, You'll LOVE ObamaWeb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USARightSide
You didn't watch this video????:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3288787/posts

14 posted on 05/14/2015 10:39:17 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

I did see it - 2 nights ago, I think, and already forgot!

These guys are ever so lucky to be able to do this!
But what I mean is I thought years ago we were ‘promised’ JetPacks - so that I would be able to visit a daughter 20 miles west of here - to avoid the busy 101 Ventura Freeway - in perhaps 5 minutes - ?
But not expect to Jet Pack to a daughter in Colorado. That would probably cause nose bleeds!

The pictures of Dubai - ever see the Tom Cruise movie partially shot in Dubai? ‘Mission Impossible - The Ghost - - ‘ something or other. It was on FX Wed. night.
Thanks for sending along that link.


15 posted on 05/15/2015 12:08:29 AM PDT by USARightSide (S U P P O R T I N G OUR T R O O P S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline
Heh, that's taking it back to basics, but yeah that's part of it!

I tend to think of it in terms of Specific Speed (Ns) and the specific diameter (Ds) which is what you're referring to.

And for most companies the big one is Ns because it tells you what machine you want. The GE guys did the right thing because it's a radial machine, the specific speed will push you there for a small gas turbine; unfortunately it will also push you to very high physical speeds of the rotors. For a centrifugal compressor that means a heavy mass spinning fast = high stress.

But all that's been overcome in the last 40 years or so, and low thrust jet engines that are extremely efficient are now common place....mostly in cruise missiles!

Good ol' Barber-Nichols has a good paper on this:How to Select Turbomachinery For Your Application

And of course GE / Pratt / Honeywell / Williams all have performance codes that just spit it out on demand...

16 posted on 05/15/2015 6:34:18 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: publius911
Let the engineers who claim credit for this technological breakthrough to travel exclusively in aircraft powered by the mickey mouse device for the next couple of years

What the hell is "mickey mouse" about it?

Additive manufacturing produces metal parts with fewer voids. DMLS is in its infancy but already it is showing that parts can be built with lower failure rates due to internal cracking under load.

All of this stuff is being implemented now at light speed because anyone with a brain can see that it will utterly revolutionize the factory: no more 5-axis NC mills laboriously cutting a highly complex part and taking days to do it.

There's nothing lightweight about a single spool jet engine turning at 33,000 RPM I guarantee you. That compressor & turbine has been in a spin pit and been taken to burst speed and they know the modes. As engines go it's higher tech then anything built in the 50s. People used to fly in Century series fighters in front of sketchier engines then this.

Realistically only the compressor and the shaft might be built this way; the turbine will be single crystal and that may not change for a while....but peeples be workin' that, too.

It's easy to dismiss some of these technology demonstrators, but it's just the beginning.

17 posted on 05/15/2015 6:53:58 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: USARightSide
The military walked away from jet packs back in the 60's because the engines then were way too in-efficient and control problems were also an issue.

Current generation small gas turbines could fix a lot of that but a ducted fan is the most likely solution.

Instead of an army of guys with jet packs on the military decided that 10 men in a helicopter was the right way to assault the village, thus we got Vietnam...it was the right decision.

If you want one now you can put a deposit on it:

Martin Jet Pack

And maybe they'll deliver it in 2016...

18 posted on 05/15/2015 7:07:15 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson