Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Pink Tax': Why Are Women's Products More Expensive than Mens?
abc 22 ^ | 2-24-2015

Posted on 02/25/2015 12:27:57 AM PST by Citizen Zed

DAYTON-- Identical women's and men's products are being sold at different price points in Ohio.

The phenomenon is known as "pink tax," and we put some products to the test.

One-a-day "Pro Edge" vitamins, 50 count, are packed in the same sized box just different colors; the women's vitamins cost $9.49, while the men's cost $7.99.

Up&Up women's shave gel for dry skin relief costs $2.39, while the identical product for men, packaged in a blue cartridge rather than pink, costs $1.87.

The Gillette Fusion men's razor with five blades and packaged with two extra cartridges costs $10.79, while the women's Gillette Venus Embrace razor with five blades and packaged with two extra cartridges costs $10.99.

When all three items were purchased for each gender, the receipt total for the women's products was $22.87, while the men's totaled $20.65 (pre-tax).

"Its frustrating, I'm not really buying it for the packaging or the aesthetics," said U-D student Claire Cooperrider about the so-called "pink tax."

(Excerpt) Read more at abc22now.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: callawaaambulance; firstworldproblems; victimmentality; waronwomenmeme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2015 12:27:57 AM PST by Citizen Zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

ISIS is burning People alive and this is News.

Stop the World, I want to get off.


2 posted on 02/25/2015 12:32:35 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (If you think the Mulatto Marxist is bad, just wait until the Menopausal Marxist shows up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

It’s just tougher to get men into a store in the first place. If I need an item that costs 10 dollars, I get the item and get the hell out. If I need an item and it costs 10 dollars, and I take my wife with me, we spend 160 dollars.


3 posted on 02/25/2015 12:33:25 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

LOL


4 posted on 02/25/2015 12:45:44 AM PST by Dagnabitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Maybe because they are in greater demand from women... not mentioning fags? duh!

I find it funny it is ok to mandate men to pay for contraception but when the markets find an opportunity to offset men product costs lest they disappear, it is called discrimination.

But this is another redistribution scheme.


5 posted on 02/25/2015 12:46:42 AM PST by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
"It's frustrating, I'm not really buying it for the packaging or the aesthetics," said U-D student Claire Cooperrider about the so-called "pink tax."

Simple solution, Claire: Buy the blue equivalents.

6 posted on 02/25/2015 12:48:11 AM PST by Charles Henrickson (Singing the Pink Blues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

The vendor cannot charge more for the product than the customer is willing to pay. There are a few exceptions like obamacare, but the blue equivalent may be cheaper because it’s a harder sell. As mentioned, the solution is to compare ingredients and if both are the same, buy the cheaper version.


7 posted on 02/25/2015 12:55:53 AM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
They make up a large part of the democrat base, so maybe they like taxes.

Put another way, Fifty Shades of Stupid.

8 posted on 02/25/2015 12:57:38 AM PST by Ken H (DILLIGAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

You can charge more for women’s products. They don’t care about price. They just get their husbands to pay for it.


9 posted on 02/25/2015 1:07:54 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Men have always paid the “Pink Tax”. Quit yer whining.


10 posted on 02/25/2015 1:08:30 AM PST by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

You have a life changing choice to make Claire. You can choose the red package or you can choose the blue package.


11 posted on 02/25/2015 1:08:32 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

i bet you claire’s father pays more for life insurance than claire’s mother.


12 posted on 02/25/2015 1:12:47 AM PST by willywill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

>>>It’s just tougher to get men into a store in the first place. If I need an item that costs 10 dollars, I get the item and get the hell out. If I need an item and it costs 10 dollars, and I take my wife with me, we spend 160 dollars.<<<

I’m sure your wife would point out that everything she bought was on sale. And if the full retail price was $300 for those items she would feel so proud of herself for saving you $140. Dude, appreciate how much money your wife saves when you take her with.


13 posted on 02/25/2015 1:20:23 AM PST by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Some exceptions - hair dye, for example, is cheaper if you buy the brands that are for women (hair is hair).


14 posted on 02/25/2015 1:34:36 AM PST by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

They do stories like this periodically.

Lots of factors play into it. How much marketing they do factors in. They put a lot more women’s ads out there for many products because there is a lot of competition for certain things and they know women buy more items than men. More advertising has to be paid for.

How much it costs to sell a product factors in. Where it is on the shelf factors in. End of an aisle? All that crap. Is it in an upscale store? That factors in. It may be the same type of product but have different ingredients. That factors in. Packaging may be more expensive. Might have a fancier box and little extras compared to the shrink-wrapped mens’ comparable product with no extras. With the shave gel perhaps men’s is less because they go through a can faster than a woman does.

They still are free to buy the lower priced product. There are plain no scent shave gels.


15 posted on 02/25/2015 1:39:56 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
ISIS is burning People alive and this is News. Stop the World, I want to get off.

It's a mad, mad, mad, mad, mad one, no?

16 posted on 02/25/2015 1:41:33 AM PST by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BJ1

You’ve bought into the lie.

Buying stuff on sale doesn’t necessarily “save” you money. That stuff takes up space in the house and if you’re worried about saving a little money chances are you’re not in a mansion with space to spare. Also requires good organization and knowing what you’ve got so you don’t overbuy and waste money on stuff you’ve already stocked up on.

There are other things to consider. I like bargains but the house can get cluttered with bargains thinking you’re coming out ahead. PLus $10 turning into $150 puts you down $150 in reality. Regardless that is debt. Not everyone can afford to have trips cost 10-20 times what they expected to pay even if stuff is on sale.


17 posted on 02/25/2015 1:44:45 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Well, the girls are a pre-built market for such amenities. [TG] If you want cost disparity, look at clothing prices...


18 posted on 02/25/2015 2:56:36 AM PST by W. (Dem0crat-mandated education reform killed American progress. Thanks, morons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed

Unit price isn’t the issue. It’s the number of products used to look your best.

I have one bottle of shampoo in the shower. Each woman in our family has ten bottles in the shower. Heaven help me if I accidentally bump one and set off the avalanche.

After the shower, a quick swipe with the razor, slap on some deodorant, drag a brush through the hair, scrub the teeth and I’m ready for the day — maybe a total of five products. Let’s see a woman do that!


19 posted on 02/25/2015 2:58:07 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative; All

I bet they never looked for the opposite phenomena.

On the other hand, how do they know that the products are identical? The packaging isn’t.

This is just Marxist philosophy, disguised as journalism.

Marxist dogma is that there is an “objective” value for everything.

That is entirely false. Value is a function of demand, sometimes on the micro level, and is mainly subjective.

How much is something worth? Whatever you can get someone to pay for it.


20 posted on 02/25/2015 2:59:15 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson