Sounds like Betty is smoking a certain crop and I don’t mean tobacco.
I read the headline, and instantly exclaimed AWWWW GEEEZ, NOT THIS BULL.... AGAIN!
This has to be the most absurd assertion I’ve ever seen in my life!
I just went outside a killed a dandelion ,that should put a stop the that nasty CO2
Since 1961, the production of these four crops in the Northern Hemisphere has jumped more than twice, leading to absorb a billion metric tons of carbon captured and released each year.
And they invoke "Basic research" ?
So, more C02 equals more food which equals more people which equals more c02.
Without saying so directly, they are saying that people are the problem.
"Never mind."
Nonsense. Plants fix more carbon and grow faster when there is more carbon dioxide in the air. Fungi also play a part which is never mentioned. The concentration of CO2 is 3-400ppb, a minuscule part of the air and not enough to effect climate. The real multiplier of heat is water—something the enviro wacks dare not touch as the very basis of life cannot be extirpated in their search of commie hell. But the entire premise is wrong; this is all political; hang on to your wallet—which is what they really want.
Would I be going out on a limb, if I said I believe these slime bags are lying out of a certain orifice?
Plants take in CO2 and create 0xygen in photosynthesis (as well as plant products— like corn, wheat etc. Respiration uses oxygen and gives off CO2, and this is a balanced two processes. The more C02 release.... the more oxygen is produced.
So this article is total BS and full of S.
They made fun of Reagan for saying this— and he was Right!
The real agenda is that they hate humanity, including themselves, and want us to off ourselves. Once you understand that, everything else makes sense.
Oh for God’s sake. Are we supposed to destroy all of our food now?
Can we please put all the libs, ELFS and PETA freaks on a rocket and send them to that comet? P.S. All the muzzies too.
I don’t see how crops are much different than any other plants that grow during the warmer months and die off in the winter.
They had to fund a study for that? I believe that stuff was in my 9th grade biology book.
They have it backwards. Raising CO2 increases crop production. That’s why they pump it into real greenhouses.
This isn’t the first time I’ve seen a science article written by someone not understanding the topic. It’s incompetent writing checked by an incompetent editor.
Wait, let me get this straight. Corn production makes more CO2? I thought growing corn to make ethanol was going to save us all.
When was the Law of Conservation of Matter repealed?
Wow man it's like the planet is breathing.