1 posted on
10/28/2014 12:58:36 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
2 posted on
10/28/2014 12:58:57 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: BenLurkin
In a row, or at once? Either way, it cures your prostate because it will kill you.
3 posted on
10/28/2014 12:59:31 PM PDT by
Vermont Lt
(Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
To: BenLurkin
Sounds like a classic "correlation does not prove causation" study to me. (or so my wife said...)
4 posted on
10/28/2014 1:00:52 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: BenLurkin
Is that in a day, a week, or a month? And does one have to keep up, er..., maintain that pace?
5 posted on
10/28/2014 1:00:53 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: BenLurkin
Not to gloat, but being a woman provides me 100% protection. And I don’t have to have sex with even one woman. (thank God!)
6 posted on
10/28/2014 1:01:47 PM PDT by
married21
( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
To: BenLurkin
“29% lower chance of developing prostate cancer”
because you die from STDs and arent around to develop prostrate cancer.
7 posted on
10/28/2014 1:01:53 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: BenLurkin
Other STD’s will kill you first?
8 posted on
10/28/2014 1:01:55 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: BenLurkin
Oh mrs p6....PHONE CALL FOR MRS P6!
10 posted on
10/28/2014 1:02:08 PM PDT by
prisoner6
(Stop the Stupid)
To: BenLurkin
Does it have to be all on one day, or can it be staggered? Not that my wife would ever allow me to complete this prostate cancer prevention regime.
11 posted on
10/28/2014 1:02:18 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FOR CHILDERS 2014 .... Don't reward bad GOPe behavior.)
To: BenLurkin
But, how does it know it’s another woman? I call BS.
To: BenLurkin
Well Bill Clinton is safe.
13 posted on
10/28/2014 1:02:53 PM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Not all Muslims are terrorists but all Muslims are potential terrorists.)
To: BenLurkin
So, heterosexual men who are promiscuous have healthier prostates and men who aren’t, don’t. Makes sense.
To: BenLurkin
According to new research published by the University of Montreal, men having sex with more than 20 women, have a 29% lower chance of developing prostate cancer, as opposed to men who have gone through 20 similar sexual experiences with other men.Having relations with a woman is in no way similar with having relations with a man. No similarity. Yuck!
17 posted on
10/28/2014 1:04:54 PM PDT by
The_Media_never_lie
(The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
To: BenLurkin
If my wife finds out, I wont live long enough to get cancer.
19 posted on
10/28/2014 1:05:18 PM PDT by
Springman
(Rest In Peace YaYa123, Bahbah, and Just Lori.)
To: Lazmataz
Congratulations, Laz!!!!
You’re the big winner.
20 posted on
10/28/2014 1:05:37 PM PDT by
SpinnerWebb
(IN-SAPORIBVS-SICVT-PVLLVM)
To: BenLurkin
If you read the article, the number of partners doesn’t really matter, it is the frequency of sexual relations. One partner many times is just as good as multiple partners. So all you wives out there need to remember to help your husband with his prostate health :-)
To: BenLurkin
as opposed to men who have gone through 20 similar sexual experiences with other men. WTF kind of study is this?
22 posted on
10/28/2014 1:06:11 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: BenLurkin
This story is not about prostate cancer, it is a propaganda piece that tries to pretend that men having sex with men is just a matter of personal preference.
23 posted on
10/28/2014 1:06:23 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
To: BenLurkin
Put a helmet on that soldier, he’s going into battle.
24 posted on
10/28/2014 1:06:26 PM PDT by
dainbramaged
(Get out of my country now)
To: BenLurkin
wonder what the doctor will put on the prescription for this treatment is it covered by obamacare?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson