on which Federal building in Washington D.C. does this statue of moses Holding The TEN COMMANDMENTS exist??
Tell the judge to shove it up his smelly Obamahole.
Really.
Where does this dork live?
Watch him, hound him, make his life a living hell.
It’s long past time we give back to liberals what they’ve been giving to us.
Now, Bloonmfielders, go to it.
Make this man regret he didn’t go into a useful profession.
Tell the judge to bring his forklift and remove it himself.
oh, not this crap again.
But, we’ll see where this goes in court.
A few years ago, the Supreme Court ruled on 10 Commandment monuments in a pair of cases.
In one case, they agreed that 10 Commandments had to be removed from a Kentucky courthouse. In the other, they ruled that the 10 Commandments were allowed to stay on the Texas Capitol grounds.
So, the court precedents in this area are muddled. We’ll see.
Nothing.
Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005).
Great opportunity for Susana Martinez to teach Americans a valuable civics lesson by refusing to obey the orders and reminding folks that Federal judges have no jurisdiction over the states on religious matters.
For 2,000+ years in any civilized society - those commandments have been the basis for the law - as they are in the US today:
I am the Lord thy God, ... Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven images.
Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.
Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long.
Thou shalt not kill.
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Thou shalt not steal.
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house.
Ungrateful, ignorant slobs who have no respect for religious persons and want to impose their lack of spirituality and decency on others. Ironic ain’t it?
Tell the judge if they remove the Law of God, then there is no law and he/she/it is out of a job.
Time to tell a federal judge to pound sand. Sooner or later someone will. Maybe Bloomfield should start a trend.
Parker was nominated to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico by President Ronald Reagan on July 10, 1987.
NM has gone all California on us. Hope TEXAS stalls the eastward advance.
... and the forced removal has the principal effect of endorsing atheism, which is itself a religion!
Screw you, Judge.
Judge needs to go.
Records of the Continental Congress in the Constitutional Convention, July 27, 1787
Last I checked (and putting aside the obvious Article X challenges), the First Amendment doesn’t mention “endorsing” religion.
Curious if Atheism was included in the list of established religions the Atheists, and their bff’s at the ACLU could be stopped on this recurring matter due prejudice?
IF Islam IS a religion, then the word is cheapened as it is, therefore no harm done addressing Atheism as a religion, and a tool is created to stop them.
Just a thought in hopes of finding a way to stop the nonsense. It seems to be a game with them anymore. Tear down the established World for the fun of it game.
When will the government stop endorsing, even establishing the religion of atheism to the exclusion of all others?