To: FlingWingFlyer; bmwcyle; Telepathic Intruder; Triple; Chode
This article reiterates the 'rubble pile' explanation, but notes that one end is lower density than the other. That could be suggestive of water ice. My view is that all the Earth-crossers formerly were part of now-extinct comets.
KEYWORDS: asteroid;
asteroiditokawa;
hayabusa;
itokawa
8 posted on
02/09/2014 1:01:30 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
To: SunkenCiv
that's a valid explanation
9 posted on
02/09/2014 1:10:59 PM PST by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
To: SunkenCiv
That’s interesting, actually. Then they’re constantly being replenished even with the occasional Tunguska event. There’s just a tiny whisper of gravity holding asteroids together, however. Low density does not necessarily imply light elements.
10 posted on
02/09/2014 1:29:47 PM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: SunkenCiv
This article reiterates the 'rubble pile' explanation, but notes that one end is lower density than the other. That could be suggestive of water ice. My view is that all the Earth-crossers formerly were part of now-extinct comets. Unfortunately for your theory, every comet we've analyzed or visited has shown essentially zero water. . . and is indistinguishable from any other asteroid except for orbit and electrical charge.
19 posted on
02/09/2014 2:50:23 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson