Smoker alert. Not that I buy them there anyway. Will they soon be stocking mj in their place. After all it's only for medicinal purposes in most place. For now.
1 posted on
02/05/2014 7:10:38 AM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
I would venture to guess that the stock holders are not happy campers today!
To: rktman
Yep. Stoners soon to be everywhere. More easy to steer and control if they are high all the time. Millions of experiences have proved it time and time again. I know some think it doesn’t affect their behavior, judgment, body, or their coordination but they are deluded. We all make excuses for our bad habits to justify them.
To: rktman
When I was smoking, I found CVS seemed to keep their stocks fresh. Whether due to the volume of sales or better inventory management, I don’t know.
I’d gotten some awful tasting packs from random gas stations so I started using CVS. Didn’t hurt that they were right down the street either.
Wish one of the chains would jump on the e-cigs bandwagon with some force. I have to order the stuff online and it sucks running out if I’m not on top of it. If that industry would adopt some interchangeability standards, I think they’d take off. But that’s probably off topic.
4 posted on
02/05/2014 7:18:01 AM PST by
chrisser
(Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
To: rktman
This really sucks! I for one enjoyed the convenience of buying my inhaler, filling my COPD script and purchasing my cigarettes all in one place.
7 posted on
02/05/2014 7:19:35 AM PST by
11th Commandment
(http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
To: rktman
The convenience store across the street just got happy....
9 posted on
02/05/2014 7:25:13 AM PST by
freebilly
To: rktman
The old mom-and-pop pharmacies I used to frequent never did sell cigarettes to begin with. Thus, they were never something I would expect to see in a drug store to begin with.
10 posted on
02/05/2014 7:25:36 AM PST by
greene66
To: rktman
Dollar General sells smokes.
12 posted on
02/05/2014 7:27:49 AM PST by
waterhill
(I Shall Remain, in spite of __________.)
To: rktman
But will they still stock the morning after pill for teens?
13 posted on
02/05/2014 7:28:51 AM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: rktman
That’s kind of amazing, as I’m sure tobacco is a big profit item.
Imagine how big govt deficits would be without tobacco taxes and payments?
14 posted on
02/05/2014 7:30:21 AM PST by
nascarnation
(I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
To: rktman
Controversial? lol. You can’t make this crap up. That has literally made my day. We are so done as a country. It is over folks....pack up and leave. Last one out, shut the door and turn out the lights. We are officially done.
15 posted on
02/05/2014 7:30:23 AM PST by
napscoordinator
( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
To: rktman
Who smokes these days? I’d wager it is less than 10 percent of the populace. Mostly junior high students and elderly Chinese women.
To: rktman
but birth control and abortion pills for kids are not controversial at all?
18 posted on
02/05/2014 7:32:47 AM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: rktman
When do they start addressing abuse of prescription narcotics?
20 posted on
02/05/2014 7:47:47 AM PST by
Clay Moore
("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." ~Voltaire)
To: rktman
I find it interesting that all the same people celebrating this move by CVS are the same that are all in for weed. Why is a cigerette evil and pot something we need to advance? Seems a little inconsistent.
22 posted on
02/05/2014 7:53:51 AM PST by
ilgipper
(Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
To: rktman
Way back when I worked in a chain drug store, we had a lot of customers who came in
only for tobacco. I don't know about now, but in those days, the pharmacy was the most profitable part of the drug store.
The reasoning behind selling cheap smokes was that we were developing future customers for the pharmacy. I know it sounds cruel, but it was sound business. If people bought their smokes at your drug store, chances were pretty good that they would also eventually buy their respiratory medicine (if they kept up the habit) or smoking cessation aids (if they didn't).
You aren't going to get people to quit smoking because you stop selling tobacco products at your store. You will, however, probably get them to take their tobacco and other business elsewhere. I guess that's a good move if you have so many customers you can afford to lose 25% of them.
24 posted on
02/05/2014 7:58:47 AM PST by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: rktman
Depending on their motive here I may or may not have a problem with this.If their motive is positive PR then OK,they experience the benefits,and drawbacks,on their profit and loss spreadsheets.If it's because their legal department advised it for some reason I see that as an indictment of our legal systems and juries.If it's a government mandate I say “**** you,Rat Party scum”.
25 posted on
02/05/2014 8:04:31 AM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
To: rktman
Just a side note: When Christine (the Idiot) was governor of WA, she increased the tobacco tax dramatically. What happened was that the stores lost sales. Here in Yakima the estimate that I heard was 10000 cartons a month.
Where did they go? To the Reservation.
26 posted on
02/05/2014 8:32:20 AM PST by
Parmy
To: rktman
Has SMOKE ever been considered a drug delivery method in modern medicine? In the past yes! But not today! I wonder what the effect of MJ smoke in the rectum would be?
30 posted on
02/05/2014 8:47:08 AM PST by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
To: rktman
Not to worry. They can always make up for lost tobacco sales with marijuana sales.
35 posted on
02/06/2014 2:22:15 PM PST by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson