Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More consumption not necessary for human well-being, says UN report
EurActiv ^ | 24 January 2014

Posted on 01/25/2014 2:05:58 AM PST by Olog-hai

Greater food system efficiency and curbs to the expansion of cropland are necessary to prevent the collapse of global ecosystems, says a report presented today (24 January) by the UN at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

The report, by the UN Environment Program’s science think tank the International Resource Panel (IRP), says that policymakers must break the link between greater resource consumption and human well-being.

The authors say that rising demand for food could lead to a 320 to 850 million hectare expansion of global cropland, putting greater strain of the environment’s capacity for regeneration. …

(Excerpt) Read more at euractiv.com ...


TOPICS: Agriculture; Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Food
KEYWORDS: consumption; ecosystems; liberalagenda; un; unep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2014 2:05:59 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Bureaucrats know everything! No need to ask experts.


2 posted on 01/25/2014 2:07:33 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

The UN even uses their own term “policymakers” to describe them (obviously a synonym for “politician”).


3 posted on 01/25/2014 2:09:25 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Translation: Starve, peasants!


4 posted on 01/25/2014 2:09:36 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Jealousy is when you count someone else's blessings instead of your own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Even though barring an extinction event, or mass population die-off due to whatever causes (which will inevitably be government-caused), we shouldn’t expand the amount of crops we grow?


5 posted on 01/25/2014 2:09:53 AM PST by wastedyears (The Ender's Game movie was a stupendous, colossal, galactic failure to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Another attack on suburban living. We all have to be crowded into high rise city ghettos to save space and the environment. I hate the UN


6 posted on 01/25/2014 2:27:23 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
the UN at the World Economic Forum

BWHAHAA IS THIS SOME SORT OF BIZARRE GLOBAL JOKSTER OUTFIT..?

UN AND WORLD ECONOMIC WHUT?
7 posted on 01/25/2014 2:37:10 AM PST by jimsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The authors say that rising demand for food could lead to a 320 to 850 million hectare expansion of global cropland, putting greater strain of the environment’s capacity for regeneration.

So now vegetables are bad for the environment? I'll add it to the list along with cows, etc.

8 posted on 01/25/2014 2:46:33 AM PST by Flick Lives (Got a problem with the government? Have a complaint. Get a free IRS audit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The authors say that rising demand for food could lead to a 320 to 850 million hectare expansion of global cropland . . .

The authors are totally clueless. Rising yields per acre lead to lower food costs, allowing the world to support its growing populations. Total global cropland has been dropping steadily for generations, and if these people read in their own field they would know that.

9 posted on 01/25/2014 3:01:25 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Their next slogan is, “Tree bark, the other dark meat!”


10 posted on 01/25/2014 3:15:16 AM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

> Greater food system efficiency and curbs to the expansion of cropland are necessary to prevent the collapse of global ecosystems

Instead, the bodies of jackasses who write such nonsense should be fertilizing our food crops.


11 posted on 01/25/2014 4:05:29 AM PST by SunkenCiv (;http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; All

The UN...at the big annual meeting of Globalists and Free Traders at Davos...has just announced it is planning to starve a lot of people

More reason to eradicate Globalism from America. George Washington was so correct about America getting involved in foreign entanglements


12 posted on 01/25/2014 4:15:49 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (Amnesty And Not Ending ObamaCare Will Kill GOP In 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimsin

Supporters of Free Trade Globaism are the biggest supporters of the UN...and vice versa


13 posted on 01/25/2014 4:17:36 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (Amnesty And Not Ending ObamaCare Will Kill GOP In 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

“Total global cropland has been dropping steadily for generations...”

It is truly amazing, just in my short life, how much prior producing farmland has now gone into dormant pastureland.


14 posted on 01/25/2014 4:28:55 AM PST by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

15 posted on 01/25/2014 5:18:22 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
This is the organization that believes "communism" is the only way to save humanity.
16 posted on 01/25/2014 6:27:09 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A Malthusian catastrophe (also known as Malthusian check) was originally foreseen to be a forced return to subsistence-level conditions once population growth had outpaced agricultural production.

Looks like the UN would like to force that upon us.


17 posted on 01/25/2014 6:33:04 AM PST by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Every year California loses a large amount of farmland to salinization. That is, irrigation water deposits a small amount of salt in land that over the course of decades eventually makes the land too salty to farm.

The way to desalinize land is to flood it with water for several weeks, until the salts are carried far below where crop roots would go. The process is slightly accelerated by using mostly salt free water.

In turn, the way to provide this much low salt water is through desalinization plants. Normally these are energy intensive, but recent developments in nanotechnology has resulted in highly efficient and low maintenance water filters, that use only a quarter of the energy of typical reverse osmosis.

While California would be unwilling to do something so sensible as to provide itself with a vast amount of fresh water, Texas should consider this immediately. This is because they have vast amounts of energy in the form of natural gas, that is often treated as a waste product of oil production.


18 posted on 01/25/2014 6:47:49 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
rising demand for food

The vast majority of any increase in demand for food is not for food for people. It's for food for animals, which are then fed to people.

Depending on the animal and other factors, it takes 4 to considerably more than 10 calories of plant foods otherwise edible by humans to produce one calorie of meat edible by people. IOW, sometimes like 5x to 15x the amount of land to feed the same number of people.

This expansion in meat production is of course a very good thing indeed, since it is caused by billions of people around the world climbing above absolute poverty in the last few decades. One of the very first things people do when they reach this point is to eat more meat.

19 posted on 01/25/2014 7:35:14 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

People living in cities are much more easily controlled. If the peasants don’t behave, stop shipping in food, taint the water, stop picking up trash or plowing streets for a while. They will come around in a hurry.


20 posted on 01/25/2014 7:37:23 AM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson