Skip to comments.
Ice Station "Global Warming" Speaks [Semi-Vanity Title]
The Australasian Antarctic Expedition (Web Site) ^
| 1/5/14
| Chris Turney
Posted on 01/05/2014 6:18:58 AM PST by SES1066
[Carbon Off-Set:] A total of 800 kauri trees will be planted which during the first 50 years of their life will offset more than the total carbon used to fuel the AAE. Kauri of course lives much longer than this and is even known to reach ages of more than 2,000 years. The amount of carbon assimilated by the trees was calculated using the kauri growth calculator based on many field studies and research.
(Excerpt) Read more at spiritofmawson.com ...
TOPICS: Outdoors; Science; Society; Weather
KEYWORDS: antarctica; icebreakers; rescue
This is from their website. A news article on Drudge that cannot be excerpted here (New Zealand Herald) made mention of the now increased need for further Carbon Offset due to 3 added ships involved in the rescue. My added question is this, why do so many people equate planting a tree with a tree growing to maturity? Every time I see some idiot talking about a tree being used to mitigate some carbon-producing activity, I want to ask, are you making the commitment to grow that number of trees to maturity, taking into account replacing failed seedlings? Or is it just a feel-good "See what a good guy/gal I am"?
1
posted on
01/05/2014 6:18:58 AM PST
by
SES1066
To: SES1066
Who's to say those trees won't be harvested in a few years and the carbon held hostage in them set FREE?
ManBearPig Jr.
2
posted on
01/05/2014 6:30:45 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: SES1066
How many kauri trees will need to be planted to carbon offset the fossil fuel burned by THREE rescue ships (Chinese, Australian, and now the American Polar Star)? Oh, and don’t forget the fossil fuel burned by the Chinese helicopter lifting the Ship of Fools passengers off the ice.
3
posted on
01/05/2014 6:36:56 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(ObamaCare PAID Enrollment Prediction: 66,666)
To: PJ-Comix
Is this the same ship that almost got stuck in the arctic last summer? Are the yachts still frozen in in the Arctic.
4
posted on
01/05/2014 6:47:02 AM PST
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: SES1066
Ice Station
-Zebra- JACKASS!!!
5
posted on
01/05/2014 7:05:07 AM PST
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
To: SES1066
Why did this ship of fools need to go to Antarctica as readily available satellite imagery would have shown the Antarctic ice is growing not shrinking? Strange how the media is not reporting that these idiots went to Antarctica expecting to see melting glaciers and instead were trapped by massive ice that stymied the efforts of two other ice breakers to rescue them. If there is any better example of how global warming has become a religion is that these fools feel compelled to atone for their carbon sins by planting trees to appease the global warming gods.
To: Paladin2
Lol! But even so, it points out the stupidity of their argument.
Even if we accept their theory that “carbon offsets” makes any sense, it’s basically saying that it’s OK to screw things up today as long as you make it right, eventually.
It’s like stealing a car while leaving an annuity that puts $10 a month into a savings account so in 50 years the person you stole it from will have enough to go buy a replacement.
7
posted on
01/05/2014 8:08:37 AM PST
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: SES1066
The whole idea of carbon offsets due to planting trees is nonsensical. Look at anywhere on earth where there are warm temperatures and water. It's GREEN. That's right, stuff grows where there's water and warmth. Enough stuff grows to mostly utilize all of the available water, nutrients, and warmth. All anyone does by planting something different is slightly alter the time delay before the carbon is returned. A tree stores carbon until the wood rots. The carbon in weeds usually returns to the atmosphere quickly.
The only way to delay it longer is to bury the carbon somewhere where it won't return to the atmosphere quickly. That's why you should send your old newspapers to a landfill rather than recycle them.
8
posted on
01/05/2014 8:29:30 AM PST
by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
To: bigbob
"so in 50 years the person you stole it from will have enough to go buy a replacement."
Yup; "We need action NOW!"
9
posted on
01/05/2014 9:12:34 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: All
He should plant a whole forest and name it “Ship of Fools”...:^)
10
posted on
01/05/2014 11:01:20 AM PST
by
az_gila
To: Paladin2
If you want to fix the earth’s carbon balance, grow fast growing trees that store carbon quickly, then chop them down and bury them — deep. Then plant more.
11
posted on
01/05/2014 11:45:27 AM PST
by
motor_racer
(Who will bell the cat?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson