Skip to comments.
The Debate Is Over: Popular Science Does Away With Comments
The Gateway Pundit ^
| 9-25-2013
| William Teach
Posted on 09/25/2013 2:09:52 PM PDT by servo1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Ditto
It went downhill 25+ years ago around the same time that National Geographic did.That was even before NASA was destroyed by the scumbag lefties.
To: abclily
22
posted on
09/25/2013 6:39:21 PM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear.)
To: servo1969
Pop Sci turned into a liberal rag years ago. I read and enjoyed it for the first two or three decades of my life but thought Pop Mech had better plans and projects.
I gave up on both at least 20 years ago.
The vintage issues are the best.
To: Telepathic Intruder
There is a 100% consensus of total agreement with global warming among everyone who matters. The deniers simply arent smart enough to know that global warming doesnt necessarily mean warmer temperatures or more hurricanes. Sometimes its warmer, other times colder. Sometimes there are more hurricanes, sometimes less. The very fact that it cant be predicted proves that global warming is out of control.That sounds like the statement from a delusional sociopath. Certainly not anyone versed in any science I know.
That last sentence sounds like something Al Gore or James Hansen would say. Not anywhere on my list of notable scientists of 20th Century.
24
posted on
09/25/2013 10:02:15 PM PDT
by
publius911
(Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
To: DakotaGator
Some years back Popular Science's then new editor proudly announced in the magazine how it, meaning they, would immediately become proponents of scientific political issues. I am surprised it is still a viable publication.
I did not keep track, but I stopped reading Popular Science about the same time, probably for the same reason in the same issue.
Militant advocacy of "scientific political issues" and actual science is an oxymoron.
25
posted on
09/25/2013 10:18:28 PM PDT
by
publius911
(Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
To: Ditto
It went downhill 25+ years ago around the same time that National Geographic did. I canceled my subscriptions to both after the hard left took them over and they became political propaganda operations masquerading as science. I just realized, since it was a long time ago that I cancelled my subscription. We should add the former "Scientific American" to the suicidal formerly respected publications.
26
posted on
09/25/2013 10:39:25 PM PDT
by
publius911
(Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
To: publius911
Your;
"Militant advocacy of "scientific political issues" and actual science is an oxymoron."Well said!
27
posted on
09/26/2013 4:30:29 AM PDT
by
DakotaGator
(Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
To: Tax-chick
Science progresses funeral by funeral.
- - Max Planck
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.
- - Max Planck
28
posted on
09/27/2013 9:29:35 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(So Obama "inherited" a mess? Firemen "inherit" messes too. Ever see one put gasoline on it?)
To: SamAdams76
Just a few hundred years ago, most scientists of the day refused to consider the notion that the earth might be round instead of flat."1,500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was the center of the universe. 500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was flat. And 15 minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow."
- - Agent K from Men In Black
29
posted on
09/27/2013 9:33:23 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(So Obama "inherited" a mess? Firemen "inherit" messes too. Ever see one put gasoline on it?)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
A few years ago under the previous editor in chief, PopSci devoted an entire issue to Al Gore and the Demagogic Party. The ever-shrinking magazine has switched editors, but too little, too late.
Thanks servo1969.
30
posted on
10/05/2013 2:58:37 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson