Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Debate Is Over: Popular Science Does Away With Comments
The Gateway Pundit ^ | 9-25-2013 | William Teach

Posted on 09/25/2013 2:09:52 PM PDT by servo1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Ditto
It went downhill 25+ years ago around the same time that National Geographic did.

That was even before NASA was destroyed by the scumbag lefties.

21 posted on 09/25/2013 6:16:39 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: abclily

The world’s a speck? That’s a cue for a song...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmfAyK6CeIg


22 posted on 09/25/2013 6:39:21 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Pop Sci turned into a liberal rag years ago. I read and enjoyed it for the first two or three decades of my life but thought Pop Mech had better plans and projects.

I gave up on both at least 20 years ago.

The vintage issues are the best.


23 posted on 09/25/2013 9:06:51 PM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
There is a 100% consensus of total agreement with global warming among everyone who matters. The deniers simply aren’t smart enough to know that global warming doesn’t necessarily mean warmer temperatures or more hurricanes. Sometimes it’s warmer, other times colder. Sometimes there are more hurricanes, sometimes less. The very fact that it can’t be predicted proves that global warming is out of control.

That sounds like the statement from a delusional sociopath. Certainly not anyone versed in any science I know.
That last sentence sounds like something Al Gore or James Hansen would say. Not anywhere on my list of notable scientists of 20th Century.

24 posted on 09/25/2013 10:02:15 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
Some years back Popular Science's then new editor proudly announced in the magazine how it, meaning they, would immediately become proponents of scientific political “issues”.

I am surprised it is still a viable publication.
I did not keep track, but I stopped reading Popular Science about the same time, probably for the same reason in the same issue.

Militant advocacy of "scientific political issues" and actual science is an oxymoron.

25 posted on 09/25/2013 10:18:28 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
It went downhill 25+ years ago around the same time that National Geographic did. I canceled my subscriptions to both after the hard left took them over and they became political propaganda operations masquerading as science.

I just realized, since it was a long time ago that I cancelled my subscription. We should add the former "Scientific American" to the suicidal formerly respected publications.

26 posted on 09/25/2013 10:39:25 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: publius911
Your; "Militant advocacy of "scientific political issues" and actual science is an oxymoron."

Well said!

27 posted on 09/26/2013 4:30:29 AM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
“Science progresses funeral by funeral.”
- - Max Planck

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
- - Max Planck

28 posted on 09/27/2013 9:29:35 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (So Obama "inherited" a mess? Firemen "inherit" messes too. Ever see one put gasoline on it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Just a few hundred years ago, most scientists of the day refused to consider the notion that the earth might be round instead of flat.

"1,500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was the center of the universe. 500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was flat. And 15 minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow."
- - Agent K from Men In Black

29 posted on 09/27/2013 9:33:23 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (So Obama "inherited" a mess? Firemen "inherit" messes too. Ever see one put gasoline on it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

A few years ago under the previous editor in chief, PopSci devoted an entire issue to Al Gore and the Demagogic Party. The ever-shrinking magazine has switched editors, but too little, too late.

Thanks servo1969.


30 posted on 10/05/2013 2:58:37 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson