Skip to comments.Do Gay Men Have a Genetic Advantage Over Straight Men in Building Successful Careers?
Posted on 07/12/2013 10:31:02 AM PDT by pinochet
Gay people make up only 2 percent of the people in society. How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations?
I am aware that social conservatives are uncomfortable discussing genetic reasons, because it gives gay radicals an excuse to engage in sin. But acknowledging a genetic factor does not remove moral responsibility from gay people, and they remain under obligation to engage in Biblical sexual behavior. Gays will be put in the same situation as married men who are faithful to their wives, despite the fact that they are genetically inclined to be attracted to women that they are not married to.
Nobody can deny the fact that, despite gays being 2 percent of the entire population, they are heavily represented among the elites in America and other Western nations. Some men look more "manly" than other men, while some women look more "feminine" than other women. In the fashion industry, the latest trend in modelling are the androgynous men - a group of men who look so feminine, that they have successful careers as female models. These are not the Transgender men who get breast implants and inject themselves with female hormones. These are everyday guys who look so feminine, that they can just put on a wig and look exactly like women. One of the most famous is an Australian model known as Andrej Pejic, who let his hair grow long, and he models women's clothing. Here is a website showing the fashion magazines he has appeared in: http://andrejpejicofficial.com/gallery/
I suspect that these androgynous men have the ability to think like both men and women. This gives them an advantage in advancing their careers and building businesses. I love Free Republic, because it is a venue where manly men can talk about manly things, without being intimidated by the left. But how many Freeper men can work as interior decorators? How many can work as hair dressers? How many can design clothes? How many can become ballet dancers? How many can become Hollywood screen writers, who can write scripts for movies that can make women cry? How many can direct Broadway plays? These are career paths that can take a sissy man from a working class background, and put him in contact with rich and powerful people who help to make public policy.
Those "sissy" talents are also useful in "regular" jobs such as selling insurance policies. A regular "manly" man is able to understand the minds of men, and is able to sell to 50 percent of the population. Because the "sissy man" is able to understand the minds of 100 percent of the population, he can sell twice as much insurance, giving him a better chance of becoming CEO of the insurance company. Those "sissy" talents may also be helpful in getting senior clerical positions in churches, in politics, in the media, etc.
Yes. They like kissing butt and they do it with much more gusto than any straight man.
What about the Manly Women who end up as the head of DHS?
Only if they’re running a salon or boutique.
Not having to leave the office on time because wife and kids are expecting you at home makes more.
No, but they are far less likely to have the predictable series of female love interests who invariably drain the finances of young normal men that are attempting to launch their financial future.
I’ve found that it depends on the industry. In a male-dominated industry with logical components such as IT, I find that manly men are seen as more intelligent, stable, and capable in their field.
In industries such as education, effeminate men have an advantage. The women who interview them relate to them on a different level than a gruff and tumbled man. I interviewed for jobs as an educator, but as a 6’2”, 350 lb. with a shaved head and goatee, I was generally seen as intimidating and hard than for the soft-hearted person I am. In general, women want to work with men they can manipulate (my wife has stated this on numerous occasions). Male managers, on the other hand, want a guy who can take the ball and run with it with little need for drama or education.
I kid, I kid
That is probably more important than any other factor.
Two living as one. No child support. No alimony(just yet). Closed community, helping the like minded
What freakin’ “genetic factor?” What’s your proof?
Especially when the boss is a pillow biting twinky too.
No kids to support - no wife to take care of - no conventional moral limits. In an ‘earthly way’ there’s no reason they should be able to grab more ‘stuff’.
I think your theory is all wet. Single men don’t have to please a wife and can therefore devote all of their attention to their careers. Furthermore (if they llive with another guy) the salaries of the two of them (with no kids to support) can afford a nicer house and a fancier lifestyle, if that is what they want.
Moreover, I think that your categorization of “sissy” careers is ridiculous. I’ve known many “all male” hairdressers, for instance.
My niece told me about a phenomenon in college that she called “LUGs” (Lesbian Until Graduation)
The LUGs quickly found that being a lesbian carried a lot of advantages among professors who saw them as “brave” and tended to grade more easily. Housing was easier for them because no one wanted to risk being labeled homophobic or worse.
A gay guy walks into a bar already on Third Base.
Many small minorities operate in this manner, including Jews in goy countries, Catholics in predominantly Protestant countries, and Freemasons in many societies.
This is the point blank explaination why men “generally” make more in salary than women. No maternity leave, no “little Johnny’s sick so I have to stay home” or other excuses that require them to come late/leave early, or be absent all together.
Homosexuality is a developmental disorder. There is no homosexual gene. Genetically they are identical to heterosexuals. Not having to deal with women or children saves a lot of time and money they can devote to their careers.
Do psychopaths have an advantage in business negotiations?
Until a few hundred years ago, there was a class of men called eunuchs. Enough of them to create their own sub-culture in Muslim societies, as non-threating servants of royal courts.
I don’t think so. I think it’s more a symptom of a rotting culture.
How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations?Has to do with the god of this world (2 Cor 4:4). He still has a lot of power and can give it to whomever he pleases (Luke 4:6).
Well of course sweetie...
Homosexuals are sort of a natural mafia.
They’ve learned to manipulate guilt.
If two “heads” are better than one!
“But acknowledging a genetic factor does not remove moral responsibility from gay people, “
THERE IS NO GAY GENE, and talking around it as if there is (to get people to accept homosexuality) is not a valid argument.
Very plausible theory. At an Air base I worked out, the base commander was a Mormon. Pretty soon there was quite a few Mormon officers assigned to the base. This continued for several years because there was also a Mormon presence in the German Community. Like tends to promote like.
Might as well ask how did so many politically correct liberals get infiltrated into the corporate world such that they can drive gay pride advertising, the abortion agenda, open borders, global warming legislation, and “green” culture.
The Socialist fifth column has been on the march since the end of the WWII.
It makes sense for jobs in media (news, films, TV) and we all know how much power the media yields today.
Gays have the aid of guilty liberals in the media and politics...No way could they do it on their own!
What kind of bar?
Homosexuals have gained power in other societies throughout history. Homosexuals were the power elite in Sodom and Gomorrah, Rome at the time of the fall of the Roman Empire, Germany under the rule of the National Socialists and other civilizations.
When homosexuals gain disproportionate power and influence it is a sure sign that a society is decadent and corrupt.
this is the homo-agenda narative. Demand rights, demant acceptance them make it mandatory.
They are expendable drones with no family ties. Mere hedonists who work for their bread and circuses.
Hello, Yehuda! I’ve noticed in recent years that the gays have dropped the gay gene lie. This came when it was suggested to them that it would increase abortions of gay guys. They dropped it like a hot potato.
No, but they do identify each other and promote each other to the top.
I have seen it in government all over. A gay manager will pick another gay applicant who is far less qualified than a non-gay
Once they achieve critical mass, they take over and implement other gay policies (see: Boy Scouts, Academia, Military, Media)
Affirmative Action has been very good to homosexuals, women and Blacks.
Pray for America to Wake Up
ROTFL! How many want to?
Those "sissy" talents are also useful in "regular" jobs such as selling insurance policies. A regular "manly" man is able to understand the minds of men, and is able to sell to 50 percent of the population. Because the "sissy man" is able to understand the minds of 100 percent of the population, he can sell twice as much insurance, giving him a better chance of becoming CEO of the insurance company. Those "sissy" talents may also be helpful in getting senior clerical positions in churches, in politics, in the media, etc.?
I think your argument has some serious flaws to work through.
While there are more male geniuses than females, there are also more men than women who are profoundly stupid.
The maladaptive reproductive effects of homosexuality may have been masked in the past by strong social pressures to appear heterosexual.
Gays with higher average intelligence were able to out-compete the bottom tier of men in resource acquisition and social climbing. Then they went against their desire and married women purely as a way of maintaining their social standing within the group.
They have more time to devote to their careers, because they don’t have to be concerned about family.
That's cuz it's true
And it was only recently that I realized how valuable a MARRIED man is to a hiring manager vs. a single man. Married men tend to be more stable and reliable as workers. As I was married just a year ago but in a monogamous relationship longer than that, my hiring manager saw me to be more stable than a recent divorcee and a recent college grad. He was probably right!
This is just stupid.
Have a good product at a good price and you can sell. This whole “sissy man” concept is ridiculous
I disagree- I think homosexuality is genetic
I saw a lesbo meeting at a local park once and you would swear half of them were men!
They have female chromosomes, but too many male hormones or something... it is not ALL ‘choice’ (yes, some is)
Yes, Mormons are another good example.
1. Fewer days lost due to sick children.
2. Well developed acting skills (also why so many in Hollywood) as they learned to hide by acting normal from an early age on.
3. Higher levels of sociopaths in positions of power, both because they tend to enjoy manipulating others and because they tend to make business decisions based on, well, business, rather than emotional connections to employees and customers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.