Skip to comments.Feminist Suggests Sex Strike to Force Men to Support Abortion
Posted on 07/02/2013 8:11:24 PM PDT by Morgana
Misanthropic feminists are at it again. HuffPos Vivian Norris just suggested a sex strike in Texas to pressure male voters into giving in to the feminist agenda (aka abortion on demand er, womens healthcare.)
Deeply disgruntled that Texas might pass a bill banning abortions after 20 weeks, Norris urged Texas women to force men to vote for pro-choice agendas in the future by refusing to have intercourse with them this summer. Dont give in if your man, boyfriend, husband, toyboy is not voting for your best interests, your reproductive health do not sleep with that man! ranted Norris. I dont care how cute or charming he is! I dont care if he is your husband of many years. Resist! Go swimming! Meditate!
Much of her article was spent praising radical pro-abortion legislator Wendy Davis and decrying Texas as a patriarchal society where men still run the show, and oppress women. Men in Texas who have not woken up and smelled the coffee simply do not deserve any loving, she raved. I mean they really do not respect nor listen to women, she went on, There is a breed of Texas male who simply does not hear women. Womens voices remind them of terrorists.
You can buy a gun easier than you can get reproductive health care, she whined (because feminists are grumpy about how its so much harder to kill a baby than to buy a gun in Texas). She threw in a jab at President Bush for good measure: Remember what happened last time when a Texas good ole boy governor took that patriarchy all the way to become President of the United States. Stop the damage now and take back Texas.
What about Texas pro-life women? Apparently theyre just oppressed by the patriarchy and thats the only reason they fight for the lives of children in the womb or encourage chastity: These women, like women who hurt other women everywhere by criticizing and judging them, need to wake up as well. Women hurting other women is suicidal. Women who play into the hand of patriarchy need to be shown the way out of that prison, insisted Norris.
So apparently, she thinks the screaming mob that blocked the abortion bill last time around wasnt quite radical enough. But feminists are all about power, so its not really a shocker that feminists would want to use sex as a power weapon. Because using your sexuality to manipulate people doesnt objectify or degrade women at all. Right?
I believe that men are more likely to support abortion than women anyway though
Using sex to manipulate someone is in fact a form of witchcraft...
Hitlery will not be happy.
Pff... if women were actually capable of holding out, the whole world would be different.
anytime a woman with her sick attitudes
doesn’t want to spend any time with me
Life is too short to waste trying to help people with such deep sicko ideas. I’m not a psychiatrist...
If men can do NOTHING at all to prevent a woman from having an abortion, why are these women so concerned about getting men to support it?
During the “Women’s March” in NYC in 1970, a sign carried by many marchers read... “No Piece ‘Till There’s Peace!”
The women in our country are completely out of control and have been for about four decades now. I’m not blaming the women, but I need to ask: where are their fathers, their brothers, their husbands?
That’s right - if feminists could keep their pants on they wouldn’t have a reason to want abortions.
Hey Vivian, I agree never to have sex with you.
It takes two to tango. Guys should keep their pants zipped up. That is half this abortion war.
Exactly, those women wouldn't need abortions if they had some self control.
Not being a man, I am not really able to comment beyond this: why would any man want to have sex with a feminist abortion loving woman?
Hence the term lesbos (I think) something about a Greek story were all the women went to an island.
If men just could keep it zipped up.
Really, if people were monogamist and sex were only in marriage disease and unwanted babies would not even be an issue.
“Not being a man, I am not really able to comment beyond this: why would any man want to have sex with a feminist abortion loving woman?”
Same reason as her, no responsibility just free sex. He also does not have to pay child support.
I know some men who would say men should put a thumpin’ on feminists to force them to abandon infanticide. It would have the added benefit of teaching feminists what it really means to force someone to do something, a lesson they have obviously never suffered.
That is exactly what I was thinking. I would not have sex with anyone who was not my wife and my wife opposed abortion.
That sounds like a very good idea. If these women who support abortion or infanticide as I call it, refuse to have sex then they will not have abortions.
Do they not know how babies are made?
You say no I say good bye.
SO, grasp the brim, you, Lampito, and all.
You, Calonice, repeat for the rest
Each word I say. Then you must all take oath
And pledge your arms to the same stern conditions—
To husband or lover I’ll not open arms
_To husband or lover I’ll not open arms_
Though love and denial may enlarge his charms.
_Though love and denial may enlarge his charms._
O, O, my knees are failing me, Lysistrata!
But still at home, ignoring him, I’ll stay,
_But still at home, ignoring him, I’ll stay,_
Beautiful, clad in saffron silks all day.
_Beautiful, clad in saffron silks all day._
If then he seizes me by dint of force,
_If then he seizes me by dint of force,_
I’ll give him reason for a long remorse.
_I’ll give him reason for a long remorse._
I’ll never lie and stare up at the ceiling,
_I’ll never lie and stare up at the ceiling,_
Nor like a lion on all fours go kneeling.
_Nor like a lion on all fours go kneeling._
If I keep faith, then bounteous cups be mine.
_If I keep faith, then bounteous cups be mine._
If not, to nauseous water change this wine.
_If not, to nauseous water change this wine._
Do you all swear to this?
We do, we do.
Then I shall immolate the victim thus.
Mrs Palmer never says “no”....
there is an island called lesbos, it is real and there to this day.
It was legendary as a waypoint for sailors/merchants/navy for their supply and r&r prostitution. The prostitutes were reputed to perfect their skills amongst each other between customers.
IOW a lesbian was a prostitute who was properly trained to please their male custormer.
Feminists seem to think they have the world’s only vaginas.
Perhaps the feminsts are threatening to END their strike and start having sex with men. If abortion continues then they promist to continue keep the uglyness to themselves.
It seems to be that way with all of these "progressive" ideas. They always lead to unintended consequences which require another progressive idea which leads to another problem, ad infinitum.
It would be like Masturbation but with someone to talk to!
Sorry, for being crude & rude.
If there is no sexual intercourse there would be no need for abortions.
Now that we’ve got that problem solved, what’s next?
Athenian soldier to Spartan Herald:
Hey why are you bent over like a man trying to light a match in the wind? What is that thing poking out of your cloak? My god, are you a man or Priapus?
Spartan Herald to Athenian: Fool! That is a Spartan message rod.
I can’t remember any more.
The Fems have a flaw in their campaign logic: It is the Women who have abortions, not the Men.
Women should thus be the targets of the Fems campaign.
Suggestion for Fems campaign poster image: A beautiful Woman sitting with crossed legs.
I guess their old mantra of “Make Love, not War” is passe’ now?
What they really meant was “Make Love, not Babies”.
Surely you are hiding a spear under your cloak!
If they don’t have sex there is no need for an abortion.
However, there is a need for that woman’s man to perhaps go ‘abroad’...
and there is plenty of invitations for a boat ride out there these days.
Ya gotta watch out for those 'Come hither' vaginas.
And would any men want them? Maybe if you’re blind or something....
There is something horrifying about the thought of mating with a woman would gladly turn her womb into an execution chamber for your unborn son or daughter.
No sex with feminists - not the strongest threat in the world.
I have to wonder about some of the older pro-choicers who had their kids before Roe v Wade. Do they regret having their children? Do they wish they could've legally aborted? Some of them are SO strident. I wonder what their kids think.
There are probably a lot of us Baby Boomers who wouldn't be here if abortion were legal way back when. Yet our parents sucked it up, acted like grown-ups, and made families, to the best of their abilities.
(Seems to me there’d be an OVERWHELMING # of men only too happy to bypass sex with feminists!)
My wick never dipped a baby killer after I grew up
Woman ain’t up to bearing her child
She ain’t worth shagging
Do a Google search on “Meiki Series,” spend under $100, and any need for “the real thing” - with all it’s hassles and inanities and property settlements, etc - will fade away like a bad nightmare.
the chance of a woman on the pill and a guy wearing a condom conceiving a child is somewhere near ZERO.....women who demand the "right " to abortion are too damned stupid to prevent pregnancy....period.
It seems to me that the men who oppose abortion are generally not those who would want to have sex with them...and those who would want to have sex with them are likely already on their side. So, by all means, strike.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.