Freedom to NOT associate with them is part of the freedom of association
I can understand Los Angeles banks turning down mortgages for talent in the area, since the condom law passed in LA last year is basically going to force all production to move elsewhere... placing mortgaged homes at a higher risk.
Maybe because they withdrew too many times.
I wonder if she was Dem or Rep? Also, I would imagine the porn industry to be rather pro-1st and 2nd Amend. and for small, less intrusive govt. So I wonder if there are more fiscally conservative porn stars, you know, other than all the illicit sex.
Go to WalMart and get a Blurebird account....they dont care if you are porno star.
Like....what....the checks or direct deposit say “for porn work”
I believe BOA and Chase are also refusing to do business with firearm related businesses.
Maybe the banks want to avoid trouble from female employees having to interact with people in the porn business, and claiming “hostile working environment”.
Maybe if she showed up at the bank wearing some clothes, she’d find better service. Enough is enough already.
While I would be happy to see bank managers involved in shunning such disgusting behavior, something about this story does not sit right. I have some questions but no answers.
Could it be that some mohammedans are raising a fuss?
Is this just a way to set a precedent so they can go after conservatives based on some sort of claim of moral objection?
Are the claims of the “victims” bogus and just a premise for inviting more Obamugabe regs?
Maybe the tellers don't like handling all those sticky $1 bills.
Seriously, the acting is atrocious, production is amateurish and it's always the same story line, but OTOH the porn industry never asked me for a bailout...
Does this include high profile hotel chains that offer pay-per-porn channels for lonely travellers to jerk off to?
Has she tried a sperm bank?
(*rimshot*)
What business of the bank’s is your line of employment to open an account? A loan, that’s different, but an account?