Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You gotta be crazy to think the founders intended this.
Gateway Pundit ^ | April 12, 2013 | Mara Zebest

Posted on 04/12/2013 8:22:32 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp

L.A. County Cites 16 ‘Maternity Hotels’ Serving Asian Visitors

LA Times reports the following:

Following a flurry of complaints, Los Angeles County inspectors have cited 16 “maternity hotel” owners for illegally operating boardinghouses in residential zones.

No major health or safety issues were found at the hotels, where women from Asia stay to give birth to U.S. citizen babies. But some of the facilities, which were in Rowland Heights or Hacienda Heights, were cited for building and fire code violations, according to a report released Thursday.


(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; aliens; amnesty; anchor; anchorbaby; babies; born; citizen; illegals; jackpotbabies; natural; naturalborncitizen; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-320 next last
To: buwaya

Top Ten Nations of Origin for Legal Permanent Residents in 2012
(Green Card Holders)

Mexico: 146,406
China: 81,784
India: 66,434
Philippines: 57,327
Dominican Republic: 41,566
Cuba: 32,820
Vietnam: 28,304
Haiti: 22,818
Columbia: 20,931
South Korea: 20,931

1,031,631 persons total were granted Permanent Resident Alien status in 2012.


41 posted on 04/12/2013 2:31:11 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Note that of these only @250K were from high performing Asian populations (I am guesstimating).
If the legal immigration system were managed with a performance benchmark (say an IQ test), what would the national breakdown be do you think ?


42 posted on 04/12/2013 2:34:43 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Look! This thread or discussion is NOT about ASIAN IMMIGRANTS!

It’s about birthing hotels and then they LEAVE!! WAKE UP!


43 posted on 04/12/2013 2:37:50 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Birthing hotels cater mainly to Asians.

These Asians patronize these because it opens an option to immigrate at some future time, which would otherwise be nearly entirely unavailable considering the immigration waiting lists for most Asian categories.

Its an end-run around the waiting lists.

I say its a GOOD end-run around the waiting lists, because the way the waiting lists are managed is stupid, from a national policy point of view.


44 posted on 04/12/2013 2:43:30 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Top Ten Nations of Origin for person Naturalized as new American Citizens in 2012.
Mexico: 102,181
Philippines: 44,958
India: 42,928
Dominican Republic: 33,351
China: 31,868
Cuba: 31,244
Columbia: 23,972
Vietnam: 23,490
Haiti: 19,114
El Salvador: 16,685

A total of 757,434 Legal Permanent Residents became naturalized Citizens of the United States in 2012.


45 posted on 04/12/2013 2:43:48 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Regardless of the nation of origin, Obama got 73% of the Asian vote in 2012, second only to his 93% of the black vote and up from 62% in 2008. That is my concern.
We are adding the equivalent of a city the size of Dallas, Texas in green cards every year and a city the size of Charlotte, North Carolina in new naturalizations.


46 posted on 04/12/2013 2:53:56 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

We are also screwing up massively by not picking up most of the Asian immigrants as Republican voters.
They are more socially and economically conservative than most white populations that do vote Republican.

Of these groups the Filipinos and Vietnamese are reliably Republican, the others not. There is NO difference in essential social attitudes between Filipinos, Vietnamese, Chinese or Indians.

The real problem is a total lack of outreach, plus incredibly poor messaging.


47 posted on 04/12/2013 3:03:41 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

They must have left my score out of the White Math Average. I’d have pulled it down a good hundred points singlehandedly. [Got a super hi IQ, yet doing math is like running a marathon—takes all my effort. Go figure.]


48 posted on 04/12/2013 3:17:22 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

When both parties start making appeals based on race then it is over. We will be fully tribal then. You espouse racism....


49 posted on 04/12/2013 3:28:43 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The Asian perception (in very many cases) is that the Republican party is a white club, that mainly speaks to and for white people.

There is a considerable diffidence and insecurity on the part of many Asians on this matter. There is a perception (not all that wrong) that they are held to be unwelcome in this country by Republicans.

There are very few Republicans speaking to Asians in Asian venues, and even fewer Asian Republicans doing so. And there are NO Republicans backing Asian issues, such as the shocking discrimination against Asians in college admissions.

Besides this a large proportion of Asians live in states that are dominated by Democrats, such as California. And nearly all live in big cities. The Asian view of politics is non-ideological. It is mainly a matter of power. There is no point backing Republicans if all that gets you is getting on the bad side of the people with power.

Complicating Asian outreach is that Filipinos are not Vietnamese are not Chinese are not Indians, etc. The various Asian groups don’t really talk to each other. They are not “Asian” in identity. They share locations and attitudes and interests but not identity.


50 posted on 04/12/2013 3:43:44 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ObligedFriend

Good find.


51 posted on 04/12/2013 4:41:21 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
The Europeans would (or should) kill for more Chinese immigrants. If they had Chinese instead of Arabs they would be immensely better off. Tell me that isn’t so.

That is so, but the issue isn't the QUALITY of the Immigrants, it's the fact that they are abusing our system.

I don't even fault them for doing it, Idiots have wrongly interpreted our laws to permit it. These people are just taking advantage of it.

52 posted on 04/12/2013 4:43:45 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
They are immigrants, or soon-to-be immigrants. We want their “entire clan”. These are GOOD clans.

They aren’t criminals. Their incarceration rate is a fraction of US white people. They contribute more in taxes than they absorb in benefits. They fill our Engineering and Science programs. They are a massive economic net plus.

There are dozens of visa programs that let in a trickle of the sort of people we want, compared to the total immigration flow. We don’t want a trickle, we want a flood, of the best.

That they are good immigrants is irrelevant to the point. I would have the same objection to Canadians pulling this stunt. (Probably more so even.)

53 posted on 04/12/2013 4:45:28 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

And these people followed our laws to get their green cards. They didn’t take advantage of the fact that latter day idiots interpreted the laws wrongly.


54 posted on 04/12/2013 4:47:36 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

What the matter with the people we elect that they would trade citizenship for almost nothing?


55 posted on 04/12/2013 8:18:02 PM PDT by GOPJ (New AP term for Illegal Aliens IS Undocumented Democrats.... Jay Leno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

More people would read this if you had the correct headline.


56 posted on 04/12/2013 8:18:53 PM PDT by GOPJ (New AP term for Illegal Aliens IS Undocumented Democrats.... Jay Leno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
 photo TheTimesThursdayOct031793pg4Issue2796colA_zps31edf7ee.png
57 posted on 04/13/2013 2:21:16 AM PDT by ObligedFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; DiogenesLamp
“It is an established maxim, that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth, however, derives its force sometimes from place, and sometimes from parentage; but, in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States.” Madison

Exactly.

I don't think the Founders would be too happy with birth tourism, but I also don't think they saw it coming. And I know they didn't put anything in the Constitution to prevent it.

I would be in favor of changing the Constitution to shut down this industry, but that's what it will take.
58 posted on 04/13/2013 9:24:56 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
More people would read this if you had the correct headline.

What ought the correct headline be?

59 posted on 04/13/2013 9:53:11 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ObligedFriend

Another good find. I see some potential leads in that article for further research.


60 posted on 04/13/2013 9:55:29 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-320 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson