Skip to comments.Iceland Dismantles Corrupt Gov’t—Arrests All Rothschild Bankers
Posted on 02/22/2013 9:37:06 AM PST by Mortrey
Not only have they been successful, at overthrowing the corrupt Govt, theyve drafted a Constitution, that will stop this from happening ever again. Thats not the best part
The best part, is that they have arrested ALL Rothschild/Rockefeller banking puppets, responsible for the Countrys economic Chaos and meltdown.
(Excerpt) Read more at therightplanet.com ...
You’re sooo behind the times. Soros is the evil puppet master now.
Count me out.
Yup, blame the jews like Hitler did when he was losing the war. One needs a time proven escape-goat!
Their proposed new constitution sounds like social justice doctrine in all it’s progressive glory.
Soros isn’t even in the same league as these guys.
Labels only help to confuse the issue. “Puppet masters” is a reaction. “Jewish bankers” is as well.
I prefer the Bible’s “wicked men” for a sound label that is never out of date. But how can a wicked people rightly define wicked men?
“But we worldly men have miserable, mad, mistaking eyes,”—Titus Andronicus
True and he couldn’t do what he is doing without their help.
The Daily Paul?
I’d rather read the DNC talking points of the day.
Yes, I’d vote for Hillary, who pushed for the go ahead to kill Bin Laden, before the fruitcake that is RonPaul.
The rest of the world should follow Iceland’s lead.
I just did a google search for this new event and I don’t see any news services picking this up...except StormFront and The DailyPaul.
Also, the dates appear to be June 2012.
You should maybe get out more...
There's a BIG world out there and there are those who want to run it. Always has been; always will be. So, just who do you think is behind the one world governance plans under the various auspices we read about every day, hmmm?
Do you ... uhh ... do you have any sort of Solution to this problem that you might want to suggest??
If the account in the article is true, and it appears it is, should you not be given a moment of pause and ask, "WHY aren't there any "news" articles about it?" FWIW, the DailyPaul article from June last year seems to be the original.
(1) When Europeans use the word "government" they mean "administration." The government of Iceland - like those of most free countries - changed administrations. The old coalition lost the election and a new coalition won. They did not "dismantle" their government.
(2) No new Constitution was drafted. The Icelandic Constitution of 1944 is still in place and there are no plans to replace it.
(3) While the Tchenguiz brothers (who have no relationship with either the Rothschild or Rockefeller families) were indeed arrested, they were later released when the government admitted that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing on their part.
No one associated with the Rockefeller or Rothschild families were arrested in Iceland.
(4) The author apparently believes that it is possible to draft a law that will prevent any future financial crisis. This is, of course, impossible
The author is not only a rabid anti-Semite, but is also an imbecile even by the rather low standards of anti-Semites.
In other words, a typical Ron Paul fan.
Actually, it appears completely false.
This makes sense, since it actually is completely false.
It was also offensive and stupid.
The people who create “money” out of thin air, lend it out, then collect interest on it, are the fraudsters. Who are they?
I think he's also a Lost Causer, as such types often are.
We can agree to disagree, but the jew haters by default blame an easy target. Its even koranic.
I don't see where one's ancestry has anything to do with it...And Rothschild and Rockefeller are Jewish names???
Sounds like Iceland got their own 'Tea Party'...
Oh, good Lord. You are one trouble fella.
The are the only sane people in this world. Our country is run by the worst crooks in our history. You have no idea what is happening to us. What keeps you in such a little protected world? It is not Jewish Bankers. There is so much more to this issue. The is game bigger and the puppet master is not a Jew.
Their religion isn't important - that's just a strawman people throw out in order to dissuade any critical inquiry into the global bankster agenda (21).
The Rothschilds may be Jewish but the Rockefellers aren't, and again it has nothing to do with their faith, especially since the Saudis are in on the action, too.
So to answer your question, the answer is no, we're not back to that again. The bankster agenda isn't even a conspiracy. They are quite open and brazen about it now.
If the headline writer wanted to say that "bankers" were arrested, I would understand why that might happen -- a lot of bankers are doing a lot of bad stuff.
Although I am not Jewish, I have been around long enough to know that some people use code words:
Jewish Bankers -- that's clear
International Bankers -- that means Jewish bankers
Rothschild Bankers -- that means Jewish bankers
Foreign Bankers -- that means Jewish Bankers.
The body of the report talks about Rockefeller Bankers -- I'm fine with that, I may be cynical, but even I cannot claim that this is a crypto reference to Jewish banking: Rockefellers are not Jewish. But the headline says Rothschild Bankers. I think that sets off bells for a lot of people. They wink. They nod. They know what is being talked about.
I get real nervous when there are hints of any sort of world-wide Jewish Conspiracy. I've seen that movie before.
Now, a world-wide banking conspiracy ... I can accept that concept. I just think throwing in "Rothschild" as a modifier is unecessary and unwise.
FWIW, I believe our Founders had it right when they forbade a central bank in the US. Even so, there were several attempts to create a central bank in the US but the only one that has stuck is the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. It saved the US in particular and the rest of the world from interminable financial roller coasters, right? Who created it? Oddly enough, competitors, after a fashion. Interlocking financial(banking) directorates in addition to major corporate interlocking directorates might belie that notion, though.
In answer to your first question, would you suggest the Rothschild family and its tentacles did not and do not exist? The international bankers are a cozy bunch to be sure but are they all Jews? Probably not.
Seems I’m being ridiculed for posting this article.
Unfortunately, when I posted it, it could only be found at the site posted.
Since then, this appeared—perhaps you’d enjoy this site better:
I posted this story because I thought it was inspiring that the people of Iceland actually DID something about the corruption in their government; I did NOT post it to attack all Jews. It’s unfortunate that that is all you could glean from it.
You're suggesting there is not a word of truth in the article? A complete fabrication a la Jason Blair et al??? Or are you suggesting there just parts of it that aren't true?
Refute anything I said. Prove anything I referred to was inaccurate.
Your NeoYankee vitriol towards Southerners is well known but I’d like to see you refute any fact I stated.
Zionist Conspirator is not known to me as a South hater
perhaps you could ping genuine South haters...plenty here...since you need help apparently...type in Lincoln in search...you can find plenty help
I am in favor of preserving a traditional socially conservative America.
Do you too see America as one long history of oppression against minorities of any stripe and therefore something to be dismantled and replaced with a new humanist anything goes culture overseen by socialism?
If so then maybe you are on the wrong forum drowning in your politically correctness as is your wont.
If believing our very existence is in danger and threatened by many including those aforementioned makes me a Lost Causer then so be it.
btw...what brings your sorry ass back now anyhow?
why aren’t you off anti freeping as is your custom ...talking tough putting down the forum as racist and bigoted while you hang with your homeys at anti freeper sites?
What is holding up America today is the white Christian vote...plain and simple.
We peel off a few minorities here and there but not enough to matter.
Turning white liberals is the real key to power but a tall order....but the largest voting effect for the effort.
Turn progressive Jews and it would help beyond just votes but not likely to happen.
I am not going to refuse to criticize how the majority of Jews vote or act ..or any other minority does either just because they are “protected”..that is so silly and a large reason our nation is so lost right now
You sure don’t hold back when you blow it out yer ass about Southerners now do you?
I am far more polite and even handed about progressive Jews than you are about Southerners when your petty dander is up.
As usual...a Northeastern socially liberal GOPe type blissfully unaware of your own bigotry as you rail about others
so typical of Yankees God love em
I appreciate your good manners.
Oh great, just what we need, politicians blaming all their problems on the bankers with certain names. I’m surprised they haven’t re-released ‘The Protocols’ yet and close the loop.
I am not suggesting it, I am asserting it.
Not one sentence in the linked article is factually accurate.
Some of the posters who replied need to take the test.
It isn’t widely known that Soros was given start up funding by the Rothchilds. It is lesser known that the Rothchilds money helped put communism in power in Russia. The Rothchild family and banking interests have over centuries caused international upheavals. The people of Iceland got it right.
Feel free to document your claims about "anti freeper" sites, BTW.
No they didn't. The corrupt government scape goated bankers for playing in the system the corrupt government created, then acted like they were the heroes. Bankers are always an easy target in the 'us versus them' mentality. Has happened before, will happen again.
It isn't "known" because you can't "know" something that isn't true.
It is lesser known that the Rothchilds money helped put communism in power in Russia.
The same goes for this nonsense as well.
The Rothchild family and banking interests have over centuries caused international upheavals.
Please name just one, O grand maker of sweeping historical claims.
The people of Iceland got it right.
The Icelandic public did not actually do what this article is fraudulently claiming.
A ridiculous assertion that doesn't deserve a response. Sad really. Bye.
Ironically, not only were Rothschild’s not involved here, but the only regime that was booted was the Icelandic Center Right regime.
Further the Socialists and Greens were put into power...lol.
Let’s just say that StormFront and DailyPaul once again show their fruits.
Just an observation before I stretch out on the couch: You are either one of the self appointed(?) defenders of the realm or you don’t get out much. I choose door number one.
I think he's also a Lost Causer, as such types often are.
Thank you for your vigilance, wideawake. Unfortunately the comment had already been deleted by the time I clicked on the thread. I'll take your word for it, though.
The Old South and the Confederacy weren't anti-Semitic, and my anti-Confederatism comes from my political philosophy and heritage as the descendant of Southern Unionists rather than from my religious beliefs. One could certainly be a Noachide and take the side of the Confederacy.
The anti-Semitism one sees so often in neo-Confederate circles doesn't come from their Confederate ancestors, but from the Midwestern Germanophile isolationists who have been running "palaeconservatism" since before WWII. Any time you see "Confederates" bemoaning our participation in WWII (which real Southerners supported even before we were formally involved) or attacking Israel (and bemoaning the fact that real Southerners support Israel) or advocating protectionism (which the real Confederates opposed and which Hamiltonians like myself support), you know you're seeing a palaeocon, "neo-Confederate" poser.
You know what's even more miraculous than "Jewish bankers creating money out of nothing?" Anti-Semites creating "Jewish bankers" and "Rothschilds" out of thin air where there are none!!!
The Founders themselves (at least some of them, ie, Hamilton and Washington) created a central bank just a few years after the adoption of the Constitution. George Washington signed the Bank of the United States into law on Feb. 25, 1791, and it lasted twenty years. Then in 1816 a second central bank was chartered and it also lasted twenty years. There was even a "central bank" under the Articles of Confederation (the Bank of North America). Only a brainwashed John Bircher (which I used to be as well) jumps directly from 1787 to the Federal Reserve in 1913 and pretends there were no other central banks in our history.
The central bank was supported by the Federalists and Whigs, who were the conservatives of the day. It was opposed by the forerunner of today's Democrat party (the Jeffersonians and later, the Jacksonians) who were subversive and supported the French Revolution.
If George Washington thought a central bank was Constitutional, I'm not going to argue with him. The Communist Manifesto doesn't call for the creation of a central private bank, but a central state bank. Ironically, these anti-Semites often call for the complete nationalization of the financial sector (in order to "fight Communism!"). In other words, by calling for the nationalization of banks, it is the anti-Semites, and not the Hamiltonians, who are echoing the Communist Manifesto.
It's too bad the JBS and its satellites (which used to praise the Federalists) changed sides some thirty years ago and jumped 100% into the subversive Jeffersonian column.
I used to be in the Birch Society. Maybe in time you'll wake up as well and see how you're being manipulated.
Not to mention that the Rothschilds have been Christians for several generations at least.
The South was not "conservative." The conservative sector of American politics in the Early Federal Period were the Hamiltonian Federalists, and after them, the Whigs. The Jeffersonian/Jacksonian faction was subversive, socialist, pro-Jacobin, and probably penetrated. I would also like to point out that it was the Northern, Hamiltonian tradition that opposed Free Masonry--not the "conservative" ante-bellum South. If you believe in the Illuminati conspiracy theory, then you must acknowledge that it was old theocratic Puritan New England that represented the apex of early American conservatism.
I am not a "civilizationist" like "palaeconservatives" are; I am a a religious fundamentalist. I don't give a hang for anybody's "civilization." I am for a world governed by the Laws of the One True G-d. I do not believe in a "planet of peoples," in which each people subscribes to its own ("equally valid") religion and worldview. Only an atheist or agnostic like the late, unlamented Dr. Sam Francis could hold such a position. I make no distinction among non-Theistically-based moral/ethical systems. They are all wrong, whether they are responsible for the murder of hundreds of millions of people, or whether they harmless and haven't hurt a fly. Conservatism and Tradition are valid only in so far as they submit to and are in harmony with the Laws of the One True G-d. Otherwise "conservatism" and "tradition" are nothing but paganism, idolatry, and henotheism. I am adamantly opposed to secular, utilitarian conservatism of even the most "palaeo" variety. The whole point of our existence is to obey the True G-d. If your locus is on some other matter, then we do not share the same philosophy, however many positions we may coincidentally share in common.
In other words, I am Eric Hoffer's True Believer--much more so than any agnostic, utilitarian, racialist/civilizationist/henotheistic "palaeocon" could ever be.
Wideawake is from New Jersey (which until Wilson was one of the most conservative states in the Union), but he is not a liberal. He is a true Hamiltonian/Federalist/Whig conservative, in the best since of the term. He is also a Biblical inerrantist and has stood up to defend Southerners whenever their religious beliefs were under attack from evolutionists and higher critics--even when these came from his own religious tradition. He is certainly anti-Confederate, but he does not "hate the South." I hope you don't classify everyone who takes the side of the Union as a "South hater." At the very least, aren't the descendants of the Grand Army of the Republic as entitled to pride in their ancestors as the members of the SCV? The Union/Confederate divide represents the Hamiltonian/Jeffersonian divide that existed even among those who created our Constitution.
I love the South. I love the Republican party (from the moment of its birth). I reject the Confederacy and the subversive Jeffersonian ideology on which it was based.
I hope this clears things up.
Purim is this weekend (specifically, strday night and sunday day). Beware! Hide under your beds lest you be destroyed just as were Haman and his sons!
Anyone spreading propaganda about a "Jewish conspiracy" will meet the following fate: Jews will snap their fingers and "create money out of nothing" in your windpipes, causing you to smother! You will suffocate on money! Mwa-ha-ha!!! I mean, cause that's what you do when you can "create money out of nothing!"
Or maybe they will fluoridate your drinking water, or confiscate your apricot pits, or create money "out of nothing" in your liver!
Quiver in fear of the Learned Elders of Zion! [/sarcasm]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.