Unfortunately, statistically, he is correct on this point. Interesting, to say the least.
White, male, anarchist, college students still living with mommy and daddy would be a better target group. Just trying to help.
If we are to adopt a policy of racial profiling of Mulims on airplanes or young Black males driving through white neighborhoods, we will have to profile young white males walking into a school, shopping mall or movie theater.
Just curious. Exactly how does one go about profiling a majority of the population? Doesn’t that sort of defeat the purpose of profiling?
Yeah, that always works. The DC snipers were profiled as a singular white male. Turned out to be two black muslims.
The guy has a point. When was the last time a crazy black or Hispanic shot up a place - the best they can do is be sniper-like, taking days between kills (i.e., Malvo and Atlanta). Lots of black people and lots of really bad black people have guns - but they STILL don’t run into their local schools and start shooting up the place.
Actually, I partially agree, although I would take the age down to maybe 12 or something, and then have an upper limit of maybe 35. Also, I’d only be profiling the ones on drugs or confirmed nerds (i.e., half of them). Those skinny young whites worry me as much as some black thug.
Scratch a Lefty, get an eugenicist. Start warming up the ovens.
He has a point.
Young white males age 13-30 are statistically the most likely to go off the deep end and kill a bunch of people.
Auto insurance companies profile young male drivers and charge higher premiums. There is statistical validity in doing so.
I know if I see a dorky looking young white male in a coat or bulky shirt in a public place I give him wide berth
He has a point.
Young white males age 13-30 are statistically the most likely to go off the deep end and kill a bunch of people.
Auto insurance companies profile young male drivers and charge higher premiums. There is statistical validity in doing so.
I know if I see a dorky looking young white male in a coat or bulky shirt in a public place I give him wide berth
The first school shooting I remember happened less than a mile from my home at a mostly white school (then). A black man walked into a portable classroom and held a gun to the head of his girlfriend. I am pretty sure that the guy allowed the teacher to usher the other students out of the room. The guy then killed his girlfriend and himself. That teacher passed away this past year. My brother was a student at the school when this happened, and I was in junior high. I don’t remember if they replaced that portable or not, and if they didn’t, then I had American History in that room two years later. The next school shooting at that school occurred a year after I graduated. Some gang member decided to shoot someone in the parking lot. The demographics of that area went from white to black rapidly after that. These things occurred during the Reagan presidency.
I thought that profiling - e.g., in the absence of a specific crime to which a suspect with a specific ethnic make-up had been linked: law enforcement officials stopping, questioning, and perhaps searching the vehicles of Black motorists, simply on the basis of their race, in the belief/hope that they would be more likely to find any sort of incriminating evidence, i.e. "fishing" - had been deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Can someone help me out here? Just what sort of profiling does this idiot here claim is routinely allowed in the United States?
Is he talking about, e.g., subjecting bearded, Koran-toting airline passengers to stricter frisking, while permitting Scandinavian nuns to pass unaccosted? Because that, apparently, isn't the policy of TSA.
Regards,
The worst school shooter in US history at that Tech college was Korean.
>> “That’s the one profile in America that’s not allowed to be profiled.”
What a pant load of crap. What about the “balding, middle-aged, white guy” profile?
Young males without a father are very much at risk of perpetrating horrific acts. They are also likely to be lazy amoral assholes.
Families need fathers!!!
Youths playing those hideous video games where you score points for shooting people or running them over with a car certainly aren’t helping matters!
I love the quality of the graphics on the latest games.... but there is no effing way I will ever play a game centered around killing and maiming with guns or whatever other weapons... I find them sickening.
As for gun control... a lot more normal God fearing folk need to be carrying guns! There should be very few places where citizens can’t carry weapons. NO MORE GUN FREE KILLING ZONES!
Lets do it. But if you open that door, you retarded lefty, you open all profiling doors. Deal?
so publically, there is no reason to be suspicious of inner city black yutes who roam around together in packs and wear their pants down past their yo-yo's....
we could also profile most people that stop pyschos with guns as white males too.
We can start profiling on these twits......