How does praising Jim Robinson make any insight intellectual observation by others less important. Please, I would love to hear your answer, as if you could ever conjure up one that makes even the slightest sense.
I an not the only one, see other comments on this thread.
The fact is, try to remain focused on my points. It was Jim Robinson who made a distinct request to please not to consider Romney as nominee, As founder of FR I've congratulated him for the accuracy if his decision
I, as many others on this site had no say so what so ever as to who the nominee would be. I detested and still detest Romney. I don't need any one to tell me what is or isn't the right choice as apparently you do.
What you evidently lack is the under standing that there are great minds her that don't need his imprimatur either, your thesis is an affront to those people.
How does praising Jim Robinson make any insight intellectual observation by others less important.
See above.
If you cannot step back and realize in reality what just happened in this election then there is no need for further conversation.
Your insinuation that Jim is the sole arbiter of Conservative opinion is at least an insult to independent thought and suggest lemming type mentality of the left.
Sorry if you don't see it or disagree.
I respect Jim's opinions and mostly agree with his approach to political matters, how ever he is not my "guiding light"