Posted on 11/08/2012 3:46:58 PM PST by Orange1998
Think about it. This election was purely about domestic issues, never heard anyone say voting for Romney because he has bad @ss foreign policy. Sadly, Romney did not win his own state with Obama taking 61% of MA votes.
1. Republican Nominates the riches person ever to run for President who couldn't connect with middle and lower class.
2. A flip flopper no one really sure his position. He was a serial candidate who changed as often as the wind blew. Even Goofus Rick Perry had him talking in circles.
3. Would never give details about his grand plan only to refer you to his website for information.
4. Would cut federal spending only to reveal the cuts after elected. Another way of saying I am not going to lie to you but once elected I will hammer you and your grandmother, no thanks I'll pass.
5. With a serious face propose Eliminating Big Bird after being pressured on the proposed cuts. Something two drunks sitting around fireplace would say only to wake up the next morning laughing at the thought. Only stupid candidates go after children programs during elections.
I could go on and on but you get the point, Republicans nominated the worst candidate available. Even Ron Paul could have won this election. Surely is not about Republicans having the wrong platform its about Republicans nominated the weakest candidate. The only good out of this, Romney will never run again and 2016 is a sure Republican bet since voters will experience miserable eight years of failed Obama policy.
According to the Pravda media, Ron Paul would have fallen into the Old, White Man category and therefore would have lost.
My cousin has a bad @ss. He has an appointment to see his proctologist in the morning.
The formerly white South Africa tested nuclear weapons for the Israelis. Look it up. BTW, Israel has thermonuclear (”H-Bomb”) weapons in addition to nuclear (”A-Bomb”) which is what Iran is equipped with.
I voted for Romney. In Massachusetts. In a town neighboring Romney's old hometown Belmont. Belmont went for Zero 9108 to 4728, not counting 131 for Jill Stein and 110 for Gary Johnson. My town went for Zero 7000 to 5602, with Stein and Johnson getting 63 and 102.
Ron Paul may be a bit short of a byte on foreign policy, but, on balance, the good doctor is the sanest of them all!
I’m just pissed that I fell for the old “wow. Look at the crowds” BS. There were bigger crowds for Palin and look where that got us. In some ways, I think those crowds kept some people home thinking “why vote. It’s in the bag?”
I’ll tell you why Romney lost -
AGREE WITH OBAMA ON:
1. NDAA
2. Bailouts
3. War on Drugs
4. Police State
5. ObamaCare / ROMNEYCARE
Has Romney even adopted a fraction of the pro-freedom agenda or “Leave me the F alone” platform - a ton a Ron Paul voters would have voted for him.
The concept of liberty and freedom is abstract compared to ObamaPhones and condoms with voters.
They soon will learn. Will it matter? Despite the destruction liberalism and big government has wrought on Indian reservations and inner cities, they still think voting for more of the same will fix it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.