Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VANITY..Romney was so weak Ron Paul could have won the Presidency.

Posted on 11/08/2012 3:46:58 PM PST by Orange1998

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Orange1998

According to the Pravda media, Ron Paul would have fallen into the Old, White Man category and therefore would have lost.


61 posted on 11/08/2012 8:08:16 PM PST by BlessingsofLiberty (Remember Brian Terry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
...never heard anyone say voting for Romney because he has bad @ss foreign policy.

My cousin has a bad @ss. He has an appointment to see his proctologist in the morning.

62 posted on 11/08/2012 8:17:19 PM PST by Isabel C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

63 posted on 11/08/2012 8:56:22 PM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

The formerly white South Africa tested nuclear weapons for the Israelis. Look it up. BTW, Israel has thermonuclear (”H-Bomb”) weapons in addition to nuclear (”A-Bomb”) which is what Iran is equipped with.


64 posted on 11/08/2012 10:39:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: madison10
I WOULD have stayed home if Ron Paul had been the candidate. The guy is a looney tune.

I voted for Romney. In Massachusetts. In a town neighboring Romney's old hometown Belmont. Belmont went for Zero 9108 to 4728, not counting 131 for Jill Stein and 110 for Gary Johnson. My town went for Zero 7000 to 5602, with Stein and Johnson getting 63 and 102.

Ron Paul may be a bit short of a byte on foreign policy, but, on balance, the good doctor is the sanest of them all!

65 posted on 11/08/2012 11:09:38 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

I’m just pissed that I fell for the old “wow. Look at the crowds” BS. There were bigger crowds for Palin and look where that got us. In some ways, I think those crowds kept some people home thinking “why vote. It’s in the bag?”


66 posted on 11/09/2012 5:59:37 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

I’ll tell you why Romney lost -

AGREE WITH OBAMA ON:

1. NDAA
2. Bailouts
3. War on Drugs
4. Police State
5. ObamaCare / ROMNEYCARE

Has Romney even adopted a fraction of the pro-freedom agenda or “Leave me the F alone” platform - a ton a Ron Paul voters would have voted for him.


67 posted on 11/09/2012 6:07:42 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Good post.

The concept of liberty and freedom is abstract compared to ObamaPhones and condoms with voters.

They soon will learn. Will it matter? Despite the destruction liberalism and big government has wrought on Indian reservations and inner cities, they still think voting for more of the same will fix it

68 posted on 11/09/2012 6:11:14 AM PST by LMAO ("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson