Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: muwarriors92
Because Rass was the most accurate in 2008. Yes, he was off but less off then every other pollster.

But I know don't bother the Freeper Eeyore choir with inconvenient facts

21 posted on 11/04/2012 9:36:09 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

Rasmussen was off nationally by only 0.5% in 2008. That’s pretty good.


24 posted on 11/04/2012 10:01:38 AM PST by Askwhy5times (http://bluegrasspundit.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Rass was the most accurate in 2008. Gallup didn’t do very well.

Rass did very poorly in 2010.

That’s my concern.

We’re here saying Gallup is the cat’s meow, yet they got a “C” in 2008. Rass got a “C” in 2010 but an “A” in 2008. PPP and Quinipiac both got B+’s in 2010 but did poorly in 2008.

I don’t think anyone knows what is going to happen. Rasmussen has this election tied right now...I’m hoping Gallup is the one that is correct because basically they are saying the enthusiasm gap is going to win the day for Mitt.


30 posted on 11/04/2012 11:17:48 AM PST by muwarriors92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Maybe he pulls this out, but right now Rass and others are looking like they were wrong. And yet I’m the “freeper Eeyore” for simply calling it out and not drinking the Romney landslide stuff? Uhm, ok.


31 posted on 11/06/2012 6:56:05 PM PST by muwarriors92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson