Posted on 02/24/2012 4:21:07 AM PST by Recon Dad
Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing used in 30-year-old, waterflooded oil fields has boosted production per well from 25 to 300 barrels per day.
The new frontier for the unconventional gas technology is in old oil fields. This is a huge opportunity for using long laterals, multiple-stage fracs and smaller, high-tech fractures, said George King, global technology consultant, at the NAPE Business Conference on Feb. 22 in Houston.
“Right now, we have two big oil plays -- the Bakken and Eagle Ford. What if you take the name shale off of it? There are three or four more big plays coming on if you look at how many types of oil sandstones that could benefit from horizontal wells, multiple-stage fracturing and other technologies,” he explained.
“It is not just shales any more. I’ve been involved in drilling horizontal wells into water-flooded reservoirs that are 30 years old and never produced more than 20 to 25 barrels per day (b/d) per vertical well. The first couple of wells were drilled between the pattern. They were drilling along the fracture direction. There were five little longitudinal fracs along the well bore. They brought on a couple of wells that were over 300 b/d.
“If you’ve got some old reservoirs like that, start looking at them,” King emphasized.
Today’s huge increase in unconventional oil and gas production is a result of applying technology and figuring out how to use it.
“I’ve been told many times that the Barnett shale was a 17-year overnight success,” he laughed. “Take a look at recovery of original gas in place. It runs from 1% in the 1980s when that was all we thought we could get out of shale with the technologies at hand. In 2008, it was above 30% for the first time and above 45% in 2011.”
The same thing is beginning to happen in oil shales. “We are seeing recoveries of original oil in place starting to move. Recoveries have been at 1% and are now closing in on 5% to 8%. Do you see the pattern that is emerging here?” he asked.
“We saw it with natural gas. It took us 25 or 30 years to get to this point. We can do it faster with oil now that we have learned how to use many different technologies and adopt these technologies. We don’t know that much about oil shales. But, this is going to get better.
“The technologies we have applied haven’t been new,” he emphasized. “But, these technologies have been adopted and sharpened for specific shales, and that is the difference.”
On natural gas development, one example of how far the technology has been refined is in the expected ultimate recovery (EUR). “A good Barnett well might recover 2.0 billion cubic feet (Bcf) EUR. In some places like the Horn River Basin where Apache is operating, try 10 to 15 Bcf EUR. That is a result of applying technology and figuring out how to use it,” King explained.
Technology involves many things, including equipment, fit-for-purpose technology and application experience, and therefore people.
In the Horn River Basin, Apache applied fit-for-purpose technology in designing its well pads. The first pad the company used has 16 or 18 wells and 274 fracs, King said.
“We reshaped the next pad for the next year for 12 wells. We increased the stages and lengths. We came out ahead on drilling time, were under budget, were right at or ahead of schedule, and had a lot better production.
The company’s 34-L pad covers six acres and drains 6,000 acres. It can be reclaimed down to 1/3 acre. The wellheads are only 10 ft apart. The equipment was fit-for-purpose to allow fracturing of all the wells on a single pad, he noted.
Apache also moved away from fresh water for fracing the wells. Instead, the company tapped into a saltwater zone just above the shale. “We didn’t use saltwater before because the chemicals didn’t work. Now we have chemicals that work with saltwater,” he pointed out.
The saltwater is treated before going to the frac tanks. The fluid is pumped down the hole during fracturing. It is recovered back to the surface and treated before being pumped back into the saltwater zone. It is a closed-loop system that doesn’t use fresh water, King stated.
“It is not so much a factor of whether technology will or will not work, it is a question of timing,” he explained. “As technology is developed, many of these shales that are uneconomic now will become economic as we move along. The issue is about focusing on what technology to use and when to use it.”
No matter what they do, we’re scraping the bottom.
$5 this year, $6 next, $10 in a few.
And many now “middle class” will not have the money, period.
Nuclear fusion or bust.
Finding enough natural gas to last 100 years is scraping the bottom? I don’t think so. As for fusion, it’s still 20 years in the future just as it was 40 years ago when I was a boy.
Yes because of our dear leader...
Have you ever talked to FRer's in the Oil and Gas Industry here? I have. Like the guy who's mentor originally mapped ANWR and said the mentor thinks if we go back and 3D map it it maybe 5 times the original estimate and is probably why NO ONE on both sides of the isle don't want to go back and map it, ( Yes Boehner is a woose) they all are afraid of the Watermellons/Sierra Club.
And Bakken? Who was I listening to yesterday, Rush or was it Levin noted it is 25 TIMES the original estimate.
I'd tell ya about the friend of a friend who is an Engineer at Bakken, but that is really not suited for everyone's eyes...
The point is we probably have enough oil, gas, and coal to last us hundreds of years. ( Even an eco-weenie I know in the power industry admitted if the chemical side of fracking is fixed we have 300 yrs of gas).
The problem is we need a flat tax to tell K-Street to enter a Job retraining program, and get the greenies out of the way via that move, and shut down the EPA so we can live and stay warm.
Thanks Recon Dad.
You completely ignore the energy required to extract those “recoverable” resources. Oil used to provide 100 barrels for one barrel of energy consumed in extraction. Tar sands and shale take that to 3:1 to start at best after fracing, heating, forcing it up, roasting in the case of shale, and refining thick gunky low quality crude. When you get down to that, you have to devote 1/3 of your entire industrial capacity to extraction to keep the other 2/3 going. When you get lower than 2:1, you can atill extract it, but the effort requires more than half of your economy. You can theoretically keep extracting until your energy input to output is 1:1 but the result will supply almost no one.
But an industrial economy implodes long before that. In fact, ours is close to imploding now.
It is better to import it from a cheap producer who can at least buy your stuff with the proceeds rather than sinking it in the ground in extraction costs.
Ask anyone with responsibility besides oil company share price self-promotion.
The 3:1 ratio is a worst-case; best case as it sits now is 10:1. The fact you ignore is that shale is entirely in the US, which means jobs here. Sending $2.50 a gallon (42 gal/bbl at $105/bbl) to OPEC — made up of nations which have terrorism as 99% of their export economy — saddles what’s left of our industrial economy with 10s if not 100s of millions of extra parasites.
Even if true, you still have to put at least 10 times as much into the ground as the Saudis do. And they buy our planes and invest. Ours is a reserve when you can’t get theirs anymore.
I’ve always thought that we should have taken them over the minute they nationalized our oil companies in the 50s, 60s and 70s. But we kept getting guilt tripped for Iran 1953.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.