Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Jersey Challenges Rule Allowing 60 Year Storage of Spent Fuel Rods at Power Plants
Environmental Resource Center ^ | 3/21/11

Posted on 03/22/2011 12:25:43 PM PDT by EBH

The State of New Jersey is seeking permission from a federal appeals court to join a legal action with New York, Vermont, and Connecticut that challenges a federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission rule that extends the time allowed for storing spent nuclear fuel at nuclear power plants from 30 years to a new standard of 60 years past the licensed life of a reactor, DEP Commissioner Bob Martin has announced.

The challenge, filed with the U.S. Appellate Court for the District of Columbia Circuit, contends the NRC acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in developing the new 60-year rule, and failed to perform an environmental impact statement as required by the National Environmental Policy Act.

“We are joining in this challenge because of the potential of significant public health and safety implications, and the potential impact on New Jersey’s environment,’’ said Commissioner Martin. “The failure of the NRC to conduct an adequate environmental impact statement is troubling. The federal government has an obligation to develop a permanent plan for nuclear waste storage, and cannot avoid an answer by extending the time that radioactive waste is allowed to remain on sites in New Jersey and across the nation. That is not acceptable.’’

New Jersey has four operating nuclear reactors that are affected by NRC rules: Oyster Creek in Lacey Township, Hope Creek in Lower Alloways Creek, and two units at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, also in Lower Alloways Creek. The NRC’s 60-year rule would apply to radioactive waste stored at each of those plants after they close.

The DEP and the Exelon Corp., which owns and operates Oyster Creek, entered into an Administrative Consent Order agreement in December that calls for Oyster Creek to cease operations by the end of 2019, which is 10 years earlier than its NRC license permits operation. That agreement allows Exelon to store its spent nuclear fuel on site until the federal Department of Energy (DOE) accepts it for permanent storage at a geological repository.

The NRC, however, has provided no assurances that such a storage facility will be available. The federal government last year announced it was ending consideration of creating a spent nuclear fuel depository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

The NRC in 1990 initiated its Waste Confidence Rule, finding that spent fuel from nuclear power plants could be stored safely and without significant environmental impacts for at least 30 years beyond the licensed life of a nuclear power plant. The NRC has subsequently issued an expanded 60-year rule.

In February, New York, Vermont, and Connecticut filed a petition for review of the NRC rule. The Natural Resources Defense Council, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Riverkeeper, and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, sought to join that action.


TOPICS: Science; Society
KEYWORDS:
The NRC, however, has provided no assurances that such a storage facility will be available. The federal government last year announced it was ending consideration of creating a spent nuclear fuel depository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

Yep...just where would you like them to store them you environuts!

We can't store them and you won't let us reprocess them...so...instead of legal BS...

What is your solution besides NIMBY

1 posted on 03/22/2011 12:25:46 PM PDT by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EBH

We can store them at Greenpeace HQ!


2 posted on 03/22/2011 12:27:56 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Harry Reid is solely responsible for Yucca Mt. not coming on line..guess he doesn’t wanna create jobs..


3 posted on 03/22/2011 12:30:23 PM PDT by ken5050 (Admin Moderators rule!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH; ken5050

You are both spot on!


4 posted on 03/22/2011 12:34:42 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

This is insane. I am all for doing away with nuclear, coal, gas, natural gas, thermal, wind, geothermal, water and any other type you can think of. Let’s keep it dark, cold or hot depending on the season. Now that’s the way to go......./sar


5 posted on 03/22/2011 12:41:26 PM PDT by animal172 (Does anyone even remember the USA of old?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
I know very little about Nukes except that they make a beautiful mushroom cloud but if the spent rods are dangerous, it must mean there is still energy in them. Why can't that be harnessed in some way for good???
6 posted on 03/22/2011 12:50:08 PM PDT by fish hawk (R. Emmett Tyrrell: Liberalism is dead. What we see now is "soft Nazis-ism".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Tell it to Harry Reid.


7 posted on 03/22/2011 12:51:20 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

it’s too bad that Jimmy Carter’s Executive Order prohibiting reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel is in place. We could have recycled the stuff into usable items for other industries instead of leaving it to sit around and be a danger to everyone.


8 posted on 03/22/2011 1:02:34 PM PDT by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Come up with a way that doesn’t scare the neighbors and you just might make a trillion dollars!


9 posted on 03/22/2011 3:21:54 PM PDT by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory

That is just it. We can talk about nuke plants all we want, but there is just one tiny matter still at issue.

What to do with the spent rods?


10 posted on 03/22/2011 3:24:01 PM PDT by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson