Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Big Bang Never Happened
YouTube ^ | 6/9/09 | Randall Meyers

Posted on 03/07/2011 1:44:47 PM PST by wendy1946

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
Every time one of my idiot friends(they are not all idiots, just a few)talks about the big bang and says all matter condensed into a spot the size of a dime and then exploded, I always ask them "Where did the matter come from?", all that dust that exploded after squeezing down to a dime sized spot, where did it originate from? What caused it to exist? They never have an answer but still insist that the big bang happened.

The big bang theory and the other theory about life coming from outer space and dropping onto earth, are merely attempts to dodge around the questions of how matter was formed originally and how life started from inert matter.

41 posted on 03/07/2011 3:24:22 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best
The Big Bang is short hand for Big Expansion of Space and it is not an explosion but a huge increase in the dimensions of space, and by the way, time.


42 posted on 03/07/2011 3:24:29 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

BUMP!


43 posted on 03/07/2011 3:24:59 PM PST by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis; wendy1946

Deo, I have greatly admired Wendy1946’s posts and comments here, and I asked her to ping me to things of interest to her. Obviously, she was asked to compile the list by more FReepers than just me, LOL!

This is a low-volume ping list, but worth the wait for what you get, IMO.


44 posted on 03/07/2011 3:25:06 PM PST by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

There are a number of fairly new Steady State theories that have been developed recently, say the last 15 years.

But most Astro-physicists see the Big Expansion as the most likely.


45 posted on 03/07/2011 3:26:08 PM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best
The smaller of the pairs of objects are frequently high mass, high velocity objects seen through the tail of a galaxy. The objects have a different matter distribution than the galaxy and have been id’d as distant objects.

That idea has basically been debunked, just too many such coincidences. In other words, beyond some point, connections stop being coincidental.

46 posted on 03/07/2011 3:27:11 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Republican Extremist

Pre-production models. Test mules if you will. Any designer worth His salt will go through several iterations until He finds one that is ready for full on production.

;-)


47 posted on 03/07/2011 3:34:03 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
There is nothing on this planet which we could be descended from via evolution.

You're prepared to prove a negative?

48 posted on 03/07/2011 3:34:18 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

There are many galaxies out there, some say 100 billion and others feel that 1 trillion is not to large a number for visible galaxies. Given those numbers the juxtaposition of two or threee objects is not all unlikely and when we look at the galaxies we find that it very common.


49 posted on 03/07/2011 3:35:14 PM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Yep. Explaining how matter originated is a hard one for athiests. Explaining how life originated is even harder.

In the 1970s a British astronomer, Fir Frederick Hoyle, calculated the probability of spontaneous generation of a single bacterium. He determined that the probability of generating the proteins necessary to form a single amoeba was one chance in 10 40,000 . To put this in perspective, if an event has the probability of one chance in 10 50 it is considered a mathematical impossibility.

"The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with forty thousand naughts [zeros] after it. It is enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random they must therefor have been the product of purposeful intelligence."

-Sir Frederick Hoyle.

50 posted on 03/07/2011 3:40:24 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

Thank you for the ping.

I watched all nine segments, and it struck me that the “scientific” community is a lot like the medieval church. It establishes a belief and destroys all heretics. It’s a lot like the “anthropogenic global climate change” hoax.

I’m glad that these scientists persisted and are succeeding in getting the truth out about the big bang.

I’m not a researcher anymore and haven’t been one for many years, but when I look at the Astronomy Picture of the Day, I wonder why everything looks so jumbled up if it all originated from one source that is exploding outward.


51 posted on 03/07/2011 3:42:40 PM PST by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best
This is the sort of thing I'm talking about:

Note the channel of material connecting the four objects and try to tell me how that could be just a near/far line-up coincidence.

52 posted on 03/07/2011 3:43:12 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

Yep. I signed up for it via freepmail. I look forward the pings. I find discussions of evolution and intelligent design very interesting. :-)


53 posted on 03/07/2011 3:44:59 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Why be willfully ignorant?

You state that Neanderthal DNA was halfway between ours and chimps, which means we had a common ancestor, not that we descended from neaderthals or chimps.

Besides, Neaderthals created art, hunted, and made fire. Does that sound like an advanced ape to you?

54 posted on 03/07/2011 3:48:29 PM PST by Republican Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

This one needs to be shared. Again there were several major players in it including Fred Hoyle, Arp, Eric Lerner, and Tony Peratt. Apparently it was a 4tv video made in 04 (http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0851217/).


55 posted on 03/07/2011 3:50:44 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Republican Extremist
You state that Neanderthal DNA was halfway between ours and chimps, which means we had a common ancestor, not that we descended from neaderthals or chimps.

Sorry but that's idiotic. A common ancestor would be further removed from us than the neanderthal and all parties agree that the Neanderthal is too far removed to be an ancestor. That's like claiming that dogs are too far genetically removed from wolves to be descended from them and that, therefore, they (dogs) must be descended directly from fish.

Besides, Neaderthals created art, hunted, and made fire. Does that sound like an advanced ape to you?

Certainly it does. You clearly haven't kept up with the last 30 years worth of work with Gorillas. Some of the ones which have been taught deaf signs check out as having IQs in the 90 - 105 range which is adequate for half of all American jobs. It's only the lack of voluntary control of breathing which prevents their speaking English.

56 posted on 03/07/2011 3:55:51 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
The idea of an infinitely old universe is a reversion to beliefs from about the time of Newton. The universe was considered to be a 3-dimensional Euclidean universe, infinite in all 3 directions, and infinitely old.

As Stanley Jaki pointed out in The Paradox of Olbers Paradox, the Paradox should have convinced people that the universe was not infinite in either time or space.

Aside from the idea of a realized infinity being a philosophical absurdity, Olbers Paradox involves the fact that the night sky is dark. If the universe were truly infinite in space and time, everywhere you looked there would be a star (infinite in space), and old enough that the light from every star would have reached the Earth (infinite in time). The night sky would be as bright as the surface of the sun. Since the night sky is dark, the universe cannot be infinite in either space or time.

This doesn't resolve issues such as big bang vs. continuous creation, but it does put a finite limit on the age of the universe.

57 posted on 03/07/2011 4:01:28 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Sorry but that's idiotic. A common ancestor would be further removed from us than the neanderthal and all parties agree that the Neanderthal is too far removed to be an ancestor. That's like claiming that dogs are too far genetically removed from wolves to be descended from them and that, therefore, they (dogs) must be descended directly from fish.

Both of my parents are dead. There does not exist any person I could be a direct descendant of. Does that mean I have no ancestors?

58 posted on 03/07/2011 4:01:53 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

I generally answer intelligent questions...


59 posted on 03/07/2011 4:03:40 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Republican Extremist

Just when you think they couldn’t possibly get MORE cRetarded.


60 posted on 03/07/2011 4:06:20 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson