To: martin_fierro
I...I cant see them (rubs my eyes)
My, how realistic...they just disappeared
2 posted on
01/27/2011 8:02:13 AM PST by
Vaquero
("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: martin_fierro
"Many fans aren't going to be able to tell that these are camouflage uniforms paying tribute to the military." Alright Jack, say that back to yourself.
3 posted on
01/27/2011 8:02:42 AM PST by
Renderofveils
(My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
To: martin_fierro
I see a guy at a podium behind some bushes... what do you see??
Is this a Rorshach [sic] test?
4 posted on
01/27/2011 8:03:22 AM PST by
GeronL
(http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
To: martin_fierro
5 posted on
01/27/2011 8:04:06 AM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: Charles Henrickson
Crypto-Baseball PING
To: martin_fierro
Perhaps the Chargers will also adopt them. They might beef up their running game - defenders won’t see the ball carrier until he’s already past them.
8 posted on
01/27/2011 8:04:44 AM PST by
SoldierDad
(Proud dad of an Army Soldier preparing to deploy to Afghanistan)
To: martin_fierro
I wonder how many more bases Ricky Henderson and Lou Brock have stolen had they worn this camouflage?
Catchers would have had no chance to throw them out.
9 posted on
01/27/2011 8:05:42 AM PST by
TYVets
To: martin_fierro
That's the desert MARPAT...it still ought to stand out fairly well on a green ballfield. This is the woodland MARPAT, which probably would have played havoc with TV cameras...
11 posted on
01/27/2011 8:06:40 AM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: martin_fierro
They should have no problem stealing bases. Of course, the umpire might not see them when they steal home, so it could work against them.
12 posted on
01/27/2011 8:07:14 AM PST by
smokingfrog
(BORN free - taxed to DEATH)
To: All
To: martin_fierro
18 posted on
01/27/2011 8:18:47 AM PST by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
To: martin_fierro
If they’d play better then they wouldn’t have to worry about getting shot at.
19 posted on
01/27/2011 8:26:41 AM PST by
decimon
To: martin_fierro
These new threads are meant to honor the Marines,... BS! They are meant to increase sales of liscensed MLB gee-gaws.
20 posted on
01/27/2011 8:29:17 AM PST by
Roccus
(Joe Biden.....America's only living brain donor.)
To: martin_fierro
Too military.
Won’t be allowed to wear them in Communist Faggy SF to play the Giants. Too many will be “offended”....
24 posted on
01/27/2011 8:58:21 AM PST by
EyeGuy
(Gimme Shelter)
To: martin_fierro
Well, at least they have the advantage of using textile machines to imprint the digital cammo.
This cammo apparently resulted in a ball of used tape that weighed >30 pounds:
To: martin_fierro
We must have had these things when a few of us played wiffle ball in the back yard ... INVISIBLE MAN ON FIRST BASE!
33 posted on
01/27/2011 10:48:12 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: martin_fierro
The Madres need every advantage they can get.
34 posted on
01/27/2011 10:50:12 AM PST by
GSWarrior
(Businessmen are more trustworthy than preachers, professors and politicians.)
To: martin_fierro
Reminds me of the old Monty Python sketch about how not to be seen.
38 posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:46 AM PST by
ssaftler
(Is "Audacity of Hope" English for "Mein Kampf"?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
