Unchartered ping.
Don’t know if Kathryn Hansen is related to James Hansen. Tried web searches without result.
Yeah! I’m gonna believe this. God screwed up when he put plants and trees that produce C02 in our world.
“a new atmosphere-ocean climate modeling study”
Garbage in, garbage out.
Garbage in - garbage out. Findings of a defective computer climate model, from what I’ve seen none have projected a track record that resembles the recent “global warming” history - they’ve so far failed at modeling the earth’s climate, by far.
ABSTRACT:
"Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere [historically] is the product of oceanic respiration due to the well-known but under-appreciated solubility pump. Carbon dioxide rises out of warm ocean waters where it is added to the atmosphere. There it is mixed with residual and accidental CO2, and circulated, to be absorbed into the sink of the cold ocean waters. Next the thermohaline circulation carries the CO2-rich sea water deep into the ocean. A millennium later it appears at the surface in warm waters, saturated by lower pressure and higher temperature, to be exhausted back into the atmosphere. Throughout the past 420 millennia, comprising four interglacial periods, the Vostok record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is imprinted with, and fully characterized by, the physics of the solubility of CO2 in water, along with the lag in the deep ocean circulation.
Notwithstanding that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, atmospheric carbon dioxide has neither caused nor amplified global temperature increases. Increased carbon dioxide has been an effect of global warming, not a cause [historically -etl]. Technically, carbon dioxide is a lagging proxy for ocean temperatures. When global temperature, and along with it, ocean temperature rises, the physics of solubility causes atmospheric CO2 to increase.
If increases in carbon dioxide, or any other greenhouse gas, could have in turn raised global temperatures, the positive feedback would have been catastrophic. While the conditions for such a catastrophe were present in the Vostok record from natural causes, the runaway event did not occur. Carbon dioxide does not accumulate in the atmosphere."
http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2006/10/co2_acquittal.html
This is from the (former) space agency that now exists with the number one mission of making muslims feel good about their contributions to math and science.
Isn't Hansen and the rest of NASA now pretty much tied up with Islamic outreach? They really do the Muslim thing much better than climate science.
More lies from the leftists that lie for satan.
LLS
CO2 level changes FOLLOW temperature changes, not the other way around. That was one of the big farces of AlGore’s movie.
“The notion of low pre-industrial CO2 atmospheric level, based on such poor knowledge, became a widely accepted Holy Grail of climate warming models. The modelers ignored the evidence from direct measurements of CO2 in atmospheric air indicating that in 19th century its average concentration was 335 ppmv.”
Anthropogenic Co2 is .1% of greenhouse gas, this “research” is totally preposterous. GG keeps us from freezing to death.
Just as soon as the model explains how human activity increased the surface temperature on Mars, I’ll be ready to believe it, or begins to account for the sunspot cycle...
Nonsense. If this were true, we would have had a temperature runaway (freezing or boiling), hundreds of millions of years ago, and the Earth would not be livable now.
from: Science Daily
As the sun has matured over the past 4.5 billion years, it has become both brighter and hotter, increasing the amount of solar radiation received by Earth, along with surface temperatures. Earth has coped by reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, thus reducing the warming effect. (Despite current concerns about rising carbon dioxide levels triggering detrimental climate change, the pressure of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has dropped some 2,000-fold over the past 3.5 billion years; modern, man-made increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide offset a fraction of this overall decrease.)
I would also add to this that the hypothesis of CO2 forced warming has some major flaws that seem to flout the laws of thermodynamics. First, in order to increase the temperature, the Earth system energy must be somehow increasing over and above what it receives from the sun. Second, the "trapping" of infrared by CO2 is a transient event, on the order of nanoseconds, IIRC. That's just not enough to cause a long, slow increase in temperature--or even a short, rapid increase. Nor is the trapping directional--CO2 absorbs IR coming from any direction and re-emits it in all directions, making the net effect null anyway.
Wait just a darned minute here! I thought this “fact” was already settled science? Why then are we now hearing about a study that shows what was already known?
Note to all:
Earth once had an atmospheric CO2 level some 10 times present levels.
Temperatures were mild.
Where did all the CO2 go? Well, some of it became limestone. South Florida has about 14,000 feet of limerock beneath it.
ping GW
No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)
That article takes Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.
The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'
It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming
Those four articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.
Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud
That article pretty much puts the kibosh on any serious trend of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign at all of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? Beyond the centuries long slow warming of the earth and rising of the seas of course. But that is only a few millimeters per century due to the inter-glacial period we are in.