Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

August Employment Report: Unemployment- 9.6%, Minus 54,000 jobs.
http://www.cnbc.com/ ^

Posted on 09/03/2010 5:37:58 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA

Per CNBC TV.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bhoeconomy; jobless; obama; obummer; recovery; summer; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Red in Blue PA
Employment Situation Summary Transmission of material in this release is embargoed USDL-10-1212 until 8:30 a.m. (EDT) Friday, September 3, 2010

Guys, I really think something screwy is going on here...

21 posted on 09/03/2010 5:48:27 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

Your PPT in action


22 posted on 09/03/2010 5:48:30 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
And right on queue, Dumbo is floating idea of Stimulus 2. The Democrats are done for November. I guess the meme we had with Clinton is, “Well at least he is doing something”. That model is not working, people are not buying effort, just results, and Boy Wonder gets a solid “F” grade. Sorry Obama epic fail. And for you DU lurkers, yes we are willing to accept and encourage bad news on the economy if it means preserving our country, we are willing to starve you into submission. The whole thing is imploding right around your smug over-educated heads. Come on 10% let's do it! The more Union workers and drones out of work and scrounging around the better. Next time you won't be such covetous lazy pieces of human debris and delight in stealing the work and treasure of others now will ya.
23 posted on 09/03/2010 5:48:33 AM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Because they play a shell game with the numbers, duh.
Seriously, they are not consistent in their math.
24 posted on 09/03/2010 5:50:08 AM PDT by DadOfFive ("Miss me yet?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DadOfFive
Seriously, they are not consistent in their math.

Sure they are! Consistent BS!

25 posted on 09/03/2010 5:53:40 AM PDT by Road Warrior 04 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
... when the numbers are close to 500,000 each week...

A lot of people are not picking up on this number or understanding its significance. I know it took me a while.
This country is bleeding jobs and all D.C. can think to do is spend, spend, spend with a steadily deteriorating taxable base.

26 posted on 09/03/2010 5:55:33 AM PDT by Michael Barnes (Call me when the bullets start flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo

They hid that pretty well in the article didn’t they.

Only someone (like us) that follows this pretty closely would know that it actually went up from 9.5%


27 posted on 09/03/2010 6:03:33 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

What are the average weekly numbers during 5% unemployment?

Just curious...


28 posted on 09/03/2010 6:04:57 AM PDT by TSgt (And the war came.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge
exactly.

4.3% unemployment when Bush was President = worst economy is the great depression.

~10% unemployment when Obama is President = summer of recovery.

29 posted on 09/03/2010 6:05:13 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes
Keep in mind the ~500,000 in job losses each week has to be matched up with the creation of jobs, which is almost as high. It's the difference between the two that yields this 54,000 number. Too many people treat the weekly job losses report as if there were zero jobs being created on the other side.

Obama is giving us enough real bad news, we don't need to invent any fictitious bad news to go along with it.

30 posted on 09/03/2010 6:06:54 AM PDT by Liberty1970 (http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/lydiablievernicht)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

I don’t know yet...Still reading about this subject now that the proverbial blinders have been removed. LOTS to catch up on.


31 posted on 09/03/2010 6:07:14 AM PDT by Michael Barnes (Call me when the bullets start flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970

I get that; still does not deter that we are bleeding jobs.


32 posted on 09/03/2010 6:08:34 AM PDT by Michael Barnes (Call me when the bullets start flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970

good explanation
thanks for posting


33 posted on 09/03/2010 6:08:38 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I think you’re misunderstanding the numbers. The 500k (approx) number is new unemployment claims, but there’s also a similar number of new hires every week, it’s not that another net 500k are jobless each week. This number today is that net monthly number, which actually was not that bad. When you net out the census workers, private payrolls rose 67 k in the month, and last month was revised better too.


34 posted on 09/03/2010 6:15:12 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

People keep falling off the rolls..they are still unemployed but not counted


35 posted on 09/03/2010 6:17:10 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

It Bushes fault.. dont you know?


36 posted on 09/03/2010 6:18:09 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

“similar number of new hires every week” to 500,000????

Tell me you are kidding.


37 posted on 09/03/2010 6:20:53 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970

The problem is many of those “created” jobs go to illegal workers and not citizens.

At some point the tax revenue collected by the feds and states will drop to the point where their ineptness will dawn on them ..I HOPE


38 posted on 09/03/2010 6:25:16 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: massmike

“...but just think how much worse it would be without Obama!”

***

Like under George Bush, when the rate was 8%. :)


39 posted on 09/03/2010 6:33:20 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Of course I’m not kidding. The monthly number is that a net 54k fewer people were employed this month than were last month. That’s rather different from two million, if it were 500k a week with no compensation on the hiring side. Then if you net out the Census workers who were fired last month, Private sector hiring has risen by 174k in the past two months combined. These are real stats, no one is in the tank for anyone, if they were they wouldn’t look as ugly as they do.


40 posted on 09/03/2010 6:58:09 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson