Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA: Make-up artists to the painted mask of tyranny. ....
Sipsey Street Irregulars ^ | 7/11/10 | Mike Vanderboegh

Posted on 07/12/2010 6:35:16 PM PDT by Neil E. Wright

NRA: Make-up artists to the painted mask of tyranny. In the middle of the night, I reget that I rightfully jumped all over an old friend.



"Outside the limit of our sight, feeding off us, perched on top of us, from birth to death, are our owners! Our owners! They have us. They control us! They are our masters! Wake up! They're all about you! All around you!" -- Street Preacher in They Live, 1988.


Folks,

It is almost two in the morning and the dogs are barking outside but that is not why I am awake.

I ran into an old friend at the gun show on Saturday. A long-time libertarian and political activist on behalf of the Second Amendment, I have known him for over fifteen years. We were talking about the NRA, of which he is a Life Member, and he volunteered that he understood the NRA's recent sell-out of the rest of us in cutting their own deal on the DISCLOSE Act.

He also volunteered that if the NRA had not been around we'd have long ago been stripped of the legal right to arms. But, he said, if the NRA endorsed Harry Reid, that was it, that was the end of him and the NRA.

I exploded.

I told him that it would have been better, then, if the NRA had never existed. That it didn't matter what any scrap of paper said, that my liberties are God-given and inalienable and that the sooner the domestic enemies of the Founders' Republic ripped their mask off and declared themselves, the sooner we could get about the business of killing them in earnest and restoring that Republic. The NRA, I said, was like a make-up artist who faithfully retouched the painted mask of the tyrannical monster to lull the peasants out of his own selfish desire to be the last one eaten.

I said all this and more, jumping all over him -- in public, probably humiliating him, yelling, yes, yelling, at him across the table.

He fled.

And now, just now, in the middle of the night a day and and a half later, unable to sleep, I regret the humiliation of an old friend, but not one word of what I said.

There is a very human tendency to hold onto the status quo as long as possible, even if you realize that the status quo cannot continue and at some point there will be a violent breakdown. This is not new in human history.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.


Jefferson was right about that, and even more right about the next breath of the Declaration of Independence.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.


The NRA, with all their artful compromise, are nothing but paid handmaidens to tyranny. In the end, history will not deal kindly with them. They will be viewed, as I have said in these pages more than once, as our present-day equivalent of the Judenraten.

And note I said "paid handmaidens." The irony is that WE, the armed citizenry, are the ones paying them to sell us out. Alleged dragonslayers need dragons to convince the peasantry to continue feeding them. It is not in the interest of the professional dragonslayer to actually slay the dragon. And if more than a few villagers are, over the years, eaten by the dragon, it is of little importance to the "dragonslayer."

And such is the inertia of many of our peasant village comfort zones that we are willing to ignore the obvious and excuse the inexcusable, lest we have to get off our dead asses and fight ourselves to retain our liberty and property as the Founders did.



"You see, I take these glasses off, she looks like a regular person, doesn't she? Put 'em back on... (puts them back on) ..formaldehyde-face!" -- Nada, in They Live, 1988.


In truth, the NRA has been protecting the tyrant-wannabes from us, not the other way around.

It is long past time we recognized that fact.

So I do not regret what I said to my old friend. I do regret the way I said it. It was if I had slapped him. It hurt him, I know. I could see it in his face.

But, in truth, it will be as Sam Adams said long ago:

“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”


Yet, still and all, it is me who is up in the middle of the night, regretting my part in an old friend's discomfiture, even though I was right.

Mike
III



TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: bananas; banglist; crackers; freedom; nra; nuts; slavery
From the comments to the article, a little history of the NRA:

All Southern men and women should know about the founding of the NRA and why it remains an adjunct to government control of our lives as it was founded to do. Among anti-freedom "clubs" only the Union League Clubs of Philadelphia, New York, and Chicago are older. All were founded in order to enhance the ability of the US government to kill Americans who would be free. I am also old enough to remember when the NRA had a loyalty oath and required the endorsement of a member for a new membership application to be processed.

Then, moving on to the 20th century, the NRA endorsed the first national gun control law, the prohibition upon shipping handguns via the US mail, throwing that job into the much more expensive Railway Express. The NRA went on to write the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control Act of 1968, and the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986; all to restrict our rights access and to help the US government control us.

The upshot of this is that the NRA will continue its long history of curbing our rights in aid of the US government via endorsements of thugs like Harry Reid.

★ FREEDOM! ★

1 posted on 07/12/2010 6:35:21 PM PDT by Neil E. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

The NRA was go along and get along on banning hi cap mags under the Brady Bill.

My guess is they will endorse no one in NV but I think we all need to realize - they are not our friends.


2 posted on 07/12/2010 6:42:36 PM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Bang!


3 posted on 07/12/2010 6:45:08 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Ping.


4 posted on 07/12/2010 6:49:17 PM PDT by Eaker (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

You know the spiel.

The NRA is playing both sides to make gains in Dem land. R is for rifle not for Republican, yada, yada, yada.


5 posted on 07/12/2010 6:54:54 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
N.R.A. fought tooth and nail against the G.C.A., particurlarly the mail order stuff. N.R.A. supported the original F.O.P.A. because it protected transport of legal firearms across state lines and restored legal importation of various miltary weapons that BATF had classed as "non-sporting".

"...all to restrict our rights access and to help the US government control us."

This statement is vile, and unless you intend to begin your shooting war against anyone who infringes your rights, you have no place making such a comment.

6 posted on 07/12/2010 7:02:17 PM PDT by sig226 (Bring back Jimmy Carter!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

They need gunowners and shooters more than we need them;
they can keep whoring themselves out to lefties and even start calling themselves TBB (`The Brady Bunch’).
We will still win. We win every day that we remain armed.


7 posted on 07/12/2010 7:03:53 PM PDT by tumblindice (tohellwiththenra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

An organization is as good as its leaders. I don’t care what the NRA did 76 years ago. I don’t even care what the NRA 42 years ago.

I care what they have done lately. Heller v. DC was the NRA. McDonald v Chicago was the NRA, not Alan Gura who cluelessly tried to argue it on P&I terms.

You have the NRA’s support of Harry Reid to thank that, after total Democrat rule for the past 2 years, no new gun regulations went into effect - and concealed carry in national parks was passed. Harry Reid is a despicable politician on most issues. But his NRA endorsement means a lot to his electorate in a state full of hunters like Nevada. So, his votes are largely in line with him.

Spoken more frankly, I can’t talk common sense into people who choose to ignore any political strategy. For them, it’s “their way or the highway,” and sit baffled when nothing goes their way. Politics is about “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours,” and the NRA is one of the most savvy lobbies there is out there. Unfortunately, it makes the people who despise politics angry.

Or, ignore what I said, and waste your dollars on the GOA so they can churn out more anti-NRA literature and do jack s**t for your gun rights.


8 posted on 07/12/2010 7:15:24 PM PDT by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226; Jim Robinson; A Navy Vet; dcwusmc; All
The NRA has been selling out gunowners for decades, if not for the last almost 100 years. Starting with NFA '34. Deny the history if you can. As to the line you quote, if you'll actually READ what I posted you'll see that quote did not actually come from me, although I agree with it. Only this time we won't fire the first shot in the coming war. NO MORE FORT SUMTERs, but also no more free Waco's, Ruby Ridge's or Katrina's.

I would draw everyone's attention to this thread: Making Amends: A Mini-Manifesto

★ FREEDOM! ★

9 posted on 07/12/2010 7:23:06 PM PDT by Neil E. Wright (An OATH is FOREVER OathKeeper III We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Do you always make it a point to believe anything some anti-gun, NRA-hating blogger posts? You probably believe everything CNN reports too.


10 posted on 07/12/2010 7:46:13 PM PDT by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
"I came here to chew bubblegum, and kick a**. And I'm all outta bubblegum."

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

11 posted on 07/12/2010 7:56:19 PM PDT by wku man (Claire Wolfe's clock is winding down...tick......tick..........tick...............tick..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
" I told him that it would have been better, then, if the NRA had never existed.

Nonsense. The NRA ILA attorneys have been aggressive the last few years. A lot of pro 2nd Amendment court rulings are largely due to the NRA.

... the sooner we could get about the business of killing them in earnest and restoring that Republic.

Killing them in earnest? Really?

The NRA, I said, was like a make-up artist who faithfully retouched the painted mask of the tyrannical monster to lull the peasants out of his own selfish desire to be the last one eaten.

OK... so according to this nutjob,he exploded in a restaurant saying things like we would be better off without the NRA, and the real purpose of the NRA is to help disguise tyrants to lull in the peasants.

This anti-NRA conspiracy moonbat kook nonsense is getting ridiculous.

I can't say I have agreed with all the NRA stances in the past, but overall they have done a good job. They have especially done a good job in the last three years. If another group can do better, then bring it... I would love to see it, the more groups standing up for our 2nd Amendment rights the better. The NRA is not the enemy, not even close.

12 posted on 07/12/2010 8:04:25 PM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
I told you that there would be consequences from the current leadership of the NRA selling out on the Disclose Act and from jumping in bed with the Democratic leadership on the hill. Can you imagine the outrage if the exemption clause of the Disclose Act is ruled unconstitutional?

It's only going to get worse until the NRA leadership is either voted out, resign or make amends by stopping some other catastrophe. The NRA coming down hard against Kagan and warning any Senators voting for her is a good start. I'm glad to see they're finally using a little strategy and acting out of principle instead of trying to cut deals with the devil.

I still think LaPierre, Cox and the other guy are dumber than a box of rocks but I hope they can prove me wrong.

13 posted on 07/12/2010 8:22:25 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Errant
I told you that there would be consequences...

Rants from some anti-gun, NRA-hating blogger are "consequences"?


14 posted on 07/12/2010 8:35:52 PM PDT by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Hahaha... I like you because you’re just soooo funnie!!!


15 posted on 07/12/2010 8:37:32 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Errant; All
I do love how the NRA groupies always start their post with...

"You Lie!

or "The NRA has done some very bad things in the past, BUT..."

or "The NRA leadership is just bunch of geniuses fighting a political game that you idiots are just to stupid to figure out..."

or "No other 2A group can do what the NRA does..."

or they turn it into some "conspiracy" based attack... instead of calling it what it is... Absolute TRAITOROUS behavior by the NRA on our First and Second Amendment rights.

LaPierre and the BOD need to go, ASAP! Before they can destroy a great organization.

16 posted on 07/13/2010 3:53:16 AM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

And actually the original writing was put out by Mike Vanderboegh of the Sipsey Street Irregulars, notably one of the modern patriots in the Constitutional movement...


17 posted on 07/13/2010 4:06:56 AM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

I read what you wrote. It was BS, pure propaganda from someone whose interest is to twist facts into deceit. NRA in 1934 was not the same organization as NRA in 1968, or in 1986. For the record, they did oppose federal gun controls in 1934, but they weren’t a political operation. For the record, plenty of newspapers also opposed federal gun controls at the same time, which provides an insight into the matter.

NRA started with opposition to the original GCA, which I think began as SB 100, sometime around early 1963. It gained momentum after the Kennedy assasination. NRA spent years - literally years - trying to get the feds to drop the idea and enforce the provisions of the 1937 Federal Firearms Act. The NRA lost that fight, in a democrat House, democrat Senate, with a democrat President. NRA also wasn’t a lobbying group before that happened. It wasn’t their main focus, neither is it now. NRA-ILA is the lobby.

As I already said, NRA supported the FOPA because it removed federal and state sanctions on various firearms and on travel with firearms. They got stuck with the machine gun ban, and Ronald Reagan signed it.

Do you hate him, too?


18 posted on 07/13/2010 5:57:09 AM PDT by sig226 (Bring back Jimmy Carter!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet
I do love how the NRA groupies always start their post with...

You have to wonder if some of these "NRA groupies" are paid NRA bloggers.

19 posted on 07/13/2010 7:55:08 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Errant
You have to wonder if some of these "NRA groupies" are paid NRA bloggers.

I actually do wonder if that is the case, every single time the NRA steps in it, no matter how damning the evidence, they always come out of the woodwork and are fairly rabid in their defense... up to and including attacking fellow 2A activists for doing nothing more than debating the issue... so yes, in a few cases I am sure that is true.

20 posted on 07/13/2010 12:37:47 PM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson