We should have never shutdown the one in Texas...
To: The SISU kid; Empireoftheatom48; Rio; Iowan; hattend; reader25; july4thfreedomfoundation; ...
For other space news go to: http://www.spacetoday.net
For a list of Private Space Companies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_spaceflight_companies
2 posted on
12/05/2009 4:27:01 PM PST by
KevinDavis
(Can't Stop the Signal!)
To: KevinDavis
We should have never shutdown the one in Texas...
Clinton did that in Waxahatchi when it was half built-stupid decision, another stupid decision.
3 posted on
12/05/2009 4:33:10 PM PST by
Cordio
To: KevinDavis
We should have never shutdown the one in Texas... Mostly because if it had created a mini black hole that destroyed 10,000 square miles of Texas, no one would have noticed. :)
4 posted on
12/05/2009 4:36:02 PM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
("If you cannot pick it up and run with it, you don't really own it." -- Robert Heinlein)
To: KevinDavis
I guess if or when they produce a black hole or another big bang it should take just a blink of the eye and we will all be toast.
5 posted on
12/05/2009 4:36:43 PM PST by
guitarplayer1953
(Romak 7.62X54MM, AK47 7.62X39MM, LARGO 9X23MM, HAPINESS IS A WARM GUN BANG BANG YEA YEA)
To: KevinDavis
The LHC can supposedly produce collisions with energy of around 7x10^12 eV. The hightest ultra-high energy cosmic rays, however, are around 3x10^20 eV. That gives cosmic rays, which have been hitting the earth for billions of years, about 40 billion times the energy that the LHC can produce. So far, no earth-gobbling black holes. Another thing, collisions at very near the speed of light produce secondary particles also travelling near the speed of light. So any black holes created as a result would fly through the earth and into space in less than a second. Thirdly, there Hawking radiation. A black hole of such low mass would evaporate in a nano-second at most.
6 posted on
12/05/2009 4:39:07 PM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The right thing is not always the popular thing)
To: KevinDavis
Another example of science playing around with nature and not knowing the after effects.
9 posted on
12/05/2009 4:44:32 PM PST by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: KevinDavis
Who knows? It may open a doorway to a parallel universe.
11 posted on
12/05/2009 4:48:16 PM PST by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
To: KevinDavis
Look at the bright side - the collider may save us from global warming!
17 posted on
12/05/2009 4:58:47 PM PST by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: KevinDavis
If the doomsayers are serious about shutting the project down then it is time they altered their approach. All they need do is pay off some scientists at that CRU place to produce data indicating that the facility emits as much carbon as one of Al Gore’motorcades and then the good folks meeting in Copenhagen can legislate it out of existence.
23 posted on
12/06/2009 5:28:44 AM PST by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: KevinDavis
What is really scary is that the LHC is being run by a bunch of arrogant euro-weenies. The same type of juveniles doing climate “research”.
24 posted on
12/06/2009 8:02:51 AM PST by
LiberConservative
("There's plenty of room for all Alaska's animals - right next to the mashed potatoes." -Sarah Palin)
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
25 posted on
12/06/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: KevinDavis
High temperature superconductive wire, advanced magnet and computer control technology was not available at the time the Texas Super-Conductor Collider (SSC) was being built early 1990s. Using the technology available at the time would have created a very expensive, under-performing “white elephant.” Congress pitted it against the then U.S. Space Station Freedom. The space station barely survived by a single vote. Not enough pork spread around the country on the SSC to keep it alive. All in all, the proper choice was to shut down the SCC before the larger costs were incurred.
37 posted on
12/06/2009 10:24:04 PM PST by
anymouse
(God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson