Skip to comments.How to map the multiverse
Posted on 05/05/2009 5:33:31 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
It is worth noting that you can buy a used copy of the hardcover version of this book for about $7 including shipping on Amazon. That's less that half the price you would pay for the paperback at the local Borders.
Both are great books, but I HIGHLY recommend The Elegant Universe.. probably one of the most well written and fascinating books on cosmology I have ever read. It’s the kinda book you want to go back over and re-read sections of. I give it 2 thumbs up.
It was the best NOVA program, and one of the clearest explanations of Quantum Mechanics, that I'd ever seen.
Definitely second that - cannot recommend The Elegant Universe highly enough.
I certainly agree with all of the praise offered for “The Elegant Universe.” It was virtually my only companion during a rainy week in Virginia Beach, and I was fascinated and entertained by it from cover to cover. Green’s string theory was elegant, but it was, by definition, impossible to observe and to verify. Too bad because the rising possibilities inherent in it of alternate universes really appealed to me. It was quite soothing to think that somewhere, in one of those alternate universes, I was in Virginia Beach with the hottest babe in the world and we were indescribably happy together. :)
· Google ·
Quantifying time is the key IMO. If that is not done, all physical theories fall apart, again just my opinion.
To GGG: Regarding your keywords belongsinreligion and
notasciencetopic - when you start posting your threads into religion or chat, you can add such keywords. Until then, dont.
I put “belongs in religion” on some evo posts because the evos have been tagging my posts with that forever. And if you click on the keywords “belongs in religion” “propellerbeenie” “notasciencetopic” “spammer” etc, you will see that I (and a number of other Creationists and IDers) were the subject of an evo keyword attack yesterday. So I retaliated. In retrospect, I shouldn’t have done that, I should have just complained to the mods. But then again, certain mods tell me to “shut up” or “stop hitting the abuse button” no matter what.
I’m sure you will be giving the evos who launched the keyword attack yesterday the same warning, so I’m quite confident that this will cease to be a problem on all sides of the origins debate after today.
All the best—GGG
If you have issues with keywords, bring them to the attention of the moderators.
Please try bringing it to our attention on the specific threads - the keywords are tied to those threads. Oh, and not all keywords are abusive if they are an expression of a poster's opinion on the thread subject and are not profane or personal attacks.
Ok...so if I sincerely believe evo threads “belong in religion” than I’m in the clear. Got it.
Sorry for the hijack of your string theory thread.
GodGunsGuts (GGG) is a creationist that spams the news forum with several creationist threads every day.
He believes anything that is not in line with a 6000 year old earth or the rest of the bible to be an atheist, liberal, Nazi, communist, racist, etc (people have been called all of those by GGG or his groupies)plot.
Please ignore him and go back to your interesting discussion.
I haven’t read the Fabric of the Cosmos yet, but I loved the Elegant Universe. Excellent read.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.