Posted on 04/23/2008 7:52:53 AM PDT by Tolkien
Photos of carefree Parisians lazing in cafes, flocking to cinemas or enjoying a day at the races during the Nazi occupation have sparked outrage in Paris and calls for the exhibit to be shut down.
The word “collaborator” used to be the ultimate insult to the generation that fought WW2.
With today’s Leftists, it’s a prerequisite.
Photos of carefree Parisians lazing in cafes, flocking to cinemas or enjoying a day at the races during the Nazi occupation have sparked outrage in Paris and calls for the exhibit to be shut down.
The 270 unpublished photographs by Andre Zucca, a French photographer who worked for the Nazi propaganda magazine Signal, are billed as the only major collection of colour pictures taken during the four years of the Paris occupation.
The photo exhibit showing women in polka-dot dresses strolling down Paris boulevards and children playing at the Luxembourg gardens is under fire for failing to mention that thousands of Jews were deported and countless other Parisians endured hardship during the 1940-1944 occupation.
A picture of an elderly woman dressed in a black coat emblazoned with the yellow star and a second one of a man also wearing the badge of shame in Paris’ Jewish quarter offer the only hint of Nazi persecution.
The head of cultural affairs at Paris city hall, Christophe Girard, called at the weekend for the exhibit called “Parisians under the Occupation” at the Paris City History Library to be shut down, saying he was “upset” by the photographs.
Zucca’s “outlook shows nothing, or very little, of the reality of the occupation,” said Girard.
But Paris Mayor Bertrand Delanoe stepped in the fray and said the exhibit would be allowed to continue as scheduled until July after ordering city historians to provide additional information to give visitors a fuller picture.
Visitors are now handed an information sheet, written in French, English and Spanish, explaining that Zucca “has opted for a vision that doesn’t show — or hardly shows — the reality of occupation and its tragic aspects.”
Jean Derens, the director of the library who commissioned the exhibit, said it would amount to censorship to shut down the exhibit and not show what he described as “exceptional works”.
“These photographs are very powerful,” said Derens, who shot back at calls for more detailed descriptions of each photograph to give context. “We need to give information on who took it and when, and then let the viewer take in the photograph.”
The Paris library decided to organise the exhibit after thousands of negatives from Zucca photographs it had purchased in 1986 were digitized, allowing much of the colour of the original works to be restored.
But for Parisian Gilles Perreault, who was caught on film by Zucca as an 11-year-old bespectacled boy, pushing his toy boat on the pond of the Luxembourg gardens, the exhibit shows a “false image” of Paris during those four years.
“Yes I was this easy-going boy who played with his boat, but I was also afraid,” recounted Perreault. “My parents were resistance fighters and I knew what it meant.”
Perreault said the exhibit is silent about the Nazi persecution of Jews and other campaigns of repression as well as the food rationing and poverty that plagued the city.
“I think if young people come to this exhibit and only see these pictures, they will come away with the wrong impression,” he said.
One of the photographs shows a large banner of the Nazi swastika hanging from a building on the boulevards while a sandwich-board sign below offers theatre tickets for sale.
Bevies of Parisian women are shown smiling with their beaus, putting on lipstick or wearing floppy hats at the Longchamp race track, while German officers look on in the background.
More than 10,000 people have flocked to the exhibit since it opened on March 20, most of them over the past days as the controversy over the show heated up.
I thought every single person was in the French Underground!
Descriptions of this sort would help put the exhibited photographs in a more complete context.
I wonder if an exhibit of pictures showing only unpleasant scenes would also be criticised.
I agree. As horrible and monsterish the Nazi's were, they are humanitarian compared to the modern day Nazi's - the Muslims.
They want the entire world under Sharia law. That's what liberals don't understand.
Even though the photographer selected particular scenes that fit his message, that doesn't mean the scenes didn't occur. (The elderly man having confirmed that he was, in fact, once a little boy playing with a boat in the park.) Since color photography was fairly rare at the time, the photographs have a historic interest simply for that reason.
No reasonable viewer would conclude that the exhibit was a complete depiction of life in Nazi-occupied Paris.
What? You mean all of the French were not in the resistance? No kidding?
True. More than likely many of the photos were staged. I doubt the Nazis allowed regular French citizens to walk around Paris taking photos at random.
I saw a figure once for how many children were born to French women by German men during the occupation...I think it was 200,000. Presumably the number of French women who had affairs with Germans during this period was many times larger than the number who became pregnant.
French combat casualties for the Battle of Nomandy: Zero
I would think that people in occupied France, or any other country for that matter, would try to go about their lives as best they could in the circumstances. This would include shopping, seeking entertainment, traveling to visit friends and relatives, etc. The Germans didn’t spend every waking moment arresting, beating, interrogating or killing the inhabitants of the countries they had occupied. And from what I have read France was not subjected to anywhere near the same levels of oppression as were nations like Poland or the occupied portions of the USSR. And the Germans looked upon duty in France as pleasant (certainly compared with duty on the Eastern Front) and people in that frame of mind aren’t likely to be too eager to screw up what, to them, was a good thing. Most people would try and make the best of a lousy situation I should think. Add to this that a lot of people, while likely not happy with the situation, would have taken somthing close to a “live and let live” attitude to the whole mess. Not everyone is a heroic resistance fighter or even much more than a luke-warm patriot (and some would not be patriotic at all).
And then there were those who were OK with the occupation. France’s defeat in 1941 was due in no small part to the defeatism and pacifism that had infected a significant portion of the population. Some of these people would have suffered a rude awakening as the occupation carried forward but I bet not few were just fine with it. We have people like this in our country today: defeatists; seditious types who would welcome the defeat of America and have no problem at all with an occupying power. Not all of them would actively collaborate but would certainly not work to hinder the occupier either.
L
The Michael Moore of the WWII generation. Now if he had contrasted that blissful times under the Nazis with the evil Americans bombing France in a movie , it would have been an Oscar winner for sure.
The word “gay” has been appropriated by the homosexual community and re-defined. The title threw me off.
While some of these were probably "affairs", I would assume a substantial number were rapes by the conquering forces. The Nazis had a habit of taking whatever they wanted, whether it was freely offered or not. French women would have no useful means of accusation during the occupation, and later, what's the point if the rapist was killed in battle or chased home?
> Presumably the number of French women who had affairs with Germans during this period was many times larger than the number who became pregnant.
Presumably, but remember, the German people are notable for their efficiency. ;-)
I’m guessing the one’s in the resistance that died and their loved ones, would disagree.
Facts are facts. The vast majority of French collabirated with vim and vigor. It was only after the Nazies lost that suddenly everyone claimed to have been in the resistance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.