Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Up to two-thirds the size of Earth is not “Earth-sized”

Predicted? Meaning they don’t really have any evidence


36 posted on 10/26/2013 4:18:05 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

Who sez up to 2/3rds isn’t Earth-sized, you? Big deal.

The evidence for an undiscovered outer solar system body consists of comet focusing (Matese et al); the large (Pluto-sized) bodies on very long, eccentric orbits (Brown et al); and the people in this article based their figures on a computer simulation based on retrocalculating the orbits of known bodies; others.

The perturbation of Neptune, detected not many years after discovery and the calculation of its ephemeris, has been attributed by some to a few bad observations, but that’s a minority view. My own minority view is, the perturbation was brief because the planetary body is either A) orbiting more or less in the ecliptic, but in retrograde, so everyone looking for it winds up looking in the wrong direction, or B) orbiting out of the ecliptic, and perhaps also in retrograde.


41 posted on 10/26/2013 9:15:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL
Up to two-thirds the size of Earth is not “Earth-sized”

Then the article says between 30% to 70% the size of the Earth, so that would mean half the size of Earth if the theory is correct.

48 posted on 10/26/2013 9:24:59 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson