Posted on 03/18/2007 7:52:24 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
Do I detect HAPPINESS here?
Depends...
I wont need Depends for another 2 years. Good feud goin on tho!
I wont need Depends for another 20 years. Good feud goin on tho!
Another 2 years?
ROTF!
Smart a$$........I fixed it on the next post : )
And despite claims, you have yet to document one in this thread.
I've shown several incorrect claims
Blah, blah, strawman, blah. Talk to me when you find they've falsified court papers, transcripts and other documents they've dug up that are quite damning to SCO.
^^^^^^^^^^^Do I detect HAPPINESS here?^^^^^^^^^^^
Well that depends on what your definition of 'is' is.
LMAO!!
Thank you for one of the funniest scenes in film history!
...by far
GE cycles from trying to have serious debate to a troll to a caricature of a troll depending on the phase of the moon, right now he is a bad caricature of a troll...
More proof of your BS defending "leftist loons".
InformationWeek: IBM Helps Fund Web Hosting For Anti-SCO Site Groklaw
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=198100504
How many times have you claimed this wasn't true? I'd have to go back and look, but I'd say at least 10 times. At least.
Proof? Do you read anything more than misleading headlines? There is zero new information in the article. This has already been brought up -- and shot down -- on this board several times as you mention. Groklaw existed before moving to ibiblio, and it moved according to standard ibiblio criteria, along with Project Gutenberg (which is a lot older than ibiblio, about as old as the Internet itself). There are over 1,600 sites comprising 8 terabytes of data with 15 million hits a day at ibiblio. That's one hell of a conspiracy theory.
The article is quite clear, and after interviewing the directorof the project reports quote "IBM's financial support is ongoing".
For you to continue your lies they do not is just further proof of your endless dishonesty.
Let me get this straight. IBM, along with other companies, sponsors ibiblio way back in 2000, when The SCO Group was still a Linux company. At the time, ibiblio starts hosting hundreds of sites for free, and all the sites have to do is fit the basic criteria (basically, non-profit and interesting).
The next year The SCO Group buys Santa Cruz's server division and a couple years later sues IBM. Groklaw, hosted at a free service, starts covering it. Groklaw gets popular, has to move, goes to hosting provided by a reader, melts that server, and finally applies to ibiblio. Groklaw is accepted since it meets the criteria.
You are being dishonest and need to remove the tin foil hat if you actually can twist that into Groklaw being influentially funded by IBM, or being an IBM front.
I'd love to get the time machine that IBM had to know to commit funding to ibiblio in order to counter a UNIX suit three years in the future by a then Linux company.
His point is, and yes its a stupid one but lets not overlook it:
IBM still gives money (we dont know how much) to ibiblio, the question he needs to be asked is aside from editorial content / debate, is there anything facutally wrong on the site regarding sco v ibm? All groklaw does is put up the public court documents from the case and then comment on it.
Your point is more than valid if we through out every article from a site that takes money from MS (say in the form of a grant, or advertising) you would not be able to use any of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.