His point is, and yes its a stupid one but lets not overlook it:
IBM still gives money (we dont know how much) to ibiblio, the question he needs to be asked is aside from editorial content / debate, is there anything facutally wrong on the site regarding sco v ibm? All groklaw does is put up the public court documents from the case and then comment on it.
Your point is more than valid if we through out every article from a site that takes money from MS (say in the form of a grant, or advertising) you would not be able to use any of it.
LMAO! "stupid" is somebody claiming Jokelaw is independent of IBM when IBM is paying to host their website. Or claiming Jokelaw info is accurate when they've been denying that connection and even caught covering up for illegal hacking. But since it does involve "leftist loons" and illegal hacking, it's no surprise you 2 are here defending it.