I wonder what MS' real aims are.................
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Can we now look forward to security attacks aimed at Linux, and a gazillion monthly security updates?
2 posted on
11/06/2006 8:07:07 AM PST by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: ShadowAce
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
So, when is this apocalypse suppose to start?
"In all good time!"
5 posted on
11/06/2006 8:55:40 AM PST by
stacytec
(Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I don't know their aims but it could be good news. Excellent infrastructure around a good conservative (no pan) kernel would be welcome. And it would give Sun something to think about.
6 posted on
11/06/2006 9:32:36 AM PST by
aliquis
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I wonder what MS' real aims are....Whatever they are I hope the whole upshot of this move is that programs that run on Windows will now be ported to Linux.
7 posted on
11/06/2006 9:40:16 AM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Mathemeticians are machines that turn coffee into theorems.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I wonder what MS' real aims are... The same as always, to get paid for their intellectual property, instead of giving it away for free like leftist Richard Stallman wants. In this case, Novell has agreed to pay them patent royalties for Linux, while MS tries to sell Novell Linux to their customers. Might not work for Novell though, since most existing Linux users have an unending hatred of Microsoft, and would apparently rather just download stuff from DVD Jon in Amsterdam than worry about properly paying for their IP. Still, there may be enough new interest in Novell to make up for it, only time will tell.
8 posted on
11/06/2006 11:42:47 AM PST by
Golden Eagle
(Buy American. While you still can.)
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
11 posted on
11/06/2006 6:59:50 PM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
To stay out of court and use the money to try and innovate.
12 posted on
11/06/2006 7:01:26 PM PST by
Doohickey
(I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
It's possible, just possible, that this is legit. Gates is stepping down as head technologist for Microsoft and Ray Ozzie is announced as his successor. Ozzie would do this and mean it.
If that is the case then this could get real interesting.
17 posted on
11/06/2006 7:05:19 PM PST by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
>>This is stunning. This is like Red Sox fans announcing they're going to root for the Yankees.<<
It really feels more like the Yankees paying off a minor league Boston team to make sure the Red Sox are no longer a threat.
19 posted on
11/06/2006 7:10:41 PM PST by
gondramB
(It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
22 posted on
11/06/2006 7:12:17 PM PST by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
It is stuning...
OTOH with the exception of one laptop running SLED, I no longer run Suse...
Still, it's sad to see a good distro die a slow painful death...
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Watch for 'extensions' that make it proprietary.
And in the bigger picture, watch for standardization of a new hybrid that will work for globalists.
37 posted on
11/07/2006 6:13:23 AM PST by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I wonder what MS' real aims are................. Mostly technical, I'd guess. They've been trying to get away from a DOS-based architecture for a looong time. Why not use a Linux base instead? They no doubt also see the trends, and don't want to get left with a dinosaur OS.
Sound business move.
53 posted on
11/07/2006 7:37:46 AM PST by
r9etb
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
MS' real aim : To make Linux as bug-ridden, crash-prone, and un-secure as Windows.
Microsoft deserves the same fate as Enron, and Bill Gates and Steven Ballmer both deserve the same fates as Lay and Skillings.
77 posted on
11/07/2006 6:07:19 PM PST by
bigdcaldavis
(Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson