Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jolie Picks Place On "Atlas"
Dark Horizons ^ | Sept 21 | Garth Franklin

Posted on 09/22/2006 3:18:25 AM PDT by everitt12

That rumour from the other month is now confirmed, Angelina Jolie is set to star in the film adaptation of Ayn Rand's iconic tome "Atlas Shrugged" for Lionsgate reports Variety.

Jolie, a longtime fan of Rand's, was eager to play the role of Dagney Taggart, the most powerful female character in any of Rand's books.

A movie version of the Russian-born author's novel, which runs more than 1,100 pages, has been long in the making. For years, producer Al Ruddy tried to bring "Atlas Shrugged" to the bigscreen, attracting the interest of Clint Eastwood, Robert Redford and Faye Dunaway along the way.

Howard and Karen Baldwin ("Ray") hold the rights to this most ambitious novel of Rand's, and are producing.


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: angelinajolie; atlasshrugged; aynrand; ironic; jolie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
I cannot believe that Angelina Jolie, Saint UNICEF herself, has been chosen to play Dagney Taggert. It's ironic if not moronic. I'm not really a Rand follower, but I think if she were alive today Rand would pull the plug on this casting.

I realize Jolie is just an actress, and nice eye candy, but she's also basically a socialist. And when someone in the public eye chooses to lend their name to a cause or endorses a set of values, it colors the way the public recieves their work.

Finally, I believe that the core audiance for this film will be Rand's hardcore readers. They will probably be completly outraged. Somebody start the boycott clock.

1 posted on 09/22/2006 3:18:27 AM PDT by everitt12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: everitt12

An actor's job is to be someone they aren't. It's what they get paid for. Relax, eh?


2 posted on 09/22/2006 3:20:02 AM PDT by Glenn (Annoy a BushBot...Think for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everitt12
If she can keep her big mouth shut and not pretend to be an geopolitical analysis that needs to inform us poor slobs of her apparent brilliance and just act and do it well, I have no problem with her being cast as Dagney Taggert.
3 posted on 09/22/2006 3:23:10 AM PDT by Popman ("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everitt12

Straight to hell with the movie! (Read the book!)


4 posted on 09/22/2006 3:26:46 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I gigged your peace frog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everitt12

So who is John Galt?


5 posted on 09/22/2006 3:31:21 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonfire

I'm not sure if anyone has been cast, but Brad Pitt is listed on the IMDB as being in talks to play the part. Honestly, Pitt seems like he would be a good choice for the role. His Tyler Durder is one of the greatest characters in modern film, IMHO. The rest of the cast is still up in the air.


6 posted on 09/22/2006 3:42:14 AM PDT by everitt12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: everitt12
"Finally, I believe that the core audiance for this film will be Rand's hardcore readers. They will probably be completly outraged"

I don't know anything about her politics, but if she's really a Rand fan, she's not a socialist. She at least comes off as a good personality fit with Dagney.

7 posted on 09/22/2006 4:01:45 AM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everitt12

Liberals have a funny way they interpret things. Who can read the First Amendment and think that it protects the right to expose oneself in public but does not protect someone from saying a prayer in public?


8 posted on 09/22/2006 4:15:56 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everitt12
"Finally, I believe that the core audiance for this film will be Rand's hardcore readers. They will probably be completly outraged"

True.

9 posted on 09/22/2006 4:25:01 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everitt12
... Pitt is also being touted to replace Tom Cruise in the Mission Impossible sequels.....!
10 posted on 09/22/2006 5:02:29 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: everitt12
"His Tyler Durder is one of the greatest characters in modern film, IMHO."

His name is Tyler Durden.

Signed,
his name is robertpaulsen

11 posted on 09/22/2006 5:03:05 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: everitt12
My choices: Jude Law as Hank Rearden and Gwyneth Paltrow as Dagney Taggart.


12 posted on 09/22/2006 5:17:23 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: everitt12

I would be more concerned with who writes the screenplay than with who does the acting.


13 posted on 09/22/2006 8:32:32 AM PDT by oldsalt (There's no such thing as a free lunch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everitt12
If Jolie really thinks she's a Rand Fan, she really exposes herself to be totally toopid.
14 posted on 09/22/2006 8:39:33 AM PDT by Miss Behave (You can't negotiate with people who want to kill you more than they want to live. ~Caller to Hannity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonfire

So who is John Galt?


They haven't decided yet but how about James Woods?

Baldwin for Mooch?


15 posted on 09/22/2006 8:42:39 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bonfire

Hee hee . . . you've been waiting forever to ask that in context, haven't you? ;)


16 posted on 09/22/2006 8:43:53 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Jeez, and y'all laugh at Texans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: everitt12

I like to mock Brad Pitt as much as the next guy, but I have to admit, he isn't scared to look and act nasty in pursuit of acting excellence.

His "12 Monkeys" character was electrifying. Tyler Durden was magnificent.

He may very well be the John Lithgow of the younger set - such a chameleon, you forget you're watching Brad Pitt.


17 posted on 09/22/2006 8:45:04 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Jeez, and y'all laugh at Texans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

That was such a visually odd movie! Almost plastic-looking.


18 posted on 09/22/2006 8:45:42 AM PDT by Xenalyte (Jeez, and y'all laugh at Texans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: everitt12
She's been selected for a movie role, not for president.

A bit of perspective here.

19 posted on 09/22/2006 8:45:46 AM PDT by Military family member (GO Colts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

"Yes, at first I was happy to be learning how to read. It seemed exciting and magical, but then I read this: Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand. I read every last word of this garbage, and because of this piece of s--t, I am never reading again."

20 posted on 09/22/2006 8:48:00 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson