Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense: DNA tests show no link to Duke lacrosse
ESPN.com ^ | May 12, 2006 | n/a

Posted on 05/12/2006 6:43:47 PM PDT by zaxxon

RALEIGH, N.C. -- A second round of DNA testing in the Duke University lacrosse rape case came back with the same result as the first -- no conclusive match to any member of the team, defense attorneys said Friday.

Attorney Joseph Cheshire, who represents a team captain who has not been charged, said the tests showed genetic material from a "single male source" was found on a vaginal swab taken from the accuser, but that material did not match any of the players.

"In other words, it appears this woman had sex with a male," said Cheshire, who spoke at a news conference with other defense attorneys in the case. "It also appears with certainty it wasn't a Duke lacrosse player."

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.espn.go.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: allegations; cheshire; dna; duke; dukelax; falseallegations; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2006 6:43:52 PM PDT by zaxxon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zaxxon

BS case from the beginning.


2 posted on 05/12/2006 6:46:42 PM PDT by Galtoid ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
If the DNA doesn't match - you must acquit!

And, start looking at charges of false police report.

3 posted on 05/12/2006 6:53:06 PM PDT by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zaxxon

How many times do I gotta say GAME OVER

All you had to do was watch Nancy Grace..she got off this fast when the guy blew the DA out of the water at the newser


4 posted on 05/12/2006 6:54:39 PM PDT by skaterboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winston2

I don't know who will be sued, but I think this is going to be a major deal concerning the parents of every Duke Lacrosse team member. Defamation, false accusation, police misconduct, false arrest, and on and on...
It will be fun to watch.


5 posted on 05/12/2006 6:56:36 PM PDT by Galtoid ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zaxxon

"Been a lot of leakin goin on" by the prosecutor, to boot.


6 posted on 05/12/2006 7:00:17 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
I don't know who will be sued, but.........

---------------------------------------------

You can't squeeze blood out of a turnip.

I grew up in a place where we knew not to mess around with the girls on the other side of the tracks. Maybe those young fellows got an education.

7 posted on 05/12/2006 7:01:56 PM PDT by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
I don't know who will be sued, but I think this is going to be a major deal concerning the parents of every Duke Lacrosse team member. Defamation, false accusation, police misconduct, false arrest, and on and on... It will be fun to watch.

What police misconduct? The police did nothing wrong.

8 posted on 05/12/2006 7:03:33 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zaxxon

just saw the presentation from one of the defense attorneys:

she had sex with SOMEONE ELSE, not on the lacrosse team?


9 posted on 05/12/2006 7:07:31 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Greta discussing this now!


10 posted on 05/12/2006 7:09:03 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

who conducted the "lineup" where she was shown only photos of lacrosse players - and told "pick out who it was"?

that's not the way you operate a fair lineup, by including only persons from the pool of possible perps.


11 posted on 05/12/2006 7:09:33 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StarFan

this case is over, by any reasonable standard.

but who knows with Nifong.


12 posted on 05/12/2006 7:10:23 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: winston2
If the DNA doesn't match - you must acquit!

No, it's:

If the DNA and the timeline do not fit, you must acquit!

13 posted on 05/12/2006 7:10:46 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zaxxon
The "single male source" who matched the genetic material found on the vaginal swab taken from the victim ... "is known to the Durham police department," Cheshire said. He declined to give the man's name or comment on his relationship with the accuser.

"There is no indication that this man should have his name dragged through the mud," he said.

Someone prominent, perhaps?

14 posted on 05/12/2006 7:13:18 PM PDT by KittyKares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy

Precisely.

I knew he had nothing from the second DNA test when he arrested the cab driver.


15 posted on 05/12/2006 7:17:48 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: digger48
"Been a lot of leakin goin on" by the prosecutor, to boot.

Yep; he's had this report at least two days and his office leaked it to the press, but couldn't find time to fax it to the defense team until 5:20 p.m. today.

16 posted on 05/12/2006 7:18:46 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

The lineup; harassing witnesses with arrests for things people didn't do. Going to the dorm to talk to the players when they knew they had attorneys.

Lots of stuff.


17 posted on 05/12/2006 7:19:46 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

She sure did.

The only semen was NOT theirs.


18 posted on 05/12/2006 7:20:17 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
who conducted the "lineup" where she was shown only photos of lacrosse players - and told "pick out who it was"? That's not the way you operate a fair lineup, by including only persons from the pool of possible perps.

The cops were told to do it that way even after the cops told the DA that it was improper. IOW, the cops were POd at the DA and intentionally let Nifong screw it up.

The cops knew the kids were innocent and the screwup on the line-up made the ID of the two players inadmissable. The cops helped to prevent the prosecution of the players.

Believe me, I have no great love for most cops; but in this case, the cops did nothing wrong. Nifong ran all aspects of the investigation, and the cops let him screw it up by himself.

19 posted on 05/12/2006 7:21:16 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

OK, fair enough.

I heard the details of that lineup process, and was stunned.


20 posted on 05/12/2006 7:22:17 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson