Posted on 08/19/2022 4:50:40 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Lawyers representing America’s service members are beginning to produce victories defending the U.S. Armed Forces against forced compliance with biomedical gene therapy experiments, and suddenly, nobody in the Pentagon wants to take accountability for their legally dubious mRNA injection order.
It all began on August 24, 2021, when Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a memo mandating mRNA “vaccination” for the active military, but with the stipulation that this mandate only applied to fully licensed products. This was because, as The Dossier understands, it is illegal to force service members to take an EUA vaccine.
The Sec Austin memo and the guidance that followed created an issue, because, as The Dossier readers are well aware of by now, the FDA licensed versions of the mRNA shots never actually made it to market, rendering the initial vaccine mandate useless.
This is where the infamous September 14, 2021 memo comes into play.
Dr Terry Adirim, the woman who signed the memo, is a devoted democrat political activist and, as a medical doctor, advocates for “gender-affirming prescriptions” for “transgender” children. At the time, she was the acting assistant secretary of defense for health affairs (under a Biden political appointment). Adirim’s memo attempted to justify mandating EUA shots as if they were FDA approved.
Dr Adirim’s deceptive memo described the EUA and FDA licensed vaccines as “interchangeable,” adding that the Defense Department can “use doses distributed under the EUA to administer the vaccination series as if the doses were the licensed vaccine.” Adirim failed to note that the EUA vaccines were only administratively interchangeable, but not *legally* interchangeable, as made clear by the FDA. This should have rendered any mandate unenforceable.
In other documents and statements, she routinely made claims that FDA licensed vaccines were available to troops, when that was not in fact the case.
Following the mRNA injection order, untold thousands of service members were coerced — under threat of both administrative and criminal action — to take a “vaccine” that they wanted no part of. Unsurprisingly, this mandatory novel gene therapy injection has harmed combat readiness and produced widespread, serious, long term injuries throughout the armed forces.
The Pentagon’s unlawful order is being challenged in court by lawyers representing all branches of the military. On Thursday, the Marine Corps became the latest service branch granted a class wide injunction against the mandate.
Since leaving the Pentagon, Adirim has sought to distance herself from the letter, claiming that “crazy” attempts to hold her accountable are misguided, because it was “The Secretary” (Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin) who “directed vaccinations.” Neither Austin nor the Pentagon has confirmed that the Secretary of Defense ordered Adirim to sign off on the unlawful mandate.
Adirim remains in government as the program executive director of the VA’s Electronic Health Record Modernization Integration Office. As a government official, both she and the Secretary of Defense are easily accessible to testify via a congressional subpoena, should congress want to investigate their controversial memos. As Adirim’s memo has come under scrutiny, she has decided to lock her social media accounts.
Who, if anyone, will be held accountable?
Wearing a mask to hide his/her face ?
Of course...
But, who could have known?(/S)
If the two products are LEGALLY distinct, I do not see how the government can mandate use of both of them. I always knew that there was corruption among elected officials but I never thought that there would be actual EVIL perpetrated against citizens.
I was on active duty and forced to get it as well. I took the J&J, but I said I don’t want any of them. And they also lied and said teh cominarty shot is the mRNA shot they are providing to troops.
100% lies. I can’t wait for my lawsuit.
I hope you win it. God bless you.
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
Seems to me we're in violation.
Austin is a mental midget, much like Gen. Milley.
Those totally predictable perfumed princes. Priceless. I’ll bet all those REMFs want to fight to the last Ukrainian too.
Smoke these
‘Mandating Mothers!’
Nuremberg is waiting for these bastards. Hang ‘em high! The trials need to go on for decades to tell any aspiring would be pyschopaths - never again!
If they lie and the studies were bogus (which that will come out too), then you should make out well. Although it will probably take 5 to 10 years to sort it all out.
Look for a pro bono attorney, and tell them what you are looking for minimum after taxes (time you would have stayed in the military, pain, suffering, unnecessary stress, etc)
Did you see him speak in front of congress. He didn’t say much and Milley had to do all the talking.
Honorable? Not bloody likely.
They can run, but they cannot hide.
Me too for-Q, good luck.
I might have seen some clips.
So, I revise my remark.
“Austin is a mental midget, much smaller than mental midget Gen. Milley.”
Calling him a metal midget is generous, I would say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.