Posted on 06/12/2022 10:15:01 AM PDT by daniel1212
Moreover, consistent with liberal prohibitions against terms considered abusive, fostering hate, etc., then the Left is guilty of the same with its denigration of all based upon their (conservative) religion (a term now so broad as to include the officially “resolutely non-theistic” Satanic Temple). But of course, the often ambiguity of terms leaves them very open to and subjective interpretation
For instance, https://www.verizon.com/about/terms-conditions/terms-of-use for using Verizon’s websites states in its Terms of Use that,
If the use of a Site or Resource by you or anyone using your account, in Verizon's sole discretion, violates these Terms or any other Verizon agreement or policy, is objectionable or unlawful.. then... Verizon may suspend, deny or restrict your access to any Site or Resource...
you agree not to use the Sites (including by linking to the Sites), or any Resources, in any manner that:
is threatening, harassing, abusive, defamatory, slanderous, fraudulent... racially, ethnically or otherwise offensive, hateful or abusive;
You can’t not like something with these idiots calling you names
I’m not homophobic, I am homonauseous. I am sick of hearing about gay pride and the like.
The aforementioned book, After The Ball How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred Of Gays In The 90s, is widely regarded as the handbook for the homosexual agenda, in which two homosexual Harvard-trained graduates, [60] Marshall Kirk (1957–2005), a researcher in neuropsychiatry, and Hunter Madsen (pen name Erastes Pill), who was schooled in social marketing, advocated avoiding portraying homosexuals as aggressive challengers, but as "victims" instead, while making all those who opposed them to be "evil persecutors". As a means of the latter, they used jamming, in which Christians, traditionalists, or anyone else who opposes the gay agenda are publicly smeared. Their strategy was based on the premise that, "In any campaign to win over the public, Gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to adopt the role of protector. The purpose of victim imagery is to make straight people feel very uncomfortable."[61][62] Leftists also label Christians who support biblical marriage as "anti-gay," equating them with non-western Muslims who support stoning homosexuals.[63]
"Jamming" homo-hatred (disagreement with homosexual behaviors) was to be done by linking it to Nazi horror, advised Kirk and Madsen. Associate all who oppose homosexuality with images of Klansmen demanding that gays be slaughtered, hysterical backwoods preachers, menacing punks, and a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed. Thus, "propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths..."[64] " It can show them being criticized, hated, shunned. It can depict gays experiencing horrific suffering as the direct result of homohatred-suffering of which even most bigots would be ashamed to be the cause. It can, in short, link homohating bigotry with all sorts of attributes the bigot would be ashamed to possess, and with social consequences he would find unpleasant and scary... our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof."[65]
Kirk and Madsen's open admission of their deceptive tactics is noted as most revealing: [O]ur effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof. "...the person's beliefs can be altered whether he is conscious of the attack or not"[67] “The campaign we outline in this book, though complex, depends centrally upon a program of unabashed propaganda, firmly grounded in long-established principles of psychology and advertising.”[68][69]
Similarly, author Robert Bauman additionally records: "It makes no difference that the ads are lies... because were using them to ethically good effect, to counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies, and far more wicked ones."[70]
The need for Kirk and Madsen to engage in such manipulation may be seen as being due to their sober realization of the deleterious nature of the homosexual lifestyle. This includes sodomy being responsible for 81% of new HIV cases aged 13 and older among men - despite only representing approximately 4% of the male population - and 92% of new HIV among youth (2020), and (historically) a greatly increased incidence of other infectious diseases and premature death, and despite decades of attempting to subdue homoerotic practices into being "safe." [71]
“In short, the gay lifestyle - if such a chaos can, after all, legitimately be called a lifestyle - it just doesn’t work: it doesn’t serve the two functions for which all social framework evolve: to constrain people’s natural impulses to behave badly and to meet their natural needs. While it’s impossible to provide an exhaustive analytic list of all the root causes and aggravants of this failure, we can asseverate at least some of the major causes. Many have been dissected, above, as elements of the Ten Misbehaviors; it only remains to discuss the failure of the gay community to provide a viable alternative to the heterosexual family.”[72]
David Kupelian, author of The Marketing of Evil, describes Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, stating,
Kirk and Madsen were not the kind of drooling activists that would burst into churches and throw condoms in the air. They were smart guys – very smart. Kirk, a Harvard-educated researcher in neuropsychiatry, worked with the Johns Hopkins Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth and designed aptitude tests for adults with 200+ IQs. Madsen, with a doctorate in politics from Harvard, was an expert on public persuasion tactics and social marketing.[73]
Marshall Kirk died in 2005 at the young age of 47.[74] The cause of death has not been publicly revealed.
Often cited as an early example of such tactics was the role of homosexual activists in persuading the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM-II). Dr. Ronald Bayer, though being himself a pro-homosexual psychiatrist, described this removal as being the result of power politics, threats, and intimidation, rather than any new scientific discoveries.[75] In so doing, like slavery before it, the homosexual agenda is seen to threaten basic freedoms, principally the First Amendment.[76]
The charge of "homophobia" has been increasingly evidenced as being part of a means of intimidation used in pushing the Homosexual Agenda. Due to what homophobia has been made to denote, that of being a repressed homosexual, or possessing an irrational fear of being approached by homosexuals, or of being a "bigot" "persecuting" victims, the widespread use of the term "homophobic" attaches a powerful stigma to anyone who may even conscientiously oppose the practice of homosexuality, thus silencing many who might otherwise object to it.[77]
Maybe they should be hellphobic?
NOT skerred of them. Not agreeing with their choice doesn’t mean hating or fearing.
Because its immoral.
Obviously its not the only form of immorality, but its immoral.
Besides immoral, it reflects a damaged psyche.
It’s the disgust reflex and it is a natural.
The fact these degenerates want to call gay behavior SEEM “natural” while making the natural disgust reflex against homosexual behavior verboten.
PURE SATANIC INVERSION!
i’m not phobic of faggots, I just find them gross
I thought a phobia was a fear. Very interesting to me that if you disagree with something that they believe it becomes a phobia not a disagreement.
You win the Internet today.
Speaking from a biological perspective, isn’t there something wrong with same-sex sex? Dogs, cats, horses and rabbits can figure it out, but HUMANS need to have sexual intercourse with the same sex? Isn’t that INCREDIBLY STUPID?!
Apart from wicked, which is a moral judgment, same-sex sex is like a guy a cop told me about who liked to jerk off in public using a Nike shoe - always Nike! Seems “Just Do It” appealed to him...but what he was doing was SAFER than what homosexuals do!
Yet there is still room at the cross for all who will come to God in repentance and faith, and trust in the Divine Son of God sent by the Father, the risen Lord Jesus, to save them on His account, by His sinless shed blood, and thus be baptized and live for Him. (Acts 10:36-47) Thanks be to God.
Genesis 19:27-28
King James Version
27 And Abraham gat up early in the morning to the place where he stood before the Lord:
28 And he looked toward Sodom and Gomorrah, and toward all the land of the plain, and beheld, and, lo, the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2019%3A27-28&version=KJV
I think that my fear of what their perversions are doing to our culture is rational. Not a phobia at all. They simply do wickedness. Hoping they don’t do it in your face has been a colossal failure.
Thus the perversion of the word is exposed.
" Maybe they should be hellphobic?"
If only they were, as the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.
Good one.
Indeed, as in quest for power via deception of man, the devil works to pervert all that God ordained,
The Big Picture: who is really running the show in the culture war, and its nature and trajectory
Just mention that homosexuality is nature’s way of ending a defective genetic line. Nature wants to reproduce to continue the genetic continuance of a species. That lifestyle in general halts the passing of a genetic line. You know, science.
That should get them thinking or cause a meltdown.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.