Posted on 03/07/2021 11:59:19 AM PST by Lenora Thompson
Legendary comedian Will Rogers often said, "All I know is what I read in the papers." Well, all I know is what I read on Twitter.
Things have come to a pretty pass when we have to rely on Twitter to kinda' sorta' dope out whether the United States Military considers Whoever-is-Posing-as-Joe-Biden to be their Commander-in-Chief...or not.
That's a pickle no military and no nation should ever find themselves in.
Six days after the events of January 6th, a document supposedly signed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff circulated on social media stating they considered Biden to be the lawful President-elect and next Commander-in-Chief.
But it was undated and signed in blue ink. That's why vets on Twitter instantly cried, "B$!"
Nevertheless, the Pentagon began briefing the incoming Biden Administration on national security matters. They even planted a couple of whoppers, just to test Biden. Sure enough, the data was leaked to China within 30 minutes of the briefing. Well! That was the end of Biden's Pentagon briefings!
To add insult to injury, the whole world witnessed the National Guard casually turn their backs to Joe's Fake Inaugural procession as well as the wrong 21-gun salute and lack of proper garb during the Fake Inauguration Charade. Without the military uttering a word, their message came through loud and clear: Not our true Commander-in-Chief.
But according to a recent article from Real Raw News, some of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were loyal to Biden and did consider him to be their real Commander-in-Chief...until last week when he nonchalantly asked for an increase of US military in the Middle East merely to protect the Rumaila oil field.
"When Chief of Staff of the Army General James C. McConville asked Biden why he looked to unnecessarily endanger American lives," wrote Michael Baxter for Real Raw News, "and why he cared about the oil, Biden purportedly told him to 'follow orders, and mind your own business.' "
Baxter goes on to write, "Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Michael Gilday, who opposed Biden’s Feb 26 unprovoked air strike on Syria, asked how many soldiers Biden needed to guard the oil reserve. In response, Biden reportedly shrugged his shoulders and tossed out a random number—50,000."
Fifty thousand!?!
"The figure shocked not only many of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but also Donald Trump when Gen. Berger relayed the meeting details to him," Baxter writes. "Gen. Berger told Trump an argument broke out...Berger, McConville, and Gilday said they stand with Trump and said they would submit resignation letters before sending their men back overseas without a valid reason."
Oh, but it gets even worse.
Baxter goes on to say, "Biden considered firing those who supported Trump, but changed his mind for fear of political fallout, as firing one, two, or three, meant firing all, and he instead reprimanded them with warning: ‘Ultimately, you’re all replaceable, just not at this moment.' ”
All of this news, if true, is trending in the right direction. To me it indicates that, whatever commanders / branches of our armed forces may have been leaning towards Biden will be much more open to considering the mountains of evidence of voter fraud.
But in the absence of any direct, concrete information, I've spent hours painstakingly combing through all of the U. S. military's blue-checkmarked Twitter accounts, trying to dope out where their allegiance lies, using this set of criteria.
Did they acknowledge Joe Biden on February 15th, President's Day?
Do they follow @POTUS?
Do they follow @whitehouse?
Do they follow @joebiden?
Do they follow @FLOTUS?
Did/do they follow the archived account @whitehouse45?
Did/do they follow the archived account @potus45?
Did/do they follow the archived account @flotus45?
According to The Verge, @PresElectBiden was changed to @POTUS while all of President Trump's tweets sent under @POTUS from 2017-2020 were archived under @POTUS45.
This means that to follow Mr. Biden, Mrs. Biden and their White House, the Social Media Managers for the Military would've had to make a conscious choice to actively do so. The follows did not rollover in Twitter.
That's why I find it so telling that many of them do not follow the new Administration, as you can see from the spreadsheet below.
But they did and still are following the (now archived) account for President and Mrs. Trump and their White House. That was their pattern...follow WH, POTUS and FLOTUS...a pattern they broke for Biden.
Whew! I hope that all made sense!
@potus45 (archived Trump): 33.2 million followers
@potus (active Biden): 8.6 million followers
{spreadsheet screenshots}
Even more encouraging is that 100% of our Armed Forces either ignored President's Day altogether on Twitter or acknowledged the holiday in a generic way, focusing on Washington and Lincoln. Not one of them...not one!!!... mentioned Biden by name nor tagged @POTUS in any of their President's Day tweets. That includes the Secret Service!
Personally, I find that mighty encouraging. Remember how President Trump was swarmed with love on February 15th!?! Biden must've been gnashing his porcelain veneers that day!
Here are the only military tweets that acknowledged February 15th as President's Day at all. Some of the Military's Twitter accounts simply went silent for that entire day.
{slideshow}
Yes, ever civilian avenue for righting the wrong of November 3rd must be exhausted.
Yes, the military must conduct their own investigation and make their own decision, yea or nay, on outside interference in our election.
But judging exclusively by Twitter, I have high hopes our military will do the honorable and just thing for our Republic and bring back our beloved and very-much-missed President Trump!
“The news is so much more fun when you can just make it up.”
The only thing she cares about is hits to her site.
$$$
She uses stupid Qtards for that. They’ll believe ANYTHING.
The only thing that matters to most military personnel is 20 years.
***********
The military has become just another self-serving, politically correct, bureaucracy.
LOL. Haven’t heard that one yet.
The national guard that are in DC have been thoroughly vetted by the professional lifelong elites to ensure they would shoot us.
***************
Would they shoot us, even if unarmed? I have no doubt that they would.
You a low information idiot that knows nothing.
What possesses you to post this kind of CRAP.
Bidanne fears the military, that’s why he’s trying to get them out of the country on fake missions.
It's extremely unfair to paint servicemembers that way.
I did 8+ years on active duty, only rarely thought about doing 20. I had a couple of efficiency reports that did me in, anyway. That was back in the 80s, before Desert Storm and the endless tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Back then, about 60% of Captains made it to Major. Nowadays, it's around 85-90%, and I don't begrudge them.
The Army was very good to me: paid my way through college, allowed me to serve in Germany for 4+ years in a unique assignment, air base defense (my battalion was deactivated in the mid-90s. Also met my wife at Fort Bliss. Was talking with an old classmate a few months back, we both felt that the most important things we did in our careers occurred during our time on active duty.
It's not like the rest of my life was unimportant, it just didn't compare to the responsibilities we took on, and the people we served with.
People that have never worn the uniform do not know what they're talking about.
When the policy was America first they fought it tooth and nail. The joint chiefs got in bed with communist to get rid of Trump for their globalist masters. They are corrupt politicians not warriors. We will take an ass kicking if China attacks in the pacific of December 7th proportions because of these joint chiefs. It’s a shame real GI’s have to serve under these sellouts and for the blood and treasure they will have to pay for the joint chiefs, the deep state and BiteMe’s incompetence.
This is all BS. The military is not answering to Biden. He’s not firing anybody. He’s not getting briefings. The bombings in Syria were on CIA black ops sites and a couple factories where they were making stuff they should not have been making. Biden had zero to do with it.
Biden isn’t the CIC to me, but I suppose most in the military are forced to see Traitor Joe as Commander in Cheap.
February 15th was not “President’s Day.” It was George Washington’s Birthday. There was a national holiday in honor of Washington’s birthday before Congress moved most national holidays to Mondays. President Nixon referred to the new Monday holiday as “Presidents’ Day” (probably thinking it was intended to honor both Washington and Lincoln, but there had never been a national holiday in honor of Lincoln). Unfortunately that caught on.
Not exactly, he just called back an aircraft carrier from the Persian Gulf region.
I don't think Biden has a clue about anything, and his handlers don't have a clue about the military.
The administration probably doesn't trust the military and would do a “defund the police” type action if they could figure out a way to get away with it.
In the meantime, Biden will appoint loyal liberal-minded military officers who are willing to do the cancel culture ideology, as Obama did for so many years.
Have active duty started an insurrection yet?
Do yous realize the top COC love trannies because they are told to love them as well as members who fail at basic PT protocols.
You are the one with low information issues buddy.
I was simply in the military environment from the day I was born through my current occupation.
If you can’t see what is going on I feel sorry for your ignorance.
Wife was active duty (Who counted the years) for me was a GS. To say it's noble is fooling yourself in the face of again, politicians who use the service as a bargaining point.
There will never be a insurrection or Constitutional allegiance, that does not supply the paychecks. Embrace reality please and what Eisenhower warned against (Which politicians and contractors are running with).
Why have we been at war since "forever"?
I know my Army Reserve brother said he would NOT obey unconstitutional orders, like anything having to do with guns.
Outstanding reply sir! I too served my 20 for the good of the service, not a paycheck. It was instilled in me by my father, who also spent 20 years serving..and believe me, when he was in, the pay was abysmal. I was given the opportunity to continue after I retired as a physicist, so I accepted because the work was so important. I could make twice my pay on the outside, but the will to serve is stronger. I tell everyone who asks, that I have been in the Air Force for 56 years...I don’t plan on stopping any time soon.
Excellent post. Well stated.
Has anything she said been even remotely correct to date? Nope.
Show a link.
Put up or shut up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.