https://www.nj.com/news/2009/08/north_bergen_blogger_accused_o.html
https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-turner-65
Yeah, this guy:
You might want to get better "sources."
Posted on 12/18/2020 5:15:11 PM PST by Lenora Thompson
You hear some awfully funny things online. On Monday, we heard a benediction pronounced after the Michigan Electors committed treason. Later, while Texas was casting their Electoral Votes, we heard mention of Chief Justice Roberts screaming at his fellow SCOTUS judges.
No! Say it cannot be! Judges are above politics. Irreproachable. Job security for life. Independent.
Or are they!? The source of the intel is an unnamed clerk in the Supreme Court of the United States who heard-what-he-heard last Friday when the Justices retired to deliberate on whether or not to take Texas' case against the embattled states so obviously riddled with election fraud.
Usually deliberations are quiet and professional, sometimes conducted telephonically. But given the gravity of the situation, the Justices chose to deliberate face-to-face on Friday.
Fireworks ensued!
Chief Justice John Roberts could be plainly heard from the down the hall screaming, "Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?"
Now, like you, I labor under the delusion that, like the blindfolded statuary of Lady Justice that Trey Gowdy is so fond of talking about, our SCOTUS justices are also blind. We expect them to apolitical.We depend on them ruling upon law alone regardless of the headlines, current events or personal cost to themselves, their families or even the nation.
Well, it's a nice theory anyways. Sometimes it actually works that way.
Roberts was also overheard to say, "Don’t tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren’t dealing with riots then...You are forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don’t want to hear from the two junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote.”
Odd language from a man who was involved with the Bush/Gore thing himself in 2000 as were Kavanaugh and Barrett. At least we know Barrett and Kavanaugh tried.
Justice Clarence Thomas responded to Justice Roberts' scream by calmly saying, "This will end be the end of democracy, John."
Conspicuous by its absence is anything you'd expect a Justice to have good reason to scream about, like, oh I dunno: THE CONSTITUTION.
There's been a rumor afoot for a very long time that I've never wanted to think about, let alone research, and I still don't. But Justice Roberts' alleged outburst on Friday makes it necessary. My friend "Gen Z Conservative" has done an excellent job researching this rumor for his article Is It True that Chief Justice John Roberts Visited Epstein’s Island?
Here's what he had to say:
"...what we do know is that Epstein brought famous and influential individuals to his island and had ample evidence with which he could blackmail them. One of those individuals might have been Chief Justice Roberts; it does look like Justice John Roberts visited Epstein’s island and could have been blackmailed to make bad SCOTUS decisions.
To determine who visited “pedo island,” one key piece of evidence has been the flight log. For example, a flight log from 2009 showed that Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey and Naomi Campbell visited the island. You might remember that Kevin Spacey was accused of harassing a minor and there is ample evidence that Clinton and Prince Andrew also had inappropriate relations with minors."
Now, one interesting name on that list is a John Roberts. Here is what Lin Wood had to say about the idea that John Roberts visited Epstein’s island and was on the flight manifest:
"A 'John Roberts' flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet on at least two occasions."
The fact that Lin Wood put his personal and professional reputation on the line with this daring tweet tells me there's fire, not merely smoke.
The timing of his tweet is fascinating too: June 29th, 2020.
Justice Roberts had been hospitalized on June 21st for a injury to his head that left him covered in blood.
Cause? Well, first they went all seizure about it because he supposedly suffered a seizure in 1993 and again in 2007, but then they blamed it on that oldie-but-goodie catch-all excuse: dehydration. Uh-huh. It's interesting to note that the accident came, according to Yahoo! Money, "eight days before [Roberts] sided with liberal justices to strike down a Louisiana law restricting who can perform abortions. The chief justice has sided with liberals on a slew of rulings recently."
A lot of people are beginning to seriously wonder if Roberts is compromised. What if he was on Pedo, I mean, Epstein Island? There is a photograph that seems to confirm that the "John Roberts" in the flight log may actually be John Roberts the judge.
If so, is he being blackmailed? Since 2013, rumors that something was "off" about the adoption of Roberts' two Irish children have led to suspicions of blackmail. Then the Epstein thing came along.
I also wonder if his head wound may've been from being physically attacked? (Think Mitch McConnell!)
He could be blackmailed. He might've been biffed. But what about bribes?
Copious Mel (@LtlM55) on Twitter has tracked his net worth going up, up, up. Her data comes from OpenSecrets.org which I checked fastidiously. I verified we are indeed talking about THAT John G. Roberts. And yes, his personal finances did increase precipitously, rather like ballots for Joe Biden in the wee hours of 11/4.
That's mighty fine kale for a man who makes $277,700 per year with a raise of only $2,000-3,000 each year. And no, the wife's income can't explain it either.
L. Lin Wood said it best in his tweets yesterday: "We The People are entitled to answers. You work for us, Justice Roberts."
Is the Pope a Communist?
Yes. Totally.
John Roberts on the plane has been debunked by me..and even more digging by another poster.
FIrst, he was having oral arguments on one of the days.
Secondly,
John Roberts is associated with the people who own the plane. I think Vice President.
Was Liberace gay?
our courts must do their function and they are not....
when you have 2 out of the 3 branches of govt NOT DOING THEIR JOB its the end of our republic...
I hope Trump can work his magic...
Does Bill Clinton have syphilis?
Lol no. He’s just being exactly who he is. Back in the 90s he did pro bono work for the first big homo lawsuit that came from Colorado. He’s an East coast Ivy establishment globalist azzwipe. He enjoys the DC social scene.
No coercion needed.
The Supreme Court issued a denial that said there was no such meeting at all.
THAT ALL SUCH MEETINGS ARE DONE BY TELECONFERENCING.
That’s so easy to check that I conclude people like you who claim otherwise, without evidence, are lying.
Good luck, but no thanks for now.
You’d have to actually support the country first THEN be turned against it to be compromised.
He’s not compromised - he’s a moron.
That's an out and out lie and I've already proved it........
Is the Pope Catholic?
ummmmmmmm...Wait a minute. Not sure if that one works anymore
At least Liberace loved this country, and was a friend of the Reagans.
https://www.nj.com/news/2009/08/north_bergen_blogger_accused_o.html
https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-turner-65
Yeah, this guy:
You might want to get better "sources."
this did not happen, total BS made up stuff.
Why do we keep posting fake stuff about this? Does it make people feel better?
If it’s proven that Roberts and Breyer have conspired to take out Trump, who has authority to remove, discipline, prosecute, etc., them? Aren’t they themselves the top of the heap (steaming pile)?
I will never remember your name to give you credit so you will have to pipe up...but you got the goods
is grass green? Do cows moo?
Of course he's compromised.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.