Not given in this data source, but i read on a reddit sub that, underlying this, a vast majority of deaths were people with critical conditions.
As if mostly, the dead are people who were already likely to die at their next infection.
Suggestion is most of these would be dead if the got the flu, or a severe cold, or any othe number of illness.
0-29 years 1
30-39 years 18
40-49 years 76
50-59 years 314
60-69 years 971
70-79 years 2,967
80-89 years 3,344
90 years and older 767
Gender, ethnic background, blood type ?
Just curious
Pandemic statistics in the politically correct era. Why are not the race, underlying medical conditions, habits, medications taken being released? No doubt elderly people are very susceptible to develop serious disease or die from this novel coronavirus. But just who are the people under 60 that are becoming seriously ill and dying from this virus. As usual the devil is in the details. Definitely would not fit the political narrative if the young people who become seriously ill of die turn out to be Asian, AIDS patients, marijuana smokers, drug users, alcoholics etc. The CDC and WHO are being very circumspect on how known data is tabulated and released.
For a single-payer medical system, the virus epidemic may be just the thing to lighten the medical load on the system by eliminating those who have the most demand. This is one element of single-payer that I am most against.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic#Epidemiology
Italy
Cases 92,472
Deaths 10,023
Recoveries 12,384
The numbers would be more meaningful if presented in proportion to the total number of people in each arbitrarily chosen age group.