Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Fake News is Flying Over the Senate Impeachment Trial
DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

Posted on 01/14/2020 4:44:30 AM PST by EyesOfTX

BS was the Deep State’s choice to run with the Monday narrative-setting piece. – The Democrat/Media/Deep State pressure campaign on several GOP senator related to the upcoming Senate trial of President Donald Trump continued to mount on Monday. CBS News became the chosen vessel to run with yet another story based on an anonymous “source” designed to pressure not only the Usual Suspects among the Republican caucus, but also to add to their numbers.

From the CBS fake report:

Washington — The White House is preparing for some Republican senators to join Democrats in voting to call witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial, which could get underway in the coming days.

Senior White House officials tell CBS News they increasingly believe that at least four Republicans, and likely more, will vote to call witnesses. In addition to Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah and possibly Cory Gardner of Colorado, the White House also views Rand Paul of Kentucky as a “wild card” and Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee as an “institutionalist” who might vote to call witnesses, as one official put it.

Last week, Collins said she was working with a “fairly small group” of GOP senators to allow new testimony, adding that her colleagues “should be completely open to calling witnesses.” Romney has expressed an interest in hearing from former national security adviser John Bolton, who has said he would testify under subpoena. Murkowski said last week that the Senate should proceed as it did during the 1999 Clinton impeachment trial.

Note the story leads by naming the Usual Suspects who everyone knows are the most likely RINOs to go off the rails on any issue: Mitt Romney, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, the three who can most often be relied upon to go squishy whenever the going gets tough. But the media knows that they need to pressure at least one more Republican squish to side with their Democrat buddies in order to get anything done, so now they are moving to add to the list. In fact, they may even need more than four GOP traitors, since Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Doug Jones of Alabama would both pay dearly back at home for supporting this impeachment scam.

So, first Republican name up? Cory Gardner of Colorado, who is facing a tough re-election campaign against former Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper. Oh, hey, and it’s purely a coincidence that, on the day on which this unsourced CBS story is published, Gardner suddenly gets attacked by a group led by Kellyanne Conway’s piggish husband George:

A group run by anti-Trump conservatives has released an advertisement targeting one of the most vulnerable Republican senators, Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner.

Gardner, 45, has one of the toughest reelection campaigns in the nation as the centrist Republican attempts to maintain his seat with President Trump on the ballot next to him. Trump lost Colorado in 2016 by 4.9%, and the Cook Political Report listed Gardner’s seat as a toss-up.

The Lincoln Project, a group led by George Conway, the husband of Trump’s counselor Kellyanne Conway, Steve Schmidt, John Weaver, and Rick Wilson, targeted Gardner for siding with Trump on several issues. The advertisement opens with the question, “Why are you losing?” and proceeds to blame Gardner’s tight reelection race on his relationship with Trump.

Now, Conway’s group doesn’t have much of a budget to pay for running the ad, but boy is it getting tons of free play in the corrupt news media. Funny how that happens.

Next up on the list of potential GOP turncoats is Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who we just saw last week tossing a hissy fit with his libertarian buddy, Utah Senator Mike Lee, coming out a White House briefing on the situation with Iran. Oddly, the CBS article does not mention Sen. Lee as another potential Democrat ally. Frankly, I think he’s more likely to go rogue than Sen. Paul.

Finally, CBS goes after Lamar Alexander of Tennessee because he’s supposedly an “institutionalist,” whatever that means in the demented minds of corrupt reporters and editors. Honestly, that’s probably because the corrupt media always goes after Sen. Alexander in situations like this. They did the same thing during the Democrat fiasco over the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, and failed. I honestly don’t see Sen. Alexander as a problem here.

And think about this where Alexander the “institutionalist” is concerned: No one in the history of the U.S. Senate was more of an “institutionalist” than the current Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell. Funny, we don’t see any corrupt media articles speculating about Cocaine Mitch, do we?

So, at the end of the day, what we have here is yet another narrative-setting piece for the Deep State. It’s a fake report based on zero named “sources,” and most likely no real source with any knowledge of the situation at all. The only “facts” on which it is based are a couple of off-hand comments made by Collins and Murkowski to local reporters in their home states. The one statement – by Collins – that is recounted by CBS could mean nothing more than that she ran into Senators Murkowski and Paul in the Hallway of Hart Senate Office Building and chatted with them for a couple of minutes about whether or not they wanted to hear testimony from Hunter Biden about the various illegitimate children he has fathered in several different states.

Here is what we do know:

Mitch McConnell completely rolled Nancy Pelosi in the political gamesmanship leading up to this trial; Lacking any leverage whatsoever, Pelosi will transmit the articles of impeachment over to the Senate in the coming days; McConnell has the 51 votes he needs to proceed with the trial using the same Senate rules that were employed during the trial of Bill Clinton; Pelosi’s house managers – most likely Adam Schiff and Jabba the Nadler, which will be a hoot – will present the Democrats’ sham case; After that part of the trial has been completed, then and only then will there potentially be a vote to call witnesses who did not testify during the House’s Soviet-style hearings; Nobody – not CBS, the senators or anyone else – knows how any of these Republican senators will vote when that time comes. So, get used to this kind of sham story from the corrupt media. With the Senate trial set to begin early next week, the pressure campaign on these and possibly additional GOP senators will only continue to mount. It’s going to be like the Kavanaugh fiasco all over again: The hit pieces will only become increasingly shrill as the Democrats become increasingly desperate as they see their impeachment scam failing to change minds.

Yes, it’s all despicable. Yes, it’s demented, and depraved, and disgusting. But hey, this is Democrats and their corrupt media toadies we’re talking about here – you expected something else?

That is all.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Humor; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 2020election; abortion; alabama; alaska; botox; brettkavanaugh; california; cbs; colorado; corygardner; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; dougjones; election2020; fakenews; georgeconway; hunterbiden; joemanchin; johnweaver; kellyanneconway; kentucky; lamaralexander; lincolnproject; lisamurkowski; maga; maine; mediabias; mediawingofthednc; mikelee; mitchmcconnell; nancypelosi; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; randpaul; rickwilson; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; scotus; smearmachine; steveschmidt; susancollins; tennessee; trump; trumpwinsagain; utah; westvirginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: HombreSecreto
Yep. Load up the witness list with all kinds of “poison pills.”

Agree 100%

I forgot to add Paul Pelosi to my list. I believe he is deeply involved in Ukraine corruption. He would be the "poison pill" that would force the dems to vote against calling witnesses.

21 posted on 01/14/2020 6:16:05 AM PST by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

I would love them to pass a resolution where all the rules the Democrats used in the House were EXACTLY the same, with only the parties and names changed to being the Republicans being in charge of it, and they got to refuse any witnesses the Dems wanted and watch them howl because they can’t claim it was unfair otherwise, the entire impeachment fiasco is showed to be.


22 posted on 01/14/2020 6:43:24 AM PST by spacewarp (FreeRepublic, Rush's show prep since foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FtrPilot
Hopefully, Sen McConnell allows only one vote on a list of additional witnesses. So, if Mitt Romney wants John Bolton,
he has to vote to allow Trump to call witnessse he chooses: the Bidens, the whistleblower, ICIG, Schiff, Schiff's staff, etc.

Nice play.......it's reassuring to know Mitch is the master of loading up measures with poison pills.

23 posted on 01/14/2020 6:43:56 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

By my count, Romney (who wants to hear from Bolton), Murkowski, Collins, Alexander and Portman have already stated their opposition to dismissal. I fully expect Romney’s pet poodle Mike Lee to insist on his fungible definition of “fairness” and he’ll be joined by Roy Blunt, which tilts the scales on the vote for witnesses to 54 for the Democrats/GOP surrender monkeys. Add the fact that John Roberts is presiding over the “trial”, throw in a SECRET VOTE and what happens...?


24 posted on 01/14/2020 6:57:05 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Jim Noble

And just what do you think John Bolton is going to say?


26 posted on 01/14/2020 7:37:26 AM PST by griswold3 (Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Did Democrats during the House hearings allow Republicans to call witnesses?


27 posted on 01/14/2020 11:28:56 AM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson