Posted on 01/20/2019 12:02:06 PM PST by Based Newsman
You can always count on Donny to say something vile and stupid... No thanks.
...And Donny Douche will die on the first day of the next Civil War.
It is way past the first day.
He and others should be handled like early Hitlers.
Ask what would you do if ...
I don’t even know who that is.
In my opinion, it isn’t going to end well for Nazi Box of Rocks and Schmucky and the rest of their Marxist Liberal cohorts.
lesseee here Donny...your side doesn’t know whether they’re a “he”, “she” or an “it”; consequently can’t figure out which bathroom even to use, much less which end of a firearm is the business end.
Wanna tell us all just exactly how that is supposed to work out?
I wouldn’t say that - there are plenty of leftwing moonbat terrorists armed to the teeth.
I wish conservatives would stop believing “we have all the guns”.
it’s pretty much dead nuts out to 300, haven’t had a chance to try it past there yet
And donny and leftist friends are wholly to blame.
JoMa
Bring it on. Farmers & hunters have the food & ammo, snowflakes are done. Great learning experience
Scuzzfeed Lies, Deutsch incites violence, water's wet, sky's blue...
Donny Deutsch: 'We Are Heading to a Civil War'
“I dont even know who that is.”
me neither ...
“We are IN a Civil War, Stup-Ass Douche.”
That’s a fact. It just hasn’t gone hot. Yet.
“This isnt going to end well.”
Nope. Civil wars are the ugliest of things.
Civil war does not necessarily equate to secession. In fact, most of the civil wars in history had nothing to do with secession.
Deutsch might be called the Anthony Bourdain of advertising and whorishness, only with fewer skills and lower standards.
I do that pretty regularly.
This is not how wars happen, nor is this a telling observation.
I bet you could say the same about the common people on both sides of any war. What were the differences between the common German and the common Frenchman in 1939? They had about the same fears and desires and obligations. The German was no monster who thirsted for French blood, and if asked would have said he was against a war. And so on, in just about every case.
Wars happen when an activist minority starts one. Then the opposing activist minority reacts.
Poor people dont start civil wars. They can be tools for others, but they dont start them.
And all civil wars are started by an activist minority.
Its the same scenario over and over - start violence, provoke a reaction, wave the bloody shirt, radicalize more people, do something else, provoke worse reactions, until you get a real war, a real revolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.