Posted on 11/25/2017 12:41:43 PM PST by Fhios
If you don't have 100% surety that what you're shooting is wild game, WTF are shooting for?
We tell non hunters to wear orange when walking in woods or field. Not a bad idea in hunting country during hunting season. It prevents a guy who legitimately sees a deer realize there is a human in the foreground or background. Know your backstop.
But this guy saw her and aimed at her. He is either a total ass or he wanted to kill her.
Isn't it a little ... odd ... that he's hunting deer with a single-shot hand gun?
And that he would try to shoot one after dark? And at 200 yards? (I'm visualizing person standing in the evening twilight at the far end of 2 football fields).
When he couldn't see well enough to know if it had two legs or four?
Isn't it 3x too strange?
That's a little more info that we had yesterday.
That's not odd at all. I'll explain in detail if you want ... suffice to say that "single shot handguns" are built for hunting. It's their design purpose.
And that he would try to shoot one after dark?
It's illegal, immoral, reckless, dangerous, stupid, add your own similar adjectives.
And at 200 yards?
That's not out of bounds, but it is a longer range for deer hunting in the east.
When he couldn't see well enough to know if it had two legs or four?
That gets back to the 'after dark', twilight, bad seeing thing. IF YOU CAN'T POSITIVELY IDENTIFY IT as your particular species of animal that you're hunting, DON'T SHOOT IT.
Dude should go up for either voluntary manslaughter or murder in the second degree ... unless something comes up to make it first degree.
Criminally negligent homicide, this careless moron broke enough laws, regulations and safety rules to earn a decade in prison and a lifetime of working off his debt to victim and society.
No. Its a thing folks do. They have written reams on the subject. These are usually scoped guns. Its not an unsafe trick if you have practiced your skills. But a human at 200 yards in an open field looks like a human.
Shooting that far with a handgun requires a scope and he should be able to recognize his target with glass. Or dont shoot.
What the Hell did he shoot her at 200 yards with, a desert eagle??
Earlier reports said 200 yards (600 feet) at/around 5pm which is pretty much dark? Really?? Who hunts normally that time of night with a handgun? Might be he was having an affair and she was going to tell.
...and shot Billquist from 200 yards away, ..”
200 yards away?
I’m thinking most people would think this through somewhat?
Sunset was probably something like 4:57 PM. There is plenty of light after that to identify a target and beyond, and take a safe shot. That’s why many states permit hunting for 1/2 after sundown.
With that being stated, the hunter always is responsible for identifying his target and beyond. The hunter always is responsible for any projectile that he releases.
It sounds like a planned hit to me.
Either he is lying about why he shot her or he is a criminally negligent dumbass that violated the most basic rules of hunting. Either way he should be prosecuted.
Of course someone in the left wing media is going to blame the NRA, but that is like blaming defensive driving instructors for drunk drivers.
...and a very good time to hunt whitetail deer is at dawn and sundown (+/- some minutes) because that’s when they’re guaranteed pretty much to show themselves.
Single shot. Probably a scoped Thompson Center Contender in a rifle caliber. Its about the same as a scoped rifle if you know what youre doing.
Dude knew her, and plotted to kill her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.