Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/06/2017 7:18:47 AM PDT by samovar123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: samovar123

“The overheating is also a reason why suppressors (silences in Hillarys vernacular) are never used on such weapons. “

Well that is just not so. The marines use suppressors on their 5.56 combat rifles. I have fired suppressed Mac-10’s, HK subguns, and an HK .308 full auto without melting anything.


2 posted on 10/06/2017 7:22:03 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: samovar123

It will be handled as all of these are.

“The American people are too childish, fearful, stupid and vengeful to be able to handle this.”

Which is cover for,

“If they knew the truth, nobody would ever vote Democrat.”


3 posted on 10/06/2017 8:12:41 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: samovar123

Lots of good questions. But I believe there other windows were broken out.

The “multiple” shots theory was explained to me by a freeper. One, one bang from the powder exploding. Two, the bullet breaking the sound barrier. Three, echoes.

As for security guards chasing a security guard, give me a break. The security guards were all running and one was faster than the others.


4 posted on 10/06/2017 8:13:34 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: samovar123
Mostly hogwash. Also extremely poorly written and needs an editor, a spellchecker, a grammarian, and a common sense filter. Was this written by a non-native speaker of English? Is this a test to see which theories the sheeple will swallow? My current opinion is that there is far more to this than we are being told. However..... 1. A crime scene so massive and with so many different crime scenes will be completely covered and B.S. The government never comes clean. Sometimes for a good reason (looking for accomplices) must mostly because they are habitual liars and treat the citizenry as if they were stupid children unable to handle the facts. 2. Paddock, an out of shape former accountant with no military training is not capable of pulling this off by himself. I've been out shooting with 10 and 12 year olds who could have pulled this off. 3. With no experience in guns .... What makes you so sure he had no experience? Most people with a gun collection do not just collect them, but also fire them. A few practice sessions on a range (or more likely some secluded spot in the dessert) wold be plenty of experience. 4. ho could he have fired as rapidly and accurately as he did I'll leave to others to address "rapidly" but as far as accuracy goes, he had a gigantic target. Unless you think he was accurately picking off particular individuals, all he had to do was aim in the general direction of the mass of people. "shooting fish in a barrel" 5. As a military veteran and have experience with fully automatic weapons, they can be hard to control, jam easily and tend to overheat. This is, IMO, overstated. Yes, weapons can jam and overheat, and if he had a single weapon that would be a flaw in his plan. But he had multiple weapons. If one overheated he could drop it an move to the next. It's a reasonable assumption that that was part of the plan. 6. There are those that are already declaring this a “false flag” Would not surprise me. Nor would it surprise me to find out it was ISIS or some other terrorist operation. 7. Attention must be paid to those who are doing the investigation. Most worthwhile sentence in the whole article. Agree 100%.
5 posted on 10/06/2017 8:40:37 AM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: samovar123
Wow. The stupid is strong with this one.

Paddock, an out of shape former accountant with no military training is not capable of pulling this off by himself.

Not true. He was in good enough shape to handle a light AR-15

Using an automatic weapon effectively takes extensive training and experience in the use of such weapons.

No. Not really. He was firing into a tightly-packed crowd of 20,000 people and even then, bullets were flying everywhere (fuel depot).

There are pictures that clearly show rifle fire from a lower window.

No, there are not.

I can not understand how anyone, much less Paddock can carry so many weapons and ammunition into a room without being seen.

The stupid continues. 27 firearms could easily fit in about three or four duffel bags. You can roll them from the parking lot to your room on a luggage caddy.

why so many rifles and weapons if there was only one shooter.

Because they can overheat and bump stocks can jam.

Automatic weapons have a very pronounced flash, why were there no flashes from the 32nd floor?

Even at night an AR-15 is not going to have much of a flash, particularly from 1100 feet away. I thought you said you fired these things before?

There are purported to be flashes from the 4th floor, but that has not been confirmed.

Magic bullets that fly through windows without breaking glass. Cool!

although there are reports that Antifa literature may have been found in his room.

What reports?

The final question I have is – has the Australian man, Brian Hodge, who was in the room next to Paddock

Except he wasn't in the room when Paddock was shooting.

6 posted on 10/06/2017 8:59:29 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson