Posted on 08/20/2017 11:15:10 PM PDT by kathsua
With such race hate fundamental in Nation of Islam, how is it the “marches” aren’t called race hate rallies?
The author states: “The first documented marriage of an African to a North American occurred in Florida in 1525.”
I’d like to see a footnote and source on that.
Does the author mean a Florida Indian married an African slave?
Since native Floridians had no written language, how was it documented?
The Spanish did not create any settlements in Florida until about 1560, and most of them failed, except for St. Augustine, which began around 1565.
I want cultural marxists of all colors, who constantly use the term ‘racism’ to divide and conquer, sterilized and deported.
How bout that.
“I don’t understand why people want to brag about being the same color as the people who created the world wars. “
Dumb logic. Indians fought each other. Blacks have slaughtered millions in Africa. There isn’t an indian nation nor a black nation worth a sh*t to live in.
“I had an ancestor who was on the winning side at Little Big Horn. I don’t understand why people want to brag about being the same color as the people who created the world wars.”
Probably because they also created pretty much everything else, from science, technology, art, literature philosophy, and yes very deadly weapons.
And if the winners at Little Big Horn had the same technological power and were in the same situation, what makes you think they would have not started world wars? After all they were not the peaceful, noble savages of Hollywood.
American tribes went after each other with the same murderous fervor as european countries went after each other, the mongols spreading terror where they went, the african tribes exterminating each other, etc.
The only difference between europeans and the others is that europeans developed better weapons, and all the others are now eager to get those same weapons.
The Indians were conquered. Like people have been conquered for well, as long as history has been recorded. Phoenicians, Egyptians, Vikings, Alex the Great, the various polynesian and Asian islands; Africa’s still at it. And while the Yanks were squishy about it (remember, after the Civil War Rebs’ ability to own land west or participate in land rushes was severely restricted), the Indians at least ended up with vast territories, something unusual in a world that was used to conquering with complete destruction. The Mexican/German Zimmerman Telegram along with U-boats sinking merchant ships drew us into WW1. The Japanese drew America into 2nd WW. Should we not have responded to the destruction of our citizens and ships? If nations declare war on our soil, do we say, thank you, come in and have a seat ?
Good, were all mixed race. No racists possible here.
But, here’s a Certainty The Left Hates: Only 2 genders for all our ancestors.
No, I’m just moving to Maine.
The Indians were also a very small population; the primitive way of life prevented them from supporting large populations in most of what is now the United States. While Latin America had some large cities built by and populated with Indians, we have nothing like that (except maybe the cliff dwellings of the southwest?).
As for the world wars, we were already involved before any formal declaration; we were violating neutrality by arming England in WWI (while abiding by their blockade of Germany), and when American pilots in China were flying American planes against the Japanese in the 1930s it is hard to say we were “neutral” (never mind the oil embargo).
Huh?
Hello, nopardons! I’m a Far West buff and know a lot about Custer et al. Yes, indeedy, the western tribes were notoriously violent with each other and with pioneers. Custer was always tracking down pioneer women who were captured by Sioux and Cheyanne. Not a pretty pix.
And, indeed, they won the battle. They lost the war.
But that's NOT happening. We see the United States as our home... AND we wish African-Americans felt the same way.
Here’ something to ponder - Obama’s family owned slaves - no statues for Obama:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3579270/posts?page=1
from link:
According to the research, one of Obama’s great-great-great-great grandfathers, George Washington Overall, owned two slaves who were recorded in the 1850 census in Nelson County, Ky. The same records show that one of Obama’s great-great-great-great-great-grandmothers, Mary Duvall, also owned two slaves.
The Baltimore Sun retraced much of Reitwiesner’s work, using census information available on the Web site ancestry.com and documents retrieved by the Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives, among other sources. The records show that Overall, then 30, owned a 15-year-old black female and a 25-year-old black male, while Mary Duvall, his mother-in-law, owned a 60-year-old black man and a 58-year-old black woman.
-
“Whiteness” is a proxy for modern, as opposed to tribal or not modern(e.g, unawareness of time, oversensitivity to shame or humiliation and inability to take a joke, dogmatic beliefs rather than relative or contextual beliefs, lying to maintain group solidarity and honor, irrational in the sense of emphasizing tradition and emotions rather than rational economic values. Culture, not racial characteristics, matter.
Correlations matter in some contexts. For example, we don't travel into SE DC neighborhoods for any reason. But since we are dealing with a bell curve of individuals, we can cherry pick the individuals from the top end of the bell curve from any race, ignore the masses in the middle, and lock up the low end of any race as soon as they do something stupid.
“Another part is they had “dominion over the Earth and Mars” until Yacub’s blue-eyed Devils stole everything thru “tricknology”.
Not kidding.”
Don’t forget that they don’t have to go to school because they absorb ‘wisdom’ from the sun.
But who would support their lazy asses?
I can live with pretty much anyone so long as I’m not expected to pay their bills.
Everyone on earth originally came from Africa.>>>>>>>>>>>>
That’s not true, they also came from elsewhere, the science is new on that, but its not true that humans originated in Africa exclusively as formerly believed.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/
AND
http://www.nature.com/news/how-china-is-rewriting-the-book-on-human-origins-1.20231
There are far more “origin “ locations than just Africa.
Sorry, not sure what the point of the article is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.