Posted on 06/08/2017 7:29:42 AM PDT by Morgana
Canadian Government Tells Parents To Let Your Children Be Transgender Are Lose Your Child
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Maybe fix the title? Looks like an interesting article.
That is how it was posted....I can’t fix it...the author posted it misspelled.
No problem.
next time I’ll add the “(sic)” to the title. E.T. does this from time to time. He rants well enough in his stories but does not prof read before he posts.
I’m sure Ontatio will be removing children from parents who are pressuring their children to be transgender as well.
You don’t really have “parental rights.” You have the obligation to change diapers and to pay for everything, but you do not have the right to decide if your child will receive instruction in school on how to be gay, if he/she will do gay things, if he/she will have sex organs mangled and declare him/herself a member of the opposite sex, and if your daughter will have an abortion.
Offer them instant citizenship. Those that don’t take us up on that do so at their own risk. At least they’re not Moozlems.
All your base are belong to us.
In the specific case in Ontario, it’s the school who is pressurizing the child to be “transgender”. The parents objected, so the son was taken away.
The same garbage is going on in Minnesota, where a child is not only being pressured to be “transgender”, but the state is already requiring that he be given hormone injections by doctors. Further reason why I don’t recognize any professional license from that state.
Meanwhile, on a related subject:
I believe it was the early Romans who prohibited several classes of people from holding public office: Those of illegitimate birth (bastards), eunuchs and homosexuals.
While these children had no choice in the matter, bastards were prohibited because, having no sense of their family past or history, they could not be trusted to operate for the good of the culture based on its history or traditions.
Eunuchs (castrated males) and homosexuals because they could not and/or would not sire children and would, therefore, most likely have no abiding interest in preserving the culture for future generations.
While there are a number of exceptions, I’ll let YOU tell me what sort of folks we have in public office in mush of the West.
I suspect these nations have employed technology to compress into a few years what it took the Romans over 2,000 to achieve: TOTAL AND UTTER CULTURAL COLLAPSE!!!
IS AMERICA NEXT?????
Do Europe’s “leaders” have a stake in the future?
One noteworthy reality about Europe’s current political leadership is summarised here by Phil Lawler:
* Macron, the newly elected French president, has no children.
* German chancellor Angela Merkel has no children.
* British prime minister Theresa May has no children.
* Italian prime minister Paolo Gentiloni has no children.
* Holland’s Mark Rutte, Sweden’s Stefan Löfven, Luxembourg Xavier Bettel, Scotland’s Nicola Sturgeon—ALL HAVE NO CHILDREN!
*Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the European Commission, has no children.
So a grossly disproportionate number of the people making decisions about Europe’s future have no direct personal stake in that future.
Author is an idiot so won’t read past the headline.
Indeed. She’s a very good and unfairly maligned woman.
From 2011:
http://ndepth.newsok.com/anita-bryant
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.