Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Requiring photo ID is “racist,” except when it’s done by Obama, the NAACP, unions, or other liberals
wordpress ^ | June 6, 2015 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

Posted on 05/14/2017 5:41:24 AM PDT by grundle

Requiring photo ID is “racist,” except when it’s done by Obama, the NAACP, unions, or any other liberals

Former Rhode Island governor Lincoln Chafee recently announced that he wants to be the Democrats’ 2016 presidential candidate.

In July 2011, Governor Chafee signed a bill that requires voters to show photo ID.

In March 2012, Obama’s Justice Department blocked Texas’s voter ID requirement, claiming that it was “racist.”

However, the very same Justice Department requires photo ID for everyone who enters.

So let’s say that someone is denied their right to vote because they don’t have voter ID, and they want to file a lawsuit at the Justice Department. But because they don’t have photo ID, they can’t get into the Justice Department in the first place!

In this video, beginning at 2:39, we see that Obama’s Justice Department requires photo ID for everyone who enters:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZf25pmgR4c

The same video also shows that you need photo ID in order to enter other liberal organizations which claim that requiring voter ID is “racist,” including the Advancement Project (at 1:38), the Center for American Progress (2:08), and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (2:23).

At a July 2012 NAACP event, NAACP President Ben Jealous claimed that requiring voter ID was “racist.” However, at that very same event, the NAACP required photo ID in order to get into the event in the first place!

Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain, India, and South Africa all require photo ID in order to vote, but U.S. liberals don’t consider those countries’ requirements to be “racist.”

In January 2012, Illinois passed a law which requires buyers of drain cleaner to show photo ID, but liberals didn’t accuse this requirement of being “racist.”

In June 2012, Michelle Obama required photo ID in order to attend her book signings, but liberals didn’t accuse her of being “racist.”

In June 2012, Barack Obama required photo ID in order to attend his campaign events, but liberals didn’t accuse him of being “racist.”

This article from Politico includes the following photograph of a labor union that requires photo ID in order for its members to vote, but liberals didn’t accuse this union of being “racist”:

In my opinion, requiring photo ID is never “racist.”

However, I would like liberals to please explain why it is “racist” when conservatives do it, but not “racist” when liberals do it.

Anyway, according to liberals’ own “logic,” Lincoln Chafee is a “racist.” Why would they want him to be president?


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: blogpimpsowhat; photoid; voterid

1 posted on 05/14/2017 5:41:24 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

You require ID to get a driver’s license, food stamps, welfare, a job, basically anything except to vote it seems. Their claim is that the poor would be disenfranchised but the poor need ID in order to get assistance. So how is it that they have ID for benefits but no ID when it comes to voting time?


2 posted on 05/14/2017 5:49:18 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

No voter ID is the biggest crock of bs that continues to be foisted on the republic by the corrupt democrats. Let those without voter ID ‘vote’ but their vote goes into a special voting machine that has a shredder that spits the pieces out the back for confetti to be used in the gay day parade.


3 posted on 05/14/2017 5:55:27 AM PDT by TnTnTn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I live in NYS. ID is required for a number of things: getting a hunting/fishing license for the first time, to get some medical care, to attend an R-rated movie if you’re below a cetrain age, to buy booze and tobacco products at the grocery store. Board a plane. To name just a few.

But no ID needed to vote.

Go figure.


4 posted on 05/14/2017 5:56:09 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
In other news, water is still wet.

And your screen name is still an obscene joke.

5 posted on 05/14/2017 6:42:52 AM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

You have to show and ID to do ANYTHING!

Except vote. LMAO.........the fact that this voter fraud tactic is allowed is about as in your face as you can get.

This has to be stopped. I want a law. Think our wonderful Speaker will get it going in the House???

Trumpster to the rescue. This man get’s things done!!!


6 posted on 05/14/2017 6:43:32 AM PDT by LouisianaJoanof Arc (Proud Horrible Deplorable that wants HRC prosecuted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

BINGO.... Good observation!


7 posted on 05/14/2017 7:33:10 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This only works because the media presents it as truth and the public is dumb.


8 posted on 05/14/2017 7:33:56 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Freedom of speech: an illusion that Americans hold fast to, although it disappeared decades ago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
But no ID needed to vote.

Go figure.

No figuring needed. The ONLY WAY the Demoncrat Party can win elections is with massive voter fraud.

The RATS think Americans are stupid enough to let them continue cheating. Well, are we?

9 posted on 05/14/2017 7:36:00 AM PDT by politicianslie (What would a terrorist do if he were made POTUS? : Exactly what Hussein Obama did)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: politicianslie

Up till now, the facts speak for themselves.


10 posted on 05/14/2017 7:38:21 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Let’s not forget the democRAT party insisted on photo id to get into their ‘16 convention.


11 posted on 05/14/2017 7:43:32 AM PDT by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Wasn’t there a poll showing that 21% of people that opposed photo ID for voting didn’t know that a driver’s license would qualify?


12 posted on 05/14/2017 10:09:27 AM PDT by gundog (Hail to the Chief, bitches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

I thought it was the “gooch.” Gonna need an urban thesaurus, soon.


13 posted on 05/14/2017 10:11:59 AM PDT by gundog (Hail to the Chief, bitches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson