RKBA Ping List
This list is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.
Please FReepmail me to be added to or deleted from this ping list.
Posted on 02/07/2017 12:36:12 PM PST by PROCON
A ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit finds that carrying a gun—even lawfully—is justification for police to treat you as suspect until evidence proves otherwise. This turns the normal approach to policing on its head, limiting Fourth Amendment protections normally in place for those considered innocent until proven guilty.
In fact, Ammoland reported that Judge James A. Wynn opined, “Individuals who carry firearms—lawfully or unlawfully—pose a categorical risk of danger to others and police officers, in particular.” Wynn added, “Individuals who choose to carry firearms [therefore] forego certain constitutional protections afforded to individuals who elect not to carry firearms.”
The 4th Circuit ruling was issued in United States v. Robinson, a case brought by Shaquille Montel Robinson after he believed himself unconstitutionally targeted for search and seizure—and ultimately arrested—because he was carrying a gun.
Robinson’s saga began on March 24, 2014, when an unidentified caller notified the Ranson, W.V., Police Department that they had seen “an African-American male” load a handgun, conceal it in his pocket and climb into the passenger side of a Toyota Camry “driven by a white female.”
Officer Kendall Hudson spotted the car minutes after the call was placed, and pulled the vehicle over after noting that Robinson and the driver were not wearing seat belts.
According to court documents:
(Excerpt) Read more at americas1stfreedom.org ...
A Hillary Clinton appointed court would have further impacted the 2nd Amendment. What a bullet we dodged in November!
We need the Senate to get Judge Gorsuch confirmed soon and hope for a few more SCOTUS retirements.
RKBA Ping List
This list is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.
Please FReepmail me to be added to or deleted from this ping list.
That’s like saying talking makes you a suspect in a riot until proven otherwise!
does having a vagina make someone a prostitute ?
An unconstitutional ruling that should be nullified by the states and considered void.
So Judge, just how many Concealed Carry Pistol License holders a year commit violent gun crimes compared to criminals? In my state we call them “good guy cards” as they certify to all that you and your criminal/mental record have been evaluated and you are NOT A THREAT!
does having a vagina make someone a prostitute ?
= = =
In this era of trannys, you will hope so.
No, but according to the “women’s movement”, if you have a dick you’re a suspect.
Judge James A. Wynn opined, “Individuals who carry firearms—lawfully or unlawfully—pose a categorical risk of danger to others and police officers, in particular.” Wynn added, “Individuals who choose to carry firearms [therefore] forego certain constitutional protections afforded to individuals who elect not to carry firearms.”
How about king-fu experts? How about a chainsaw? A mad ferret?
They’ll let anyone wear a black robe these days.
This is crazy.
If anything it would be the observed weirdness of the people stopped. Then you see they have a gun on top of that and it puts anyones radar up.
But this zerothink everyone isma suspect if they have a gun,,is nuts. Context. Context and observed behavior.
Sounds like LEOs are now Terrorists.
Suspected of what?...................
So, according to the activist maggots on the 4th Circus, you’re GUILTY until proven innocent. Not your father’s or Founding Father justice system.
Wynn added, “Individuals who choose to carry firearms [therefore] forego certain constitutional protections
= = =
BAckwards.
Those carrying firearms enjoy and enforce their constitutional protections.
Armed felons- bad. This has nothing to do with legal carry.
Yes. That's true. Even if they're wearing a funny blue suit with a badge on the shirt. Those guys are posing a categorical risk of danger to everyone around them ... even in the donut shop. So I'm justified in treating them like anyone else who is armed and posing to me a categorical danger of death or grave bodily harm.
Right?
How 'bout that, "Judge"?
Yep. That's exactly the correct interpretation of this "ruling".
The modern feminist movement says yes, unless proven to be a lesbian.
Many judges have a gun under their robes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.