Posted on 01/14/2017 7:14:22 AM PST by SMGFan
Edited on 01/14/2017 11:57:49 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
WHAT? I thought Ryan WAS a rino
Actually, I saw that and I still liked Emma and Patrick better when I saw them first run.
The Chinese should spend their money building up their own film industry - - and STOP trying to buy Hollywood. The Chinese should let Hollywood fail on it’s own.
Hollywood’s one industry none of us will cry over - - or defend.
And J.J. Abrams did very well with Star Wars: The Force Awakens.
That does not mean they possess wisdom which I or anyone else must pay heed to, however.
The more Joss opens his mouth, the more thankful I am we have the small batch of Firefly episodes available we do. I’m sure he would have eventually converged the show into an SJW crapfest.
I’m not usually a fan of romances unless there is something different about them or they are really truly hilarious. I have not seen a single Ryan Gosling movie (retch). But this one caught my attention immediately...maybe because I have had similar experiences of remote viewing.
I’ve pretty much sh!t canned this whole “Star Wars” genre of retreaded and reimagined efforts to revive the franchise on four decades of filmography.
I just don’t care for social engineering, rehashed and reimagined transitive connections and all the hype.
Computers have come a long way, but they are no substitute for a wonderful, simple story.
I was there for the first experience in a theater, first showing of the original and there is still nothing that beats that.
In deference to your obvious liking of this movie, I shall view it (or view it again, given my advanced memory regression.) :0)
Hmmm...remote viewing. Then I’d suspect that you’d like a movie called “Suspect Zero.” I watch that movie every year.
I have no doubt you are completely prescient in your guess.
Hm, this is strange. I don’t normally agree with Hollywood politically. There are some lonely rhinos at the LA Zoo.
Joss thinks that Paul Ryan isn’t on his side. What an idiot.
Ryan has repeatedly bent over backwards appeasing democrats, so it would be logical Weydon would find him suitable for liberal perverted sex acts as the ones Hollywood projects upon us in just about every film they make these days. To bad Ryan is blind to the lack of respect democrats have for him, although they certainly appreciate his efforts to backstab Donald Trump.
Totally off topic, but.....
I’ve been thinking if there is a “conservative” or at least non-leftist Everyman actor to counter Tom Hanks. Everyone loves him. But he’s disappointingly left.
I propose: Denzel Washington. He’s either not leftist or smart enough to keep his mouth shut. I dig him in everything he’s in. He’s popular enough to be able to be offered the best, top shelf roles Hollywood has to offer.
Yeah, I’ve been shut in for a couple days owing to ice in Oklahoma where the weather commonly murders people.
Freepers discuss, please.
Oh yeah, I like that Aaron Eckhart guy. I just saw him in Sully.
Too much cocaine in Hollywood.
It’s a good movie.
And my experiences with remote viewing are not nearly quite as exciting. It’s more like “What road is this I am on?” (I see a lot of car dashboards and steering wheels) Or “What store am I in?” And I can never, ever, read the signs, like road signs or anything. I can see the letters but simply cannot put them together.
Wow.... must be exciting to say the least. I think you’ll enjoy this movie then. Aaron Eckhart, Ben Kingsley and Carrie-Anne Moss.
Revealing once again that Follywood is where mental defectives can find employment. But why is it that sane people support their hideous products with their money? That should never happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.